IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v46y2024i1p189-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the payments from the coronavirus food assistance program and the market facilitation program to minority producers

Author

Listed:
  • Anil K. Giri
  • Dipak Subedi
  • Kathleen Kassel

Abstract

This paper examines the payments made to minority producers, focused on African American producers, from the COVID‐19 program, Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP), of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and compares it with one of the other more recent ad hoc program payments, the Market Facilitation Program (MFP). There were two rounds of the CFAP, and combinedly (as of March 2022), the program made direct payments of $31.0 billion ($11.8 billion from CFAP 1 and $19.2 billion from CFAP 2) starting in 2020. The MFP made a total payment of $23.5 billion (in two rounds, MFP 2018 and MFP 2019) to producers affected by the retaliatory tariffs placed on US producers by trade partners across multiple years. CFAP made almost $600 million in direct payments to minority producers, including Black or African American producers. Black or African American only producers received more than $52 million in CFAP payments. CFAP payments were proportional to the value of agricultural commodity sold for most minority producers. The 2017 Census of Agriculture showed that the majority of minority producers, including African American producers but excluding Asian producers, raised livestock. CFAP made the highest payments to livestock minority producers. The CFAP payment distribution pattern shows that payments reached minority producers who often did not receive Government payments. CFAP made more payments and as a share of total program outlays to minority producers compared to MFP. However, for Black or African American only producers, even though the magnitude increased (because CFAP disbursed more funds compared to MFP), the share of payment received did not increase.

Suggested Citation

  • Anil K. Giri & Dipak Subedi & Kathleen Kassel, 2024. "Analysis of the payments from the coronavirus food assistance program and the market facilitation program to minority producers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(1), pages 189-201, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:46:y:2024:i:1:p:189-201
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13325
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.13325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Escalante, Cesar L. & Brooks, Rodney L. & Epperson, James E. & Stegelin, Forrest E., 2006. "Credit Risk Assessment and Racial Minority Lending at the Farm Service Agency," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 61-75, April.
    2. Escalante, Cesar L. & Osinubi, Adenola & Dodson, Charles & Taylor, Carmina E., 2018. "Looking Beyond Farm Loan Approval Decisions: Loan Pricing And Nonpricing Terms For Socially Disadvantaged Farm Borrowers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 129-148, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Claudia Sant'Anna & Kevin N. Kim & Iryna Demko, 2024. "Limits to capital: Assessing the role of race on the Paycheck Protection Program for African American farmers in America," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(1), pages 217-233, March.
    2. Sant'Anna, Ana Claudia, 2023. "Examining the Relationship Between Women, Minority Farmers, and Diversity in the Leadership of Farm Credit Institutions," 97th Annual Conference, March 27-29, 2023, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 334564, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    3. Ashok K. Mishra & Gianna Short & Charles B. Dodson, 2024. "Racial disparities in farm loan application processing: Are Black farmers disadvantaged?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(1), pages 111-136, March.
    4. Tyler, Shakara S. & Moore, Eddie A., 2013. "Plight of Black Farmers in the Context of USDA Farm Loan Programs: A Research Agenda for the Future," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal (PAWJ), Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, vol. 1(1), pages 1-12.
    5. Tia M. McDonald & Ron Durst, 2024. "An analysis of tax benefits by race and ethnicity for farm households," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(2), pages 677-697, June.
    6. Dixon, Bruce L. & Ahrendsen, Bruce L. & Nwoha, Ogbonnaya John & Hamm, Sandra J. & Danforth, Diana M., 2007. "FSA Direct Farm Loan Program Graduation Rates and Reasons for Exiting," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 39(3), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Bruce L. Dixon & Bruce L. Ahrendsen & Brandon R. McFadden & Diana M. Danforth & Monica Foianini & Sandra J. Hamm, 2011. "Competing risks models of Farm Service Agency seven‐year direct operating loans," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 71(1), pages 5-24, May.
    8. Escalante, Cesar L. & Epperson, James E. & Raghunathan, Uthra, 2008. "Investigating Gender Bias in Farm Service Agency’s Lending Decisions," 2007 Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition, October 4-5, 2007, St. Louis, Missouri 48144, Regional Research Committee NC-1014: Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition.
    9. Quaye, Frederick & Hartarska, Valentina & Nadolnyak, Denis, 2015. "Farmer Credit Delinquency in Southeastern US: Factors and Behavior Prediction," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196914, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    10. Cesar L. Escalante & Penghui Gao & William Secor, 2024. "Loan packaging decisions for beginning African American and other socially disadvantaged farmers," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 83(1), pages 109-126, January.
    11. Wu, Ya & Escalante, Cesar L. & Gunter, Lewell F. & Epperson, James E., 2009. "A Decomposition Approach To Analyzing Racial And Gender Biases," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49308, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Dhakal, Chandra K. & Escalante, Cesar L., 2018. "Heterogeneity of Farm Loan Packaging Term Decisions: A Finite Mixture Model Approach," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274118, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. repec:ags:aaea22:337402 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Escalante, Cesar L. & Epperson, James E. & Raghunathan, Uthra, 2009. "Gender Bias Claims in Farm Service Agency’s Lending Decisions," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(2), pages 1-18, August.
    15. Landerito, Aiko O. & Dixon, Bruce L. & Ahrendsen, Bruce L. & Hamm, Sandra J. & Danforth, Diana M., 2009. "Analyzing FSA Direct Loan Borrower Payback Histories: Predictors of Financial Improvement and Loan Servicing Actions," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49340, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:46:y:2024:i:1:p:189-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.