IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/manmar/v14y2019i4p372-385n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leaders in focus: generational differences from a personality-centric perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Bălan Mădălina

    (HART Consulting, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Marin Silvia

    (HART Consulting, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mitan Andreea

    (National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Pînzaru Florina

    (National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Vătămănescu Elena-Mădălina

    (National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Zbuchea Alexandra

    (National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The generational differences among leaders have progressively captured the attention of both researchers and practitioners interested in their dynamics within the work environment. Many analyses in this respect have been focused on the differences between Millennials (Generation Y) and Generation X members from a personality-centric perspective, the great majority of the examinations revolving around Western research samples. By acknowledging the current state and assuming the calls for further investigations advanced by various researchers, this conceptual and empirical undertaking aims to provide an exploratory outlook on generational differences among Romanian leaders, by employing worldwide reputed research instruments such as the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), Hogan Development Survey (HDS) and Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI). A sample of over 700 subjects was considered in the running of the statistical analyses, thus allowing to draw pertinent conclusions apposite to the envisaged population. Even though statistically significant findings were retrieved on few scales pertaining to the three applied instruments, one key insight advanced by the present endeavor resides in the extension of the scope of the existing literature dedicated to the generational differences from a leadership perspective via the integration of an Eastern European landscape which adds to the evidence in the field and opens up new research challenges for complementary scrutiny.

Suggested Citation

  • Bălan Mădălina & Marin Silvia & Mitan Andreea & Pînzaru Florina & Vătămănescu Elena-Mădălina & Zbuchea Alexandra, 2019. "Leaders in focus: generational differences from a personality-centric perspective," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 372-385, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:14:y:2019:i:4:p:372-385:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/mmcks-2019-0026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2019-0026
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/mmcks-2019-0026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pasi Pyöriä & Satu Ojala & Tiina Saari & Katri-Maria Järvinen, 2017. "The Millennial Generation," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harms, P.D. & White, Joshua V. & Fezzey, Tyler N.A., 2024. "Dark clouds on the horizon: Dark personality traits and the frontiers of the entrepreneurial economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Paul Stefan Markovits, 2023. "Digital Transformation of Agriculture in Romania: A Change Management Perspective," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 282-291, December.
    3. Csizmadia Tibor & Obermayer Nóra & Bogdány Eszter & Purnhauser Pál & Banász Zsuzsanna, 2023. "Examining Industry 4.0 through the lens of human resource and knowledge management: Implications for SMEs," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Dima Alina Mihaela & Point Sebastien & Maassen Maria Alexandra & Jansen Adela, 2021. "Academic leadership: agility in the digital revolution," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 518-529, December.
    5. Samoliuk Natalia & Bilan Yuriy & Mishchuk Halyna & Mishchuk Viktoriia, 2022. "Employer brand: key values influencing the intention to join a company," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 61-72, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmet Alkan Çelik & Mert Kılıç & Erkut Altındağ & Volkan Öngel & Ayşe Günsel, 2021. "Does the Reflection of Foci of Commitment in Job Performance Weaken as Generations Get Younger? A Comparison between Gen X and Gen Y Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. HÉDER-RIMA Mária, 2020. "How Can Work Be An Experience?," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 356-366, July.
    3. Syed Jamal Abdul Nasir & Nur Ain Syazmeen Ahmad Zaki, 2021. "Examining Proactive Career Management Behaviour, Readiness and Graduateness among First Degree Students in Selected Public Universities," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(4), pages 230-239, April.
    4. Craig Berry & Sean McDaniel, 2022. "Post-crisis precarity: Understanding attitudes to work and industrial relations among young people in the UK," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 322-343, February.
    5. Ángel Alloza-Losana & Enrique Carreras-Romero, 2021. "Invariance of the Reputation Emotional Index RepTrak Pulse: A Study Validation on Generational Change," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 143-157, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:14:y:2019:i:4:p:372-385:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.