IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v17y2023i1p1286-1296n46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of an Integrated Quality Management System in Improving Performance in the Port Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Ungureanu Andreea Maria

    (University Politehnica of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Doicin Cristian Vasile

    (University Politehnica of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Stanca Costel

    (Constanta Maritime University, Constanta, Romania)

  • Titu Aurel Mihail

    (“Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania)

Abstract

The scientific paper aims to present the performance evaluation methods in ports and port organizations and the contributions that an integrated quality management system can bring. Water transport is the most reliable mode of transport, both in terms of transport capacity and in terms of consumption and environmental aspects, compared to other modes of transport. But it cannot function at an optimal level without complex and permanent on-shore management. The port organizations have an important contribution in the global performance of the port and thus in the economy of a country that is open to the sea. By approaching an integrated quality management system, port organizations can achieve the expected performance in a planned and systemic way in terms of quality, environment, logistics supply chain security, etc. The paper analyzes the performance assess in ports and port organizations, the most common applied regulations and management systems in port organizations and the advantages an integrated quality management system brings in increasing organizational performance by preventing losses and improving processes using known methodologies globally promoted such as Lean. It also highlights the relationship of mutual dependence that the port performance and the port organizations performance have on each other.

Suggested Citation

  • Ungureanu Andreea Maria & Doicin Cristian Vasile & Stanca Costel & Titu Aurel Mihail, 2023. "The Role of an Integrated Quality Management System in Improving Performance in the Port Organization," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1286-1296, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:1286-1296:n:46
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2023-0115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0115
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2023-0115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary R. Brooks & Athanasios A. Pallis, 2008. "Assessing port governance models: process and performance components," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 411-432, August.
    2. Jean-François Arvis & Vincent Vesin & Robin Carruthers & César Ducruet & Peter de Langen, 2019. "Maritime Networks, Port Efficiency, and Hinterland Connectivity in the Mediterranean," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 30585.
    3. Vivien Lorenčič & Elen Twrdy & Marjan Lep, 2022. "Cruise Port Performance Evaluation in the Context of Port Authority: An MCDA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Cunha Marques & Álvaro Fonseca, 2010. "Market structure, privatisation and regulation of Portuguese seaports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 145-161, March.
    2. Zhang, Qiang & Zheng, Shiyuan & Geerlings, Harry & El Makhloufi, Abdel, 2019. "Port governance revisited: How to govern and for what purpose?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 46-57.
    3. Moreira, Paulo Pires, 2012. "A Análise De Sines Como Ativo Geoestratégico Nacional: Um Cluster Suportado Nas Redes Marítimas Mundiais [The Analysis of Sines as a Geostrategic Asset: A Cluster Supported in the Maritime Chain]," MPRA Paper 47694, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Oct 2012.
    4. Laure Rousset & César Ducruet, 2020. "Disruptions in Spatial Networks: a Comparative Study of Major Shocks Affecting Ports and Shipping Patterns," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 423-447, June.
    5. de Langen, P.W. & Heij, C., 2013. "Performance Effects of the Corporatisation of Port of Rotterdam Authority," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2013-06, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    6. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    7. Aldery Silveira Junior & Rafael Rabelo Nunes, 2022. "Assessment of the Satisfaction Level of Users of Brazilian Cabotage—Containerized Cargo Segment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Ducruet, César, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Lilian Loubet & Géraldine del Mondo & Julius Bañgate & Eric Sanlaville & Pierrick Tranouez, 2024. "Modelling the governance of European medium-sized port-cities [Modélisation de la gouvernance des villes portuaires européennes de taille moyenne]," Post-Print hal-04154472, HAL.
    10. Jean Debrie, 2010. "Different tiers of government in port governance: some general remarks on the institutional geography of ports in Europe and Canada," Post-Print hal-00615146, HAL.
    11. Zhang, Qiang & Geerlings, Harry & El Makhloufi, Abdel & Chen, Shun, 2018. "Who governs and what is governed in port governance: A review study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 51-60.
    12. Tsakiridis, Andreas & Mateo-Mantecón, Ingrid & O'Connor, Eamonn & Hynes, Stephen & O'Donoghue, Cathal, 2021. "Efficiency benchmarking of Irish and North Atlantic Spanish ports: Implications for blue growth," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Chen, Jihong & Wan, Zheng & Zhang, Fangwei & Park, Nam-kyu & Zheng, Aibing & Zhao, Jun, 2018. "Evaluation and comparison of the development performances of typical free trade port zones in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 506-526.
    14. Wided Bedoui & Mame Gningue, 2019. "An integrated performance monitoring model based on port stakeholders perceptions [Modèle de pilotage de la performance globale basé sur les perceptions des parties prenantes portuaires]," Post-Print hal-02901541, HAL.
    15. Shiyuan Zheng & Rudy R Negenborn, 2018. "Design of port regulation mechanisms for multilayer governance: A shanghai case study," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(1), pages 89-111, March.
    16. Debrie, Jean & Lavaud-Letilleul, Valérie & Parola, Francesco, 2013. "Shaping port governance: the territorial trajectories of reform," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 56-65.
    17. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-04154472 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Edvard Tijan & Marija Jović & Ana Panjako & Dražen Žgaljić, 2021. "The Role of Port Authority in Port Governance and Port Community System Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Tocchi, Daniela & Sys, Christa & Papola, Andrea & Tinessa, Fiore & Simonelli, Fulvio & Marzano, Vittorio, 2022. "Hypergraph-based centrality metrics for maritime container service networks: A worldwide application," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    20. Moreira, Paulo Pires, 2013. "The port of Sines:contribution for the emergence of a regional cluster," MPRA Paper 47719, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Adolf K Y Ng & Athanasios A Pallis, 2010. "Port Governance Reforms in Diversified Institutional Frameworks: Generic Solutions, Implementation Asymmetries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(9), pages 2147-2167, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:1286-1296:n:46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.