IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v28y2021i3p1066-1077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate social responsibility corporate innovation: A cross‐country study of developing countries

Author

Listed:
  • Subhan Ullah
  • Di Sun

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between corporate social responsibility, corporate innovation, and corporate performance in developing countries. Firm level governance and corporate social responsibility data for 150 companies from 12 developing countries were collected from Datastream and Bloomberg for 2014–2019. The results show that in the context of developing countries there is no significant relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate innovation. Our findings raise concerns about the level of R&D investments and commitment to corporate social responsibilities in developing economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Subhan Ullah & Di Sun, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility corporate innovation: A cross‐country study of developing countries," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1066-1077, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:1066-1077
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2106
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathy Babiak & Sylvia Trendafilova, 2011. "CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 11-24, January.
    2. Justin J. P. Jansen & Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2006. "Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(11), pages 1661-1674, November.
    3. Brian R. Copeland & M. Scott Taylor, 2004. "Trade, Growth, and the Environment," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(1), pages 7-71, March.
    4. Huynh, Toan Luu Duc & Wu, Junjie & Duong, An Trong, 2020. "Information Asymmetry and firm value: Is Vietnam different?," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    5. Bryan W Husted & David B Allen, 2006. "Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 37(6), pages 838-849, November.
    6. Richard Welford, 2002. "Globalization, corporate social responsibility and human rights," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, March.
    7. Derek Bosworth & Mark Rogers, 2001. "Market Value, R&D and Intellectual Property: An Empirical Analysis of Large Australian Firms," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 77(239), pages 323-337, December.
    8. Sharma, Smriti & Tarp, Finn, 2018. "Does managerial personality matter? Evidence from firms in Vietnam," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 432-445.
    9. C. Christopher Baughn & Nancy L. (Dusty) Bodie & John C. McIntosh, 2007. "Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Asian countries and other geographical regions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 189-205, September.
    10. Del Monte, Alfredo & Papagni, Erasmo, 2003. "R&D and the growth of firms: empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1003-1014, June.
    11. Elsayed, Khaled & Paton, David, 2005. "The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: static and dynamic panel data evidence," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 395-412, September.
    12. Rachel Bocquet & Caroline Danièle Mothe, 2011. "Exploring the relationship between CSR and innovation: A comparison between small and largesized French companies," Post-Print hal-00919326, HAL.
    13. Eifert, Benn & Gelb, Alan & Ramachandran, Vijaya, 2008. "The Cost of Doing Business in Africa: Evidence from Enterprise Survey Data," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 1531-1546, September.
    14. Alexander Dahlsrud, 2008. "How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    15. Lei Wang & Heikki Juslin, 2009. "The Impact of Chinese Culture on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Harmony Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(3), pages 433-451, October.
    16. Sharma, Smriti & Tarp, Finn, 2018. "Does managerial personality matter? Evidence from firms in Vietnam," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 432-445.
    17. Peter Dobers, 2009. "Corporate social responsibility: management and methods," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 185-191, July.
    18. Muhammad Ali Nasir & Toan Luu Duc Huynh & Quynh Thi Nhu Do & Cuc Thi Nguyen & Quynh Thi Tran, 2020. "Implications of Government Borrowing for Corporate Financing in Emerging Economies: A Crowding Out Kuznets Curve," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 1-27, June.
    19. Shuili Du & C. B. Bhattacharya & Sankar Sen, 2011. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust Barrier," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(9), pages 1528-1545, March.
    20. Eva Grieshuber, 2013. "Innovation Through Corporate Social Responsibility?," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Thomas Osburg & René Schmidpeter (ed.), Social Innovation, edition 127, pages 197-206, Springer.
    21. Lopin Kuo & Chin‐Chen Yeh & Hui‐Cheng Yu, 2012. "Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management: Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5), pages 273-287, September.
    22. Sanjeev Bhojraj & Partha Sengupta, 2003. "Effect of Corporate Governance on Bond Ratings and Yields: The Role of Institutional Investors and Outside Directors," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 76(3), pages 455-476, July.
