IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12325-d674559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adriatic Sea Hub Ports Feeder Service Optimization Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Dario Medić

    (Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Split, Ruđera Boškovića 37, 21000 Split, Croatia)

  • Srećko Krile

    (Maritime Department, University of Dubrovnik, Branitelja Dubrovnika 29, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia)

  • Igor Jelaska

    (Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, Teslina 6, 21000 Split, Croatia)

  • Rino Bošnjak

    (Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Split, Ruđera Boškovića 37, 21000 Split, Croatia)

Abstract

From a scientific viewpoint, as well as from the perspective of navigation practice, it is clear that the Adriatic Sea feeder service is relatively underdeveloped. Hence, the objective of this study is to suggest a model for selecting the hub port and to optimize the network of seaports engaged in the feeder service. Accordingly, an appropriate hub port has been identified through the methods of multi-criteria decision making and expert assessment, and the optimum shipping route has been calculated by applying the travelling salesman algorithm (TSA). In order to analyze whether there is a possibility of obtaining better optimization results, an integration of a sub-hub port system is suggested. Optimization has been achieved by applying a minimum spanning tree algorithm (MST) and a combination of these algorithms. The proposed methodology for selecting the hub port, sub-hub port and optimizing the feeder network can be implemented globally. The practical application of the achieved model would result in cost minimization, owing to shorter shipping routes or a combination of different transportation means (feeders).

Suggested Citation

  • Dario Medić & Srećko Krile & Igor Jelaska & Rino Bošnjak, 2021. "Adriatic Sea Hub Ports Feeder Service Optimization Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12325-:d:674559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12325/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12325/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrigue, Jean-Paul & Notteboom, Theo, 2010. "Foreland-based regionalization: Integrating intermediate hubs with port hinterlands," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 19-29.
    2. Taş, Duygu & Gendreau, Michel & Jabali, Ola & Laporte, Gilbert, 2016. "The traveling salesman problem with time-dependent service times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 372-383.
    3. Changmin Jiang & Yulai Wan & Anming Zhang, 2017. "Internalization of port congestion: strategic effect behind shipping line delays and implications for terminal charges and investment," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 112-130, January.
    4. Wu, Yen-Chun Jim & Goh, Mark, 2010. "Container port efficiency in emerging and more advanced markets," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1030-1042, November.
    5. Theo E Notteboom, 2006. "The Time Factor in Liner Shipping Services," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 8(1), pages 19-39, March.
    6. Olcay Polat & Hans-Otto Günther & Osman Kulak, 2014. "The feeder network design problem: Application to container services in the Black Sea region," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 16(3), pages 343-369, September.
    7. Dai, Liang & Derudder, Ben & Liu, Xingjian, 2018. "Transport network backbone extraction: A comparison of techniques," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 271-281.
    8. Christian Artigues & Dominique Feillet, 2008. "A branch and bound method for the job-shop problem with sequence-dependent setup times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 135-159, March.
    9. Stefan Poikonen & Bruce Golden & Edward A. Wasil, 2019. "A Branch-and-Bound Approach to the Traveling Salesman Problem with a Drone," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 335-346, April.
    10. Shrivastava, Prabhat & O'Mahony, Margaret, 2006. "A model for development of optimized feeder routes and coordinated schedules--A genetic algorithms approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 413-425, September.
    11. Jean-François Arvis & Vincent Vesin & Robin Carruthers & César Ducruet & Peter de Langen, 2019. "Maritime Networks, Port Efficiency, and Hinterland Connectivity in the Mediterranean," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 30585.
    12. Asgari, Nasrin & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Goh, Mark, 2013. "Network design approach for hub ports-shipping companies competition and cooperation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-18.
    13. Ondrej STOPKA & Mária STOPKOVÁ & Vladimír ĽUPTÁK & Srećko KRILE, 2020. "Application Of The Chosen Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods To Identify The Autonomous Train System Supplier," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 15(2), pages 45-57, June.
    14. Julián Martínez Moya & María Feo Valero, 2017. "Port choice in container market: a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 300-321, May.
    15. Chathumi Kavirathna & Tomoya Kawasaki & Shinya Hanaoka & Takuma Matsuda, 2018. "Transshipment hub port selection criteria by shipping lines: the case of hub ports around the bay of Bengal," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William Costa & Britaldo Soares-Filho & Rodrigo Nobrega, 2022. "Can the Brazilian National Logistics Plan Induce Port Competitiveness by Reshaping the Port Service Areas?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laure Rousset & César Ducruet, 2020. "Disruptions in Spatial Networks: a Comparative Study of Major Shocks Affecting Ports and Shipping Patterns," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 423-447, June.
    2. Julián Martinez-Moya & Amparo Mestre-Alcover & Ramon Sala-Garrido, 2024. "Connectivity and competitiveness of the major Mediterranean container ports using ‘Benefit-of-the-Doubt’ and ‘Common Sets of Weights’ methods in Data Envelopment Analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(2), pages 261-282, June.
    3. Jagan Jeevan & Violeta Roso, 2019. "Exploring seaport - dry ports dyadic integration to meet the increase in container vessels size," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Wang, Shuaian & Qu, Xiaobo & Yang, Ying, 2015. "Estimation of the perceived value of transit time for containerized cargoes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 298-308.
    5. Theo Notteboom & Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2012. "The corporate geography of global container terminal operators," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 249-279, May.
    6. Ducruet, César, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Song, Zhuzhu & Tang, Wansheng & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2018. "Cooperation mode for a liner company with heterogeneous ports: Business cooperation vs. port investment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 513-533.
    8. César Ducruet & Hidekazu Itoh, 2022. "Spatial Network Analysis of Container Port Operations: The Case of Ship Turnaround Times," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 883-902, December.
    9. Tocchi, Daniela & Sys, Christa & Papola, Andrea & Tinessa, Fiore & Simonelli, Fulvio & Marzano, Vittorio, 2022. "Hypergraph-based centrality metrics for maritime container service networks: A worldwide application," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Wang, Junjin & Liu, Jiaguo & Wang, Fan & Yue, Xiaohang, 2021. "Blockchain technology for port logistics capability: Exclusive or sharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 347-392.
    11. Felipe Lobo Umbelino Souza & Cira Souza Pitombo & Dong Yang, 2021. "Port choice in Brazil: a qualitative research related to in-depth interviews," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Nguyen Khoi Tran & Hans-Dietrich Haasis & Tobias Buer, 2017. "Container shipping route design incorporating the costs of shipping, inland/feeder transport, inventory and CO2 emission," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(4), pages 667-694, December.
    13. Notteboom, Theo E., 2012. "Towards a new intermediate hub region in container shipping? Relay and interlining via the Cape route vs. the Suez route," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 164-178.
    14. Mohammad Ghorbani & Michele Acciaro & Sandra Transchel & Pierre Cariou, 2022. "Strategic alliances in container shipping: A review of the literature and future research agenda," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 439-465, June.
    15. César Ducruet & Hidekazu Itoh, 2022. "Spatial network analysis of container port operations: the case of ship turnaround times," EconomiX Working Papers 2022-15, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    16. César Ducruet, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Post-Print halshs-02922543, HAL.
    17. Guo, Liquan & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Jiang, Changmin & Long, Jiancheng, 2021. "Stepwise capacity integration in port cluster under uncertainty and congestion," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 94-113.
    18. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    19. Lee, Chung-Yee & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 442-474.
    20. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12325-:d:674559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.