IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/subboe/v64y2019i3p54-68n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship Between Selected Market Orientation Dimensions and Organizational Performance within Universities in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Mokoena Bakae Aubrey

    (Vaal University of Technology, South Africa)

Abstract

The association of market orientation and organisation performance has been the focal point of several studies that confirmed a positive relationship between the constructs. However, there is a lack of evidence in studies examining this issue within universities of technology (UoTs) in South Africa. Hence, the study was undertaken with the main objective of conducting an analysis on the dimensions of MARKOR scale of market orientation in the prediction of university performance within UoTs in South Africa. Both the resource based view theory and the dynamic capacity theory were identified as the foundation of the study. Considering the situational factors and the institutions’ environment, a non-probability sampling procedure was chosen. A convenience sample of 507 full-time employed academics within the six UoTs in South Africa, participated in a cross-sectional survey through a self-administered structured questionnaire. The factor analysis procedure resulted in the extraction of three primary dimensions, namely market information generation, market information dissemination and responsiveness. A conceptual research model was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Through multiple regression analysis, the results show that market information generation, market information dissemination and responsiveness are significant predictors of university performance. The findings contribute to an enhanced comprehension of the dimensions of MARKOR scale towards predicting university performance among UoTs in South Africa. The study provides possible recommendations and extends immensely the existing knowledge among researched concepts when measuring organisational performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Mokoena Bakae Aubrey, 2019. "The Relationship Between Selected Market Orientation Dimensions and Organizational Performance within Universities in South Africa," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 64(3), pages 54-68, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:subboe:v:64:y:2019:i:3:p:54-68:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/subboec-2019-0015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/subboec-2019-0015
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/subboec-2019-0015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Faiz Muhammad Khuwaja & Hasnizam Bin Shaari & Lily Julienti Abu Bakar, 2017. "Market Orientation: An important Consideration for Higher Education of Pakistan," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 419-436, April.
    2. Neil A. Morgan & Douglas W. Vorhies & Charlotte H. Mason, 2009. "Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 909-920, August.
    3. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    4. Hamada Fawzy Thabet Abuzid & Muzaffar Abbas, 2017. "Banks Performance and Impact of Market Orientation Strategy: Do Employee Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty Augment this Relationship?," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 60-66.
    5. Kuosmanen, Timo & Kuosmanen, Natalia, 2009. "How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 235-243, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    2. İpek, İlayda & Bıçakcıoğlu-Peynirci, Nilay, 2020. "Export market orientation: An integrative review and directions for future research," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    3. Andreas Engelen & Jan Kemper & Malte Brettel, 2010. "Die Wirkung von operativen Marketing-Mix-Fähigkeiten auf den Unternehmenserfolg — Ein 4-Länder-Vergleich," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 62(7), pages 710-743, November.
    4. Bhattarai, Charan Raj & Kwong, Caleb C.Y. & Tasavori, Misagh, 2019. "Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 47-60.
    5. Caroline Reimann & Fernando Carvalho & Marcelo Duarte, 2021. "The Influence of Dynamic and Adaptive Marketing Capabilities on the Performance of Portuguese SMEs in the B2B International Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    6. John Mugambwa Serumaga-Zake & John Andrew van der Poll, 2021. "Addressing the Impact of Fourth Industrial Revolution on South African Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Liu, Yi & Liao, Yonghai & Li, Yuan, 2018. "Capability configuration, ambidexterity and performance: Evidence from service outsourcing sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 343-352.
    8. Soluk, Jonas & Decker-Lange, Carolin & Hack, Andreas, 2023. "Small steps for the big hit: A dynamic capabilities perspective on business networks and non-disruptive digital technologies in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Muhammad Shahid Qureshi & Nergis Aziz & Sarfraz A. Mian, 2017. "How marketing capabilities shape entrepreneurial firm’s performance? Evidence from new technology based firms in turkey," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Zhang, Haisu & Wu, Fang & Cui, Anna Shaojie, 2015. "Balancing market exploration and market exploitation in product innovation: A contingency perspective," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 297-308.
    11. Xi’na Yuan & Sohyoun Shin & Xinming He & Sang Yong Kim, 2016. "Innovation capability, marketing capability and firm performance: A two-nation study of China and Korea," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(1), pages 32-56, February.
    12. Ho, Hillbun (Dixon) & Lu, Ruichang, 2015. "Performance implications of marketing exploitation and exploration: Moderating role of supplier collaboration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1026-1034.
    13. Ying Ye & Kwok Hung Lau, 2022. "Competitive Green Supply Chain Transformation with Dynamic Capabilities—An Exploratory Case Study of Chinese Electronics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    14. Johnson, William H.A. & Bicen, Pelin & Zhu, Zhen, 2023. "Being lean: Conceptualizing and operationalizing the Lean Innovation Capability (LIC) of innovative companies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    15. Man Zhang & Patriya Tansuhaj & James McCullough, 2009. "International entrepreneurial capability: The measurement and a comparison between born global firms and traditional exporters in China," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 292-322, December.
    16. Rosa Maria Dangelico & Devashish Pujari & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2017. "Green Product Innovation in Manufacturing Firms: A Sustainability‐Oriented Dynamic Capability Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 490-506, May.
    17. Najafi-Tavani, Saeed & Sharifi, Hossein & Najafi-Tavani, Zhaleh, 2016. "Market orientation, marketing capability, and new product performance: The moderating role of absorptive capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5059-5064.
    18. Samppa Suoniemi & Lars Meyer-Waarden & Andreas Munzel & Alex Ricardo Zablah & Detmar Straub, 2020. "Big data and firm performance: The roles of market-directed capabilities and business strategy," Post-Print hal-02957479, HAL.
    19. Ng, Stephen C.H. & Rungtusanatham, Johnny M. & Zhao, Xiande & Lee, T.S., 2015. "Examining process management via the lens of exploitation and exploration: Reconceptualization and scale development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-15.
    20. Björn Michaelis & Shalini Rogbeer & Lars Schweizer & Zafer Özleblebici, 2021. "Clarifying the boundary conditions of value creation within dynamic capabilities framework: a grafting approach," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1797-1820, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    University performance; Market information generation; Market information dissemination and responsiveness;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M30 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - General
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M39 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Other
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:subboe:v:64:y:2019:i:3:p:54-68:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.