IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i13-14p1885-1894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Desperately seeking parenthood: neonatal nurses reflect on parental anguish

Author

Listed:
  • Janet Green
  • Philip Darbyshire
  • Anne Adams
  • Debra Jackson

Abstract

Aim and objective This paper aims to explore the ways in which neonatal nurses understand the experience of parents who have experienced infertility, conceived a baby via in vitro fertilisation and delivered an extremely premature infant. The chance of a poor long‐term outcome for the baby is significant; therefore, parental anguish plays out in the neonatal intensive care. Background Current literature suggests that infertility is a significant issue for ageing women and many couples experience multiple cycles of invitro‐fertilisation (IVF) treatment to achieve a pregnancy. Babies conceived through IVF are more likely to have genetic disorders, and be born prematurely. When the baby is born through IVF and is also born extremely prematurely, it creates a crisis situation for the parents. This paper will focus on the parental anguish of achieving a pregnancy through IVF to see the baby born extremely prematurely (defined as ≤ 24‐week gestation). It will examine parental anguish from caregiver perspective of the neonatal nurse who supports the parents through this very difficult time. Design This study used interviews with neonatal nurses, and drew insights from interpretative phenomenology. Methods This research used a combination of a questionnaire and a series of interviews in a qualitative study informed by phenomenology. The analysis of the interview data involved the creation of key themes following extensive coding of thematic statements and the analysis of the emerging themes. Results This paper outlines the neonatal nurses’ understanding of parental anguish and overwhelming sadness in parents whose baby was conceived by IVF, and was also born extremely prematurely. The theme of ‘seeking parenthood’ was synthesised from two sub‐themes – ‘longing for a baby’ and ‘the desperation to become parents’. Conclusion This study identified that neonatal nurses bear witness to parental anguish as their hopes of taking home a live baby might not be realised. The time, effort and money required to achieve a pregnancy does not mean that the baby will be spared the outcomes of extreme prematurity and the risk factors associated with IVF. The parents may be left empty handed. Therefore, the word precious becomes a metaphor for the IVF baby as the neonatal team try desperately to give the parents their much longed baby. Relevance to clinical practice Delayed child bearing has an impact on fertility, with maternal age having the most impact on the ability to conceive. Babies conceived through IVF technologies have a higher risk of genetic abnormalities and being born prematurely, and this will impact on the neonatal intensive care availability. Extreme prematurity and IVF can significantly impact on the baby's outcome. Witnessing parental anguish can be a major source of stress for the neonatal nurses. Neonatal nurses need to develop strategies not only to help the parents but also to prevent the parents’ overwhelming sadness from affecting their ability to function in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Suggested Citation

  • Janet Green & Philip Darbyshire & Anne Adams & Debra Jackson, 2015. "Desperately seeking parenthood: neonatal nurses reflect on parental anguish," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1885-1894, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:13-14:p:1885-1894
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12811
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12811?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Friese, Carrie & Becker, Gay & Nachtigall, Robert D., 2006. "Rethinking the biological clock: Eleventh-hour moms, miracle moms and meanings of age-related infertility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 1550-1560, September.
    2. Whiteford, Linda M. & Gonzalez, Lois, 1995. "Stigma: The hidden burden of infertility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 27-36, January.
    3. Gill Watson, 2011. "Parental liminality: a way of understanding the early experiences of parents who have a very preterm infant," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1462-1471, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Campbell, Patricia, 2011. "Boundaries and risk: Media framing of assisted reproductive technologies and older mothers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 265-272, January.
    2. Donkor, Ernestina S. & Sandall, Jane, 2007. "The impact of perceived stigma and mediating social factors on infertility-related stress among women seeking infertility treatment in Southern Ghana," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(8), pages 1683-1694, October.
    3. Nahar, Papreen, 2010. "Health seeking behaviour of childless women in Bangladesh: An ethnographic exploration for the special issue on: Loss in child bearing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(10), pages 1780-1787, November.
    4. Porter, Maureen & Bhattacharya, Siladitya & van Teijlingen, Edwin, 2006. "Unfulfilled expectations: How circumstances impinge on women's reproductive choices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 1757-1767, April.
    5. Krystal Wilkinson & Jennifer Tomlinson & Jean Gardiner, 2017. "Exploring the work–life challenges and dilemmas faced by managers and professionals who live alone," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(4), pages 640-656, August.
    6. Dua'a Fayiz Al Maghaireh & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Chong Mei Chan & Chua Yan Piaw & Mariam Mofleh Al Kawafha, 2016. "Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental experiences in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2745-2756, October.
    7. Degli Esposti, Sara & Pavone, Vincenzo, 2019. "Oocyte provision as a (quasi) social market: Insights from Spain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 234(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Engman, Athena, 2019. "Embodiment and the foundation of biographical disruption," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 120-127.
    9. Desy, Alexandra & Marre, Diana, 2024. "The reproductive journeys of French women over 40 seeking assisted reproductive technology treatments in Spain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    10. Alicja Malina & Dorota Suwalska-Barancewicz, 2021. "Comparison of Early-Stage Mothers and Childless Women Seeking Pregnancy: Experienced Stress, Resilience and Satisfaction with Relationship with the Partner," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Bell, Ann V., 2016. "The margins of medicalization: Diversity and context through the case of infertility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 39-46.
    12. Ulla Edéll‐Gustafsson & Charlotte Angelhoff & Ewa Johnsson & Jenny Karlsson & Evalotte Mörelius, 2015. "Hindering and buffering factors for parental sleep in neonatal care. A phenomenographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 717-727, March.
    13. Laya Farzadi & Aliyeh Ghasemzadeh & Zahra Bahrami-asl & Hossein Shirdel, 2015. "Predictors of Irrational Parenthood Cognitions in an Iranian Group of Infertile Women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-7, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:13-14:p:1885-1894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.