IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v31y2024i5p5012-5031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Connecting the dots: A systematic review of corporate social responsibility, information asymmetry, and economic implications

Author

Listed:
  • Yadong Wang
  • Khaldoon Albitar
  • Imad Chbib

Abstract

This paper conducts a comprehensive review of the theoretical and empirical connections between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Information Asymmetry (IA), and their economic consequences. It employs a bibliometric analysis on 73 Web of Science manuscripts using VOSviewer1.6.18 software, combining this analysis with a literature review. The results reveal four thematic areas categorized into three clusters: CSR and IA, the impact of CSR and IA on internal risk control and corporate performance, and the broader effects of CSR and IA. The systematic literature review finds a prevailing consensus that CSR can alleviate IA issues, leading to positive economic outcomes like increased stock liquidity, enhanced investment efficiency, and reduced cost of capital. This study's uniqueness lies in its integration of bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review to provide a holistic summary of both theoretical frameworks and the economic implications of the CSR‐IA relationship. It offers valuable insights and recommendations for future research in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Yadong Wang & Khaldoon Albitar & Imad Chbib, 2024. "Connecting the dots: A systematic review of corporate social responsibility, information asymmetry, and economic implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 5012-5031, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:5012-5031
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2843
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2843?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:5012-5031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.