IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i19-20p2967-2978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients’ experiences of healthcare encounters in severe irritable bowel syndrome: an analysis based on narrative and feminist theory

Author

Listed:
  • Ida Björkman
  • Magnus Simrén
  • Gisela Ringström
  • Eva Jakobsson Ung

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study aimed to explore patients’ experiences of healthcare encounters in severe irritable bowel syndrome. Background Irritable bowel syndrome is a common functional disorder with symptoms such as abdominal pain and disturbed bowel habits, the cause of which is not completely known. Treatments options are limited, and healthcare encounters in irritable bowel syndrome have been described as unsatisfying and frustrating for both patients and professional healthcare providers. Furthermore, the influence of power on healthcare encounters has long been recognised, especially regarding the disadvantaged position of those suffering from functional illness which cannot be identified by commonly used tests or investigations. Methods We interviewed 10 patients during 2014, all attending an outpatient clinic and suffering from severe irritable bowel syndrome. Relying on narrative and feminist theory, we explored how they actively negotiate professional discourse communicated to them in the clinical encounter. Results The patients’ experiences of healthcare encounters in irritable bowel syndrome were mostly described as negative, and often induced feelings of confusion and self‐doubt. Positive encounters were described as being listened to, believed and taken seriously. Narrators found it especially problematic when healthcare professionals described irritable bowel syndrome as a minor disorder with primarily stress or psychological aetiology and put the responsibility for recovery onto the patient. Patients’ actively negotiated such professional discourse by presenting a counternarrative describing their own suffering and strengths, experienced healthcare shortcomings and possible organic aetiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Conclusions Patients suffering from severe irritable bowel syndrome described how they often felt a need to protect their positive identities in the face of trivialisation and disbelief by healthcare professionals. Relevance to clinical practice A deepened understanding of patients’ experiences of healthcare encounters in irritable bowel syndrome could enable more helpful and supporting interventions by healthcare professionals.

Suggested Citation

  • Ida Björkman & Magnus Simrén & Gisela Ringström & Eva Jakobsson Ung, 2016. "Patients’ experiences of healthcare encounters in severe irritable bowel syndrome: an analysis based on narrative and feminist theory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2967-2978, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2967-2978
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13400
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Werner, Anne & Malterud, Kirsti, 2003. "It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(8), pages 1409-1419, October.
    2. Kugelmann, Robert, 1999. "Complaining about chronic pain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(12), pages 1663-1676, December.
    3. Kay I Penny & Graeme D Smith, 2012. "The use of data‐mining to identify indicators of health‐related quality of life in patients with irritable bowel syndrome," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(19pt20), pages 2761-2771, October.
    4. Eccleston, Chris & De C. Williams, Amanda C. & Rogers, Wendy Stainton, 1997. "Patients' and professionals' understandings of the causes of chronic pain: Blame, responsibility and identity protection," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 699-709, September.
    5. Werner, Anne & Isaksen, L.W.Lise Widding & Malterud, Kirsti, 2004. "'I am not the kind of woman who complains of everything': Illness stories on self and shame in women with chronic pain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(5), pages 1035-1045, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elisabet Johannesson & Eva Jakobsson Ung & Gisela Ringström & Riadh Sadik, 2019. "The experiences of physical activity in irritable bowel syndrome—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3189-3199, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pryma, Jane, 2017. "“Even my sister says I'm acting like a crazy to get a check”: Race, gender, and moral boundary-work in women's claims of disabling chronic pain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 66-73.
    2. Rasmussen, Erik Børve, 2020. "Rhetorical work and medical authority: Constructing convincing cases in insurance medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    3. Sim, Julius & Madden, Sue, 2008. "Illness experience in fibromyalgia syndrome: A metasynthesis of qualitative studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 57-67, July.
    4. Wamsiedel, Marius, 2020. "Credibility work and moral evaluation at the ED," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. Bryant, Louise D. & Green, Josephine M. & Hewison, Jenny, 2006. "Understandings of Down's syndrome: A Q methodological investigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(5), pages 1188-1200, September.
    6. Emily D. Heaphy, 2013. "Repairing Breaches with Rules: Maintaining Institutions in the Face of Everyday Disruptions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1291-1315, October.
    7. Santer, Miriam & Wyke, Sally & Warner, Pam, 2008. "Women's management of menstrual symptoms: Findings from a postal survey and qualitative interviews," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 276-288, January.
    8. Hicks, Alison, 2022. "The missing link: Towards an integrated health and information literacy research agenda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    9. Rosa Esteve & Alicia Eva López-Martínez & Gema Teresa Ruíz-Párraga & Elena Rocío Serrano-Ibáñez & Carmen Ramírez-Maestre, 2020. "Pain Acceptance and Pain-Related Disability Predict Healthcare Utilization and Medication Intake in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Spinal Pain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.
    10. Baker, Rachel Mairi, 2006. "Economic rationality and health and lifestyle choices for people with diabetes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(9), pages 2341-2353, November.
    11. Dumit, Joseph, 2006. "Illnesses you have to fight to get: Facts as forces in uncertain, emergent illnesses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 577-590, February.
    12. van Exel, Job & Baker, Rachel & Mason, Helen & Donaldson, Cam & Brouwer, Werner, 2015. "Public views on principles for health care priority setting: Findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 128-137.
    13. Koekkoek, B. & Hutschemaekers, G. & van Meijel, B. & Schene, A., 2011. "How do patients come to be seen as 'difficult'?: A mixed-methods study in community mental health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 504-512, February.
    14. Weckesser, Annalise & Denny, Elaine, 2017. "Re-working biographies: Women's narratives of pregnancy whilst living with epilepsy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 110-117.
    15. Philip Kinghorn & Angela Robinson & Richard Smith, 2015. "Developing a Capability-Based Questionnaire for Assessing Well-Being in Patients with Chronic Pain," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 897-916, February.
    16. Jaworska, Sylvia & Ryan, Kath, 2018. "Gender and the language of pain in chronic and terminal illness: A corpus-based discourse analysis of patients' narratives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 107-114.
    17. Dassieu, Lise & Kaboré, Jean-Luc & Choinière, Manon & Arruda, Nelson & Roy, Élise, 2020. "Painful lives: Chronic pain experience among people who use illicit drugs in Montreal (Canada)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    18. Kristin Margrethe Heggen & Henrik Berg, 2021. "Epistemic injustice in the age of evidence-based practice: The case of fibromyalgia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-6, December.
    19. Victoria Mailen Arfuch & Rosa Caballol Angelats & Carina Aguilar Martín & Alessandra Queiroga Gonçalves & Noèlia Carrasco-Querol & Gemma González Serra & Maria Cinta Sancho Sol & Immaculada Fusté Angu, 2022. "Patients’ Lived Experience in a Multicomponent Intervention for Fibromyalgia Syndrome in Primary Care: A Qualitative Interview Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Emslie, Carol & Ridge, Damien & Ziebland, Sue & Hunt, Kate, 2006. "Men's accounts of depression: Reconstructing or resisting hegemonic masculinity?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(9), pages 2246-2257, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2967-2978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.