IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i17-18p2528-2541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘We just do the dirty work’: dealing with incontinence, courtesy stigma and the low occupational status of carework in long‐term aged care facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Joan Ostaszkiewicz
  • Beverly O'Connell
  • Trisha Dunning

Abstract

Aims and objectives To systematically examine, describe and explain how continence care was determined, delivered and communicated in Australian long aged care facilities. Background Incontinence is a highly stigmatising condition that affects a disproportionally large number of people living in long‐term aged care facilities. Its day‐to‐day management is mainly undertaken by careworkers. We conducted a Grounded theory study to explore how continence care was determined, delivered and communicated in long‐term aged care facilities. This paper presents one finding, i.e. how careworkers in long‐term aged care facilities deal with the stigma, devaluation and the aesthetically unpleasant aspects of their work. Design Grounded theory. Methods Eighty‐eight hours of field observations in two long‐term aged care facilities in Australia. In addition, in‐depth interviews with 18 nurses and careworkers who had experience of providing, supervising or assessment of continence care in any long‐term aged care facility in Australia. Results Occupational exposure to incontinence contributes to the low occupational status of carework in long‐term aged care facilities, and continence care is a symbolic marker for inequalities within the facility, the nursing profession and society at large. Careworkers’ affective and behavioural responses are characterised by: (1) accommodating the context; (2) dissociating oneself; (3) distancing oneself and (4) attempting to elevate one's role status. Conclusion The theory extends current understandings about the links between incontinence, continence care, courtesy stigma, emotional labour and the low occupational status of carework in long‐term aged care facilities. Relevance to clinical practice This study provides insights into the ways in which tacit beliefs and values about incontinence, cleanliness and contamination may affect the social organisation and delivery of care in long‐term aged care facilities. Nurse leaders should challenge the stigma and devaluation of carework and careworkers, and reframe carework as ‘dignity work’.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan Ostaszkiewicz & Beverly O'Connell & Trisha Dunning, 2016. "‘We just do the dirty work’: dealing with incontinence, courtesy stigma and the low occupational status of carework in long‐term aged care facilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2528-2541, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:17-18:p:2528-2541
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13292
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charmaz, Kathy, 1990. "'Discovering' chronic illness: Using grounded theory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 1161-1172, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scales, Ashley N. & Quincy Brown, H., 2020. "The effects of organizational commitment and harmonious passion on voluntary turnover among social workers: A mixed methods study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Stuart Holland & Teresa Carla Oliveira, 2013. "Missing Links: Hume, Smith, Kant and Economic Methodology," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 2(2), pages 1-46, October.
    3. Irena Avirovic & Makedonka Radulovic, 2016. "Is De Facto Partnership a Threat to Marriage? a Case Study from Macedonia," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, January -.
    4. Mario Silic & Paul Benjamin Lowry, 2021. "Breaking Bad in Cyberspace: Understanding why and how Black Hat Hackers Manage their Nerves to Commit their Virtual Crimes," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 329-341, April.
    5. Broom, Alex & Adams, Jon & Tovey, Philip, 2009. "Evidence-based healthcare in practice: A study of clinician resistance, professional de-skilling, and inter-specialty differentiation in oncology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 192-200, January.
    6. São José, José & Barros, Rosanna & Samitca, Sanda & Teixeira, Ana, 2013. "Social Care and Well-being. Experiences and Perspectives of an Old-aged Group," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 1(3), pages 187-201.
    7. Kathy Charmaz & Virginia Olesen, 1997. "Ethnographic Research in Medical Sociology," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 25(4), pages 452-494, May.
    8. Benson, Outi & Gibson, Susanne & Boden, Zoë V.R. & Owen, Gareth, 2016. "Exhausted without trust and inherent worth: A model of the suicide process based on experiential accounts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 126-134.
    9. Alexandra Ainz-Galende & Rubén Rodríguez-Puertas, 2020. "The Demands of Niqabi Women in the Telegram Subaltern Corner Orgullo Niqabi," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 286-295.
    10. Lez Trujillo Torres & Benét DeBerry-Spence, 2019. "Consumer valorization strategies in traumatic extraordinary experiences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 516-531, May.
    11. Benet Reid, 2016. "Literary Ethnography of Evidence-Based Healthcare: Accessing the Emotions of Rational-Technical Discourse," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(4), pages 95-106, November.
    12. Cheng-Wen Lee & Shu Hui Chen, 2022. "Contradictions between Founders and Successors in Taiwan’s Family Business Inheritance: A Qualitative Study," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(5), pages 1-5.
    13. Gunjan Sharma & Kushagra Kulshreshtha & Naval Bajpai, 2022. "Getting over the issue of theoretical stagnation: an exploration and metamorphosis of grounded theory approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 857-884, April.
    14. Annie T. Chen, 2022. "Interactions between affect, cognition, and information behavior in the context of fibromyalgia," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(1), pages 31-44, January.
    15. repec:ris:cieodp:2013_016 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Roberti, Javier & Alonso, Juan Pedro & Blas, Leandro & May, Carl, 2022. "How do social and economic vulnerabilities shape the work of participating in care? Everyday experiences of people living with kidney failure in Argentina," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    17. Saleh Alkhodhair & Ahmed Alsanad & Khaled Alghathbar & Abdu Gumaei, 2020. "Key Quality Attributes for Computational and Sustainable Higher Education Strategy Implementation in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, March.
    18. Susan S. Harmeling & Saras D. Sarasvathy, 2013. "When Contingency is a Resource: Educating Entrepreneurs in the Balkans, the Bronx, and Beyond," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(4), pages 713-744, July.
    19. Hao Bin Jack Lai & Shahrim Karim, 2023. "Do-it-yourself menu management and pricing," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(6), pages 431-445, December.
    20. Mohammad Zarei, 2017. "Entrepreneurial Tournaments: Towards Disclosing the Rivalry Process Among Corporate Entrepreneurs," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(2), pages 33-57.
    21. Anne Spencer, 2000. "Testing the Additive Independence Assumption in the QALY Model," Working Papers 427, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:17-18:p:2528-2541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.