    23. repec:bla:ecorec:v:77:y:2001:i:239:p:323-37 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suyun Chen & Yu Ji, 2022. "Do Corporate Social Responsibility Categories Distinctly Influence Innovation? A Resource-Based Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Biktimirov, Ernest N. & Afego, Pyemo N., 2022. "Does investors’ valuation of corporate environmental activities vary between developed and emerging market firms?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    3. Feimei Liao & Yaoyao Hu & Songqin Ye, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility and green supply chain efficiency: conditioning effects based on CEO narcissism," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Qinglan Wu & Guifu Chen & Jing Han & Liyan Wu, 2022. "Does Corporate ESG Performance Improve Export Intensity? Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Arelys López‐Concepción & Ana I. Gil‐Lacruz & Isabel Saz‐Gil, 2022. "Stakeholder engagement, Csr development and Sdgs compliance: A systematic review from 2015 to 2021," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 19-31, January.
    6. Jesús J. Cambra‐Fierro & Mª. Eugenia López‐Pérez & Iguacel Melero‐Polo & Lourdes Pérez & Macarena Tejada‐Tejada, 2024. "Smart innovations for sustainable cities: Insights from a public‐private innovation ecosystem," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1654-1666, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bilal Afsar & Waheed Ali Umrani, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and pro‐environmental behavior at workplace: The role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 109-125, January.
    2. Sadia Cheema & Bilal Afsar & Basheer M. Al‐Ghazali & Ahsen Maqsoom, 2020. "Retracted: How employee's perceived corporate social responsibility affects employee's pro‐environmental behaviour? The influence of organizational identification, corporate entrepreneurship, and envi," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 616-629, March.
    3. Sadia Cheema & Bilal Afsar & Farheen Javed, 2020. "Employees' corporate social responsibility perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors for the environment: The mediating roles of organizational identification and environmental orientation ," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 9-21, January.
    4. Bilal Afsar & Basheer M. Al‐Ghazali & Zia Ur Rehman & Waheed Ali Umrani, 2020. "Retracted: The moderating effects of employee corporate social responsibility motive attributions (substantive and symbolic) between corporate social responsibility perceptions and voluntary pro‐envir," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 769-785, March.
    5. María del Mar Miras‐Rodríguez & Amalia Carrasco‐Gallego & Bernabé Escobar‐Pérez, 2015. "Are Socially Responsible Behaviors Paid Off Equally? A Cross‐cultural Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 237-256, July.
    6. Ruixin Su & Weizhou Zhong, 2022. "Corporate Communication of CSR in China: Characteristics and Regional Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Figueira, Sandra & Gauthier, Caroline & Torres de Oliveira, Rui, 2023. "CSR and stakeholder salience in MNE subsidiaries in emerging markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5).
    8. Theodore Metaxas & Maria Tsavdaridou, 2017. "Environmental Policy and CSR in Petroleum Refining Companies in Greece: Content and Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Analysis," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-29, September.
    9. Hyejoon Rim & Jisu Kim & Chuqing Dong, 2019. "A cross‐national comparison of transparency signaling in corporate social responsibility reporting: The United States, South Korea, and China cases," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1517-1529, November.
    10. Khojastehpour, Morteza & Shams, S.M. Riad, 2020. "Addressing the complexity of stakeholder management in international ecological setting: A CSR approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 302-309.
    11. Bargstädt, Dorothee, 2017. "Freiwillige Selbstverpflichtung von Unternehmen in Antikorruptionsinitiativen: Der Einfluss des nationalen Kontextes auf internationales Engagement am Beispiel chinesischer und indischer Unternehmen," PIPE - Papers on International Political Economy 28/2017, Free University Berlin, Center for International Political Economy.
    12. Nemlioglu, Ilayda & Mallick, Sushanta K., 2020. "Do innovation-intensive firms mitigate their valuation uncertainty during bad times?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 913-940.
    13. Jyotirani Gupta & Niladri Das, 2022. "Multidimensional corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial performance: A meta‐analytical review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 731-748, July.
    14. Monowar Mahmood & Janet Humphrey, 2013. "Stakeholder Expectation of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices: A Study on Local and Multinational Corporations in Kazakhstan," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), pages 168-181, May.
    15. Selin Türkel & Ebru Uzunoğlu & Melike Demirbağ Kaplan & Beril Akıncı Vural, 2016. "A Strategic Approach to CSR Communication: Examining the Impact of Brand Familiarity on Consumer Responses," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(4), pages 228-242, July.
    16. Weiwei Wu & Yexin Liu & Tachia Chin & Wenzhong Zhu, 2018. "Will Green CSR Enhance Innovation? A Perspective of Public Visibility and Firm Transparency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Weiwei Wu & Rizwan Ullah & Syed Jamal Shah, 2020. "Linking Corporate Environmental Performance to Financial Performance of Pakistani Firms: The Roles of Technological capability and Public awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Francisco J. López‐Arceiz & Cristina Del Río & Ana J. Bellostas, 2020. "Sustainability performance indicators: Definition, interaction, and influence of contextual characteristics," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2615-2630, November.
    19. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.
    20. Zhonghua Zhao & Fanchen Meng & Yin He & Zhouyang Gu, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Competitive Advantage with Multiple Mediations from Social Capital and Dynamic Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:1066-1077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.