IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wfo/monber/y2002i2p121-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Steuerliche Förderung von Forschung und Entwicklung

Author

Listed:
  • Gernot Hutschenreiter

    (WIFO)

Abstract

Die direkte und die steuerliche Förderung von Forschung und Entwicklung haben ihre spezifischen Vor- und Nachteile. Ein den jeweiligen Bedingungen angepasster Mix kann die Effektivität des Förderungssystems erhöhen. Tatsächlich unterstützt die Mehrzahl der OECD-Länder F&E sowohl mittels direkter Förderungen als auch zunehmend durch steuerliche Anreize. Die EU widmet steuerlichen Anreizen für F&E derzeit erhöhte Aufmerksamkeit. Österreich verfügt mit dem Forschungsfreibetrag seit längerem über ein im internationalen Vergleich durchaus generöses Instrument der steuerlichen F&E-Förderung. In seiner derzeitigen Form weist der Forschungsfreibetrag jedoch einige Schwachpunkte auf. Die derzeit als Gesetzesentwurf vorliegende Reform der steuerlichen Forschungsförderung sieht die Beseitigung einiger dieser Schwächen durch zusätzliche Maßnahmen vor (neuer Forschungsfreibetrag für F&E-Ausgaben laut OECD-Definition, Forschungsprämie für Unternehmen ohne hinreichende Gewinne). Durch diese Neugestaltung der steuerlichen F&E-Förderung wird kein Unternehmen schlechter gestellt. Dem steht gegenüber, dass das Instrumentarium zunehmend kompliziert wird und damit die Administrationskosten und "Compliance"-Kosten der Unternehmen steigen. Auch im Interesse des Standort-Marketing wären einfach vermittelbare steuerliche Anreize zu bevorzugen. Bislang war die tatsächliche Nutzung und Wirkung des Forschungsfreibetrags wenig transparent, eine Evaluierung wurde nicht vorgelegt. Die Transparenz der steuerlichen F&E-Förderung sollte daher erhöht und das neu gestaltete Instrumentarium nach drei Jahren gemäß internationalen Standards evaluiert werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Gernot Hutschenreiter, 2002. "Steuerliche Förderung von Forschung und Entwicklung," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 75(2), pages 121-131, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2002:i:2:p:121-131
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/21333
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Payment required
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bronwyn Hall, 1992. "R&D Tax Policy During the Eighties: Success or Failure?," NBER Working Papers 4240, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Harhoff, Dietmar, 1994. "Zur steuerlichen Behandlung von Forschungs- und Entwicklungsaufwendungen: Eine internationale Bestandsaufnahme," ZEW Dokumentationen 94-02, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. McCutchen, William Jr., 1993. "Estimating the impact of the R&D tax credit on strategic groups in the pharmaceutical industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 337-351, August.
    4. James R. Hines, Jr., 1995. "Taxes, Technology Transfer, and the R&D Activities of Multinational Firms," NBER Chapters, in: The Effects of Taxation on Multinational Corporations, pages 225-252, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Dominique Guellec & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, 2003. "The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 225-243.
    6. Mansfield, Edwin, 1986. "The R&D Tax Credit and Other Technology Policy Issues," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 190-194, May.
    7. Lerner, Josh, 1999. "The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Impact of the SBIR Program," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(3), pages 285-318, July.
    8. Pierre Mohnen, 1999. "Tax Incentives: Issue and Evidence," CIRANO Working Papers 99s-32, CIRANO.
    9. Cordes, Joseph J., 1989. "Tax incentives and R&D spending: A review of the evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 119-133, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Russell Thomson, 2010. "Tax Policy and R&D Investment by Australian Firms," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 86(273), pages 260-280, June.
    2. Mamuneas, Theofanis P. & Ishaq Nadiri, M., 1996. "Public R&D policies and cost behavior of the US manufacturing industries," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 57-81, December.
    3. Ali-Yrkkö, Jyrki, 2004. "Impact of Public R&D Financing on Private R&D - Does Financial Constraint Matter?," Discussion Papers 943, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    4. Dominique Guellec & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, 2003. "The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 225-243.
    5. Duch, Néstor & Montolio, Daniel & Mediavilla , Mauro, 2009. "Evaluating the impact of public subsidies on a firm’s performance: a two-stage quasi-experimental approach," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 16, pages 143-165.
    6. Christof Ernst & Katharina Richter & Nadine Riedel, 2014. "Corporate taxation and the quality of research and development," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 21(4), pages 694-719, August.
    7. Hall, Bronwyn & Van Reenen, John, 2000. "How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 449-469, April.
    8. Bruno Van Pottelsberghe & Steve Nysten & Esmeralda Megally, 2003. "Evaluation of current fiscal incentives for business R&D in Belgium," Working Papers CEB 03-011.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Robert Atkinson, 2007. "Expanding the R&E tax credit to drive innovation, competitiveness and prosperity," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 617-628, December.
    10. Dagenais, Marcel & Mohnen, Pierre & Therrien, Pierre, 2004. "Les firmes canadiennes répondent-elles aux incitations fiscales à la recherche-développement?," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 80(2), pages 175-205, Juin-Sept.
    11. Emmanuel Duguet, 2008. "L’effet du credit d’impôt recherche sur le financement privé de la recherche : une évaluation économétrique," Documents de recherche 08-08, Centre d'Études des Politiques Économiques (EPEE), Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne.
    12. A. Minniti & F. Venturini, 2014. "R&D Policy and Schumpeterian Growth: Theory and Evidence," Working Papers wp945, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    13. Pierre-André Buigues & Khalid Sekkat, 2011. "Public Subsidies to Business: An International Comparison," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Athukorala, Prema-chandra & Kohpaiboon, Archanun, 2010. "Globalization of R&D by US-based multinational enterprises," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1335-1347, December.
    15. José Ángel Zúñiga-Vicente & César Alonso-Borrego & Francisco J. Forcadell & José I. Galán, 2014. "Assessing The Effect Of Public Subsidies On Firm R&D Investment: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 36-67, February.
    16. Marcel Dagenais & Pierre Mohnen & Pierre Therrien, 1997. "Do Canadian Firms Respond to Fiscal Incentives to Research and Development?," CIRANO Working Papers 97s-34, CIRANO.
    17. Feldman, Maryann P. & Kelley, Maryellen R., 2006. "The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 1509-1521, December.
    18. Jorge Niosi, 2010. "Building National and Regional Innovation Systems," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14006.
    19. Russell Thomson, 2013. "The Effectiveness of R&D Tax Credits: Cross-Industry Evidence," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2013n18, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    20. Pierre Mohnen, 1999. "Tax Incentives: Issue and Evidence," CIRANO Working Papers 99s-32, CIRANO.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2002:i:2:p:121-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.