IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/josatr/v7y2022i1d10.1186_s41072-021-00103-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transparency in port governance: setting a research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Mary R. Brooks

    (Dalhousie University)

  • Geraldine Knatz

    (University of Southern California)

  • Athanasios A. Pallis

    (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)

  • Gordon Wilmsmeier

    (Universidad de Los Andes
    Kühne Logistics University (KLU))

Abstract

This study examines the concept of transparency as practiced (or not) in ports. It explores the availability of information to the general public and port stakeholders through the ports’ most public face—its website, studying public ports in North America, Europe, and Latin America and the Caribbean. This exploratory research centred on identifying the parameters that would be useful for the general public to have sufficient information to monitor, review and in many cases, participate in the decision-making processes carried out by the port authority, irrespective of whether or not laws mandate such disclosure. Fifty-one items were identified for the examination of each port’s website, focusing primarily on four major categories: decision-making governance, port communications and accessibility, transparency in reporting and in port operational activities. Using nine items as proxies for the 51, the research reveals uneven levels of port transparency both regionally and by governance model. The study reveals a need for increasing and differentiating the existing levels and standards of transparency in the governance of the port industry, and for greater consistency between ports within and across regions. The study concludes with a research agenda for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary R. Brooks & Geraldine Knatz & Athanasios A. Pallis & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2022. "Transparency in port governance: setting a research agenda," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:7:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-021-00103-4
    DOI: 10.1186/s41072-021-00103-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s41072-021-00103-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s41072-021-00103-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Hood, 2007. "What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 191-210, June.
    2. Aarti Gupta, 2008. "Transparency Under Scrutiny: Information Disclosure in Global Environmental Governance," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 8(2), pages 1-7, May.
    3. Eijffinger, Sylvester C.W. & Geraats, Petra M., 2006. "How transparent are central banks?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Mary R. Brooks & Athanasios A. Pallis, 2008. "Assessing port governance models: process and performance components," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 411-432, August.
    5. Brooks, Mary R., 2006. "Chapter 11 Port Devolution and Governance in Canada," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 237-257, January.
    6. Vladislav Valentinov & Gert Verschraegen & Kristof Van Assche, 2019. "The limits of transparency: A systems theory view," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 289-300, May.
    7. Patrick Verhoeven & Thomas Vanoutrive, 2012. "A quantitative analysis of European port governance," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 14(2), pages 178-203, June.
    8. Robert M. Bushman & Joseph D. Piotroski & Abbie J. Smith, 2004. "What Determines Corporate Transparency?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 207-252, May.
    9. Adolf K Y Ng & Athanasios A Pallis, 2010. "Port Governance Reforms in Diversified Institutional Frameworks: Generic Solutions, Implementation Asymmetries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(9), pages 2147-2167, September.
    10. Notteboom, Theo & De Langen, Peter & Jacobs, Wouter, 2013. "Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 26-35.
    11. Forssbaeck, Jens & Oxelheim, Lars, 2014. "The Oxford Handbook of Economic and Institutional Transparency," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199917693.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sphiwe Eugene Mthembu & Mihalis Chasomeris, 2023. "An evaluation of the governance structure of marine services in South Africa’s ports system," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Brigitte Daudet & Yann Alix, 2024. "Port governance: Practical considerations on the concept of compromise [Gouvernance portuaire : Réflexions opérationnelles sur le concept de compromis]," Post-Print hal-04624677, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Qiang & Geerlings, Harry & El Makhloufi, Abdel & Chen, Shun, 2018. "Who governs and what is governed in port governance: A review study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 51-60.
    2. Castillo-Manzano, José I. & Castro-Nuño, Mercedes & González-Laxe, Fernando & Pedregal, Diego J., 2018. "Legal reform and the devolution of the Spanish Port System: An econometric assessment," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 73-82.
    3. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-04154472 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. VAN DE VOORDE, Eddy & VERHOEVEN, Patrick, 2014. "The economics of port authority reform. A framework for ex-post evaluation," Working Papers 2014017, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    5. Sheng-Che Lin & Hsien-Kuo Chang & Ying-Feng Chung, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Different Port Governances on Smart Port Development Strategy in Taiwan and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    6. de Langen, P.W. & Heij, C., 2013. "Performance Effects of the Corporatisation of Port of Rotterdam Authority," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2013-06, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    7. Li, J.Y. & Notteboom, T.E. & Jacobs, W., 2014. "China in transition: institutional change at work in inland waterway transport on the Yangtze River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 17-28.
    8. Fernando González Laxe & Ricardo J. Sánchez & Lorena Garcia-Alonso, 2016. "The adaptation process in port governance: the case of the Latin countries in South America and Europe," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Zhang, Qiang & Zheng, Shiyuan & Geerlings, Harry & El Makhloufi, Abdel, 2019. "Port governance revisited: How to govern and for what purpose?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 46-57.
    10. Moreira, Paulo Pires, 2012. "A Análise De Sines Como Ativo Geoestratégico Nacional: Um Cluster Suportado Nas Redes Marítimas Mundiais [The Analysis of Sines as a Geostrategic Asset: A Cluster Supported in the Maritime Chain]," MPRA Paper 47694, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Oct 2012.
    11. Adolf K. Y. Ng & Kenneth Wong & Eva C. Shou & Changmin Jiang, 2019. "Geography and institutional change: insights from a container terminal operator," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(3), pages 334-352, September.
    12. Lilian Loubet & Géraldine del Mondo & Julius Bañgate & Eric Sanlaville & Pierrick Tranouez, 2024. "Modelling the governance of European medium-sized port-cities [Modélisation de la gouvernance des villes portuaires européennes de taille moyenne]," Post-Print hal-04154472, HAL.
    13. Debrie, Jean & Lavaud-Letilleul, Valérie & Parola, Francesco, 2013. "Shaping port governance: the territorial trajectories of reform," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 56-65.
    14. Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Ducruet, César & Jacobs, Wouter & Monios, Jason & Notteboom, Theo & Rodrigue, Jean-Paul & Slack, Brian & Tam, Ka-chai & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2014. "Port geography at the crossroads with human geography: between flows and spaces," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 84-96.
    15. Hatani, Faith, 2016. "Institutional plasticity in public-private interactions: Why Japan’s port reform failed," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 923-936.
    16. Kang, Helen & Gray, Sidney J., 2019. "Country-specific risks and geographic disclosure aggregation: Voluntary disclosure behaviour by British multinationals," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 259-276.
    17. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason & Pérez-Salas, Gabriel, 2014. "Port system evolution – the case of Latin America and the Caribbean," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 208-221.
    18. Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda & Nicolás Contreras-Barraza & Lorena Araya-Silva, 2021. "Port Governance and Cruise Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Torben Andersen & Jonas Aryee & George Acheampong & Annette Skovsted Hansen, 2023. "The continuous search for new port governance models: experiences from a developing country," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Panayides, Photis M. & Parola, Francesco & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2015. "The effect of institutional factors on public–private partnership success in ports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 110-127.
    21. Hubert Paridaens & Theo Notteboom, 2021. "National Integrated Maritime Policies (IMP): Vision Formulation, Regional Embeddedness, and Institutional Attributes for Effective Policy Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:7:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-021-00103-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.