IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v15y2021i1p518-529n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academic leadership: agility in the digital revolution

Author

Listed:
  • Dima Alina Mihaela

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest Romania)

  • Point Sebastien

    (EM Strasbourg Business School, Université de Strasbourg, France)

  • Maassen Maria Alexandra

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest Romania)

  • Jansen Adela

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest Romania)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought tremendous challenges for the educational field, especially in terms of leadership strategies to be taken on a short notice in order to ensure both health security of the personnel and learners, but also adapt to an online teaching environment and other challenges. While several higher education institutions had partially or completely adapted to an online educational model, the COVID-19 period offered new challenges in terms of internationalization, investment in technology and financing, but also in terms of implementing new educational models, fully online or hybrid models. Based on a sample of 23 Universities from the European Union, the current research aimed to propose new directions of the academic leadership strategies and focus points during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as expected trends after the end of the pandemic. Based on the study of the academic leadership strategies and models in the European Union, this paper offers an additional practical overview to existing studies in the field, as it inquires the implemented university leadership strategies in order to adapt and overcome the current pandemic crisis, as well as ensuring the continuity of activities and development of higher educational institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dima Alina Mihaela & Point Sebastien & Maassen Maria Alexandra & Jansen Adela, 2021. "Academic leadership: agility in the digital revolution," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 518-529, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:518-529:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2021-0047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2021-0047
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2021-0047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Defazio, Daniela & Lockett, Andy & Wright, Mike, 2009. "Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 293-305, March.
    2. Bratianu Constantin & Prelipcean Gabriela & Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2020. "Exploring the latent variables which support SMEs to become learning organizations," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 154-171, June.
    3. Pucciarelli, Francesca & Kaplan, Andreas, 2016. "Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 311-320.
    4. Bălan Mădălina & Marin Silvia & Mitan Andreea & Pînzaru Florina & Vătămănescu Elena-Mădălina & Zbuchea Alexandra, 2019. "Leaders in focus: generational differences from a personality-centric perspective," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 372-385, December.
    5. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2016. "Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 441-450.
    6. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld, 2005. "Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 409-421, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Furtasan Ali Yusuf, 2020. "The Effect of Organizational Culture on Lecturers’ Organizational Commitment in Private Universities in Indonesia," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, April.
    2. ILSIAR Pogorelskaya & LÁSZLÓ Várallyai, 2020. "Trends In Education 4.0," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 367-375, July.
    3. Kaplan, Andreas, 2018. "A school is “a building that has four walls…with tomorrow inside”: Toward the reinvention of the business school," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 599-608.
    4. Csizmadia Tibor & Obermayer Nóra & Bogdány Eszter & Purnhauser Pál & Banász Zsuzsanna, 2023. "Examining Industry 4.0 through the lens of human resource and knowledge management: Implications for SMEs," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Jackson, Nicole C., 2019. "Managing for competency with innovation change in higher education: Examining the pitfalls and pivots of digital transformation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 761-772.
    6. Albert Rof & Andrea Bikfalvi & Pilar Marquès, 2020. "Digital Transformation for Business Model Innovation in Higher Education: Overcoming the Tensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Carlos Martin-Rios, 2016. "Innovative management control systems in knowledge work: a middle manager perspective," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 181-204, May.
    8. Elena Antonacopoulou, 2018. "Energising critique in action and in learning: The GNOSIS 4R Framework," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 102-125, May.
    9. Belén Álvarez-Bornstein & Adrián A. Díaz-Faes & María Bordons, 2019. "What characterises funded biomedical research? Evidence from a basic and a clinical domain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 805-825, May.
    10. Guiette, Alain & Vandenbempt, Koen, 2017. "Change managerialism and micro-processes of sensemaking during change implementation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 65-81.
    11. Martina Linnenluecke & Andrew Griffiths & Peter Mumby, 2015. "Executives’ engagement with climate science and perceived need for business adaptation to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 321-333, July.
    12. Jeffery S. McMullen & Dimo Dimov, 2013. "Time and the Entrepreneurial Journey: The Problems and Promise of Studying Entrepreneurship as a Process," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(8), pages 1481-1512, December.
    13. Emil Evenhuis, 2017. "Institutional change in cities and regions: a path dependency approach," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 509-526.
    14. Baicu Claudia Gabriela & Gârdan Iuliana Petronela & Gârdan Daniel Adrian & Epuran Gheorghe, 2020. "The impact of COVID-19 on consumer behavior in retail banking. Evidence from Romania," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(s1), pages 534-556, October.
    15. Laurent R. Bergé, 2017. "Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(4), pages 785-815, November.
    16. Stea, Diego & Foss, Nicolai J. & Christensen, Peter Holdt, 2015. "Physical separation in the workplace: Separation cues, separation awareness, and employee motivation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 462-471.
    17. Tiina J. Peltola & Hanna Tiirinki, 2020. "More Than Numbers: Discourses of Health Care Quality in Finland," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    18. Rydén, Pernille & Ringberg, Torsten & Wilke, Ricky, 2015. "How Managers' Shared Mental Models of Business–Customer Interactions Create Different Sensemaking of Social Media," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-16.
    19. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    20. Simen G. Enger & Fulvio Castellacci, 2016. "Who gets Horizon 2020 research grants? Propensity to apply and probability to succeed in a two-step analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1611-1638, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:518-529:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.