IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v63y2006i6p1550-1560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking the biological clock: Eleventh-hour moms, miracle moms and meanings of age-related infertility

Author

Listed:
  • Friese, Carrie
  • Becker, Gay
  • Nachtigall, Robert D.

Abstract

Over the past generation, aging and female reproduction have been lodged within the gendered and gendering debates regarding women's involvement in the workforce and demographic shifts toward delayed parenting that culminate in discourses on the "biological clock". Technological solutions to the biological clock, specifically in vitro fertilization, have led to clinical attempts to assess "ovarian reserve", or qualitative and quantitative changes in the ovary that correlate with aging and with successful infertility treatment. Rupturing the longstanding historical connections between menstruation and female reproductive capacity by specifically focusing on the aging of a woman's eggs, the clinical designation of "diminished ovarian reserve" has come to imply that a woman has "old eggs". This is associated in practitioners' and patients' minds with the eclipse of a woman's reproductive potential and with hidden harbingers of menopause. In an ethnographic interview study of 79 couples in the US who conceived after using donor oocytes, we found that women voiced two different narratives that described their experience and attitudes when confronted with an apparent age-related decline in their fertility. The "eleventh-hour mom" narrative was voiced by women who initially tried to become pregnant with their own eggs and turned to donated oocytes as a second-choice option, whereas the "miracle mom" narrative was expressed by women who were generally older, some of whom had entered infertility treatment hoping to conceive with their own eggs, but some who knew from the outset that it was not going to be possible. Through their narratives women not only embodied and made meaningful "diminished ovarian reserve" in varying ways that connect with cultural, social, structural/organizational, symbolic and physical aspects of aging, they reproduced the socio-biological project of the biological clock, but rooted this social project in the metaphor of "old eggs" rather than menopause.

Suggested Citation

  • Friese, Carrie & Becker, Gay & Nachtigall, Robert D., 2006. "Rethinking the biological clock: Eleventh-hour moms, miracle moms and meanings of age-related infertility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 1550-1560, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:63:y:2006:i:6:p:1550-1560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(06)00177-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Becker, Gay & Butler, Anneliese & Nachtigall, Robert D., 2005. "Resemblance talk: A challenge for parents whose children were conceived with donor gametes in the US," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1300-1309, September.
    2. McLean, Athena, 1990. "Contradictions in the social production of clinical knowledge: The case of schizophrenia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 969-985, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janet Green & Philip Darbyshire & Anne Adams & Debra Jackson, 2015. "Desperately seeking parenthood: neonatal nurses reflect on parental anguish," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1885-1894, July.
    2. Degli Esposti, Sara & Pavone, Vincenzo, 2019. "Oocyte provision as a (quasi) social market: Insights from Spain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 234(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Desy, Alexandra & Marre, Diana, 2024. "The reproductive journeys of French women over 40 seeking assisted reproductive technology treatments in Spain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    4. Campbell, Patricia, 2011. "Boundaries and risk: Media framing of assisted reproductive technologies and older mothers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 265-272, January.
    5. Krystal Wilkinson & Jennifer Tomlinson & Jean Gardiner, 2017. "Exploring the work–life challenges and dilemmas faced by managers and professionals who live alone," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(4), pages 640-656, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorenza Magliano & Corrado De Rosa & Andrea FIORILLO & Claudio Malangone & Manuela Guarneri & Cecilia Marasco & Mario Maj, 2004. "Beliefs of Psychiatric Nurses about Schizophrenia: A Comparison with Patients’ Relatives and Psychiatrists," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 50(4), pages 319-330, December.
    2. Bernard Ineichen, 1991. "Schizophrenia in British Afro-Caribbeans: Two Debates Confused?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 37(4), pages 227-232, December.
    3. Stephen Whyte & Benno Torgler, 2015. "Selection criteria in the search for a sperm donor: behavioural traits versus physical appearance," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 151-171, July.
    4. Nicky Hudson, 2017. "Making ‘Assisted World Families’? Parenting Projects and Family Practices in the Context of Globalised Gamete Donation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(2), pages 48-58, May.
    5. Grace, Victoria M. & Daniels, Ken R. & Gillett, Wayne, 2008. "The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents' constructions in the case of donor insemination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 301-314, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:63:y:2006:i:6:p:1550-1560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.