IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v122y2018i4p389-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder views on the role of spiritual care in Australian hospitals: An exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Holmes, Cheryl

Abstract

Research increasingly demonstrates the contribution of spiritual care to patient experience, wellbeing and health outcomes. Responsiveness to spiritual needs is recognised as a legitimate component of quality health care. Yet there is no consistent approach to the models and governance of spiritual care across hospitals in Australia. This is consistent with the situation in other developed countries where there is increased attention to identifying best practice models for spiritual care in health. This study explores the views of stakeholders in Australian hospitals to the role of spiritual care in hospitals. A self-completion questionnaire comprising open and closed questions was distributed using a snowball sampling process. Analysis of 477 complete questionnaires indicated high levels of agreement with ten policy statements and six policy objectives. Perceived barriers to spiritual care related to: terminology and roles, education and training, resources, and models of care. Responses identified the issues to inform a national policy agenda including attention to governance and policy structures and clear delineation of roles and scope of practice with aligned education and training models. The inclusion of spiritual care as a significant pathway for the provision of patient-centred care is noted. Further exploration of the contribution of spiritual care to wellbeing, health outcomes and patient experience is invited.

Suggested Citation

  • Holmes, Cheryl, 2018. "Stakeholder views on the role of spiritual care in Australian hospitals: An exploratory study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(4), pages 389-395.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:122:y:2018:i:4:p:389-395
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.02.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851018300460
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.02.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bentur, Netta & Resnitzky, Shirli & Sterne, Abram, 2010. "Attitudes of stakeholders and policymakers in the healthcare system towards the provision of spiritual care in Israel," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 13-19, June.
    2. Robyn Keall & Josephine M Clayton & Phyllis Butow, 2014. "How do Australian palliative care nurses address existential and spiritual concerns? Facilitators, barriers and strategies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3197-3205, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suh‐Ing Hsieh & Li‐Ling Hsu & Chen‐Yi Kao & Sara Breckenridge‐Sproat & Hui‐Ling Lin & Hsiu‐Chen Tai & Tzu‐Hsin Huang & Tsung‐Lan Chu, 2020. "Factors associated with spiritual care competencies in Taiwan’s clinical nurses: A descriptive correlational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1599-1613, May.
    2. Pamela H Cone & Tove Giske, 2017. "Nurses’ comfort level with spiritual assessment: a study among nurses working in diverse healthcare settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3125-3136, October.
    3. David Greenfield & Reece Hinchcliff & Anne Hogden & Virginia Mumford & Deborah Debono & Marjorie Pawsey & Johanna Westbrook & Jeffrey Braithwaite, 2016. "A hybrid health service accreditation program model incorporating mandated standards and continuous improvement: interview study of multiple stakeholders in Australian health care," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 116-130, July.
    4. Elizabeth Batstone & Cara Bailey & Nutmeg Hallett, 2020. "Spiritual care provision to end‐of‐life patients: A systematic literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3609-3624, October.
    5. Greenfield, David & Hinchcliff, Reece & Pawsey, Marjorie & Westbrook, Johanna & Braithwaite, Jeffrey, 2013. "The public disclosure of accreditation information in Australia: Stakeholder perceptions of opportunities and challenges," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 151-159.
    6. Tove Giske & Pamela H Cone, 2015. "Discerning the healing path – how nurses assist patient spirituality in diverse health care settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2926-2935, October.
    7. Mary E. Minton & Mary J. Isaacson & Brandon Michael Varilek & Jessica L. Stadick & Shannon O'Connell‐Persaud, 2018. "A willingness to go there: Nurses and spiritual care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 173-181, January.
    8. Rocío de Diego Cordero & Bárbara Badanta Romero & Filomena Adelaide de Matos & Emília Costa & Daniele Corcioli Mendes Espinha & Claudia de Souza Tomasso & Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti & Giancarl, 2018. "Opinions and attitudes on the relationship between spirituality, religiosity and health: A comparison between nursing students from Brazil and Portugal," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2804-2813, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:122:y:2018:i:4:p:389-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.