IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i9-10p1462-1471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental liminality: a way of understanding the early experiences of parents who have a very preterm infant

Author

Listed:
  • Gill Watson

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study was to explore the early experiences of parents who have a very preterm infant. Background. Very preterm infants are physiologically ill‐prepared for extra‐uterine life, but a greater number now survive birth and the postnatal period. The complex needs of the very preterm infant are met in the technological environment of the neonatal intensive care area, separating parents, physically and psychologically from their very preterm infant. Studies exploring the parental experience have identified parental stress; lowly parental status and attachment issues as areas of concern. However, there is little understanding about the early parental experience. Design. This study used a phenomenological interpretive design. Methods. Ethical approval to conduct this study using two study centres was obtained. An interpretive interactionist approach guided this study. Data were collected from three sources: 20 parents of very preterm infants, five senior neonatal nurses and seven neonatal intensive care nurses. Purposive sampling was used for the first and second sources, and data were collected through semi‐structured interviews. The third source of data occurred opportunistically through one focus group. Analysis. Analysis involved constant comparative analysis. Results. Crisis, uncertainty and powerlessness, properties of liminality framed this early complex parental transition. It is argued that the overarching theme of parental liminality best framed the parental physical, psychological and social experiences. Conclusion. This qualitative interpretive study identified that parents of very preterm infants experienced many crises, uncertainty and powerlessness in their transition to parenthood, making them liminal people. Relevance to clinical practice. Parental liminality provides a means of conceptualising the early experiences of parents of very preterm infants, providing practitioners, at strategic and operational levels, with the means of developing supporting interventions in the early stages of transition for parents of very preterm infants. Such support could mediate parent–infant relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Gill Watson, 2011. "Parental liminality: a way of understanding the early experiences of parents who have a very preterm infant," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1462-1471, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1462-1471
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03311.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03311.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03311.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janet Green & Philip Darbyshire & Anne Adams & Debra Jackson, 2015. "Desperately seeking parenthood: neonatal nurses reflect on parental anguish," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1885-1894, July.
    2. Dua'a Fayiz Al Maghaireh & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Chong Mei Chan & Chua Yan Piaw & Mariam Mofleh Al Kawafha, 2016. "Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental experiences in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2745-2756, October.
    3. Ulla Edéll‐Gustafsson & Charlotte Angelhoff & Ewa Johnsson & Jenny Karlsson & Evalotte Mörelius, 2015. "Hindering and buffering factors for parental sleep in neonatal care. A phenomenographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 717-727, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1462-1471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.