IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v12y2018i1p966-974n86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business excellence models: a comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Toma Sorin-George

    (University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Marinescu Paul

    (University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

A new approach, called “business excellence”, has emerged in the business world and scientific literature in the past decades. Facing an increasingly turbulent and chaotic environment, more and more companies have implemented business excellence strategies and made quality a key element of their business philosophy. Modern measurement frameworks were created and developed by national or international bodies such as the excellence business models. These models provide guidelines and criteria for evaluation and are used by companies across the world as groundwork for continuous improvement. The paper aims to present and compare three well-known business excellence models in the world: Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, the Australian Business Excellence Framework and the European Foundation for Quality Management Excellence Model. In this respect, the authors have displayed the key elements of each business excellence model, followed by their comparison. In order to achieve the previous goals, the paper uses two methods: analysis and comparison. The information were obtained from multiple secondary sources of data- books and academic journal articles from the domains of total quality management and production economics found in libraries and electronic databases- through a desk research based on a significant literature review. The paper contributes to a better understanding of the business excellence models and may help managers to design and implement business excellence strategies. The paper shows that business excellence models provide a holistic approach to continuous improvement for any type of organization. These models are based on sound values, concepts and principles and have proved their viability during the time. Consequently, they gave birth to frameworks that allow organizations to benchmark their performances and demonstrate best practices in their field of activity. Also, the research findings indicate that the American model constituted a landmark for other business excellence models around the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Toma Sorin-George & Marinescu Paul, 2018. "Business excellence models: a comparison," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 966-974, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:966-974:n:86
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2018-0086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2018-0086
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2018-0086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritchie, L. & Dale, B. G., 2000. "Self-assessment using the business excellence model: A study of practice and process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 241-254, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rana Basu & Prabha Bhola, 2015. "Exploring Quality Management Practices and Its Pattern Analysis in Indian Service SMEs," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 199-235, June.
    2. Álvarez García, José & De la Cruz del Río Rama, María & Vila Alonso, Mercedes & Fraiz Brea, José Antonio, 2014. "Relação de dependência entre os fatores críticos de qualidade e impacto social," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 54(6), November.
    3. Tari­, Juan José, 2008. "Self-assessment exercises: A comparison between a private sector organisation and higher education institutions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 105-118, July.
    4. Özgür Özmen & Roxana Sârbu & Andreea Simona Sãseanu & Corneliu Toader, 2017. "The European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Excellence Model in a Low Voltage Switchgear Compan," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(S11), pages 1064-1064.
    5. Loutfi Boulahlib & Noor Hazilah Abd Manaf & Izhairi Bt Ismail & Rafikul Islam, 2022. "Exploring Factors Influencing Academic Staff Attitude towards the Implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM) in Higher Education," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(3), pages 98125-98125, December.
    6. Anita Trezona & Sarity Dodson & Emma Fitzsimon & Anthony D. LaMontagne & Richard H. Osborne, 2020. "Field-Testing and Refinement of the Organisational Health Literacy Responsiveness Self-Assessment (Org-HLR) Tool and Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Sheikh Imran Ishrat & Zahid Akhtar Khan & Arshad Noor Siddiquee & Irfan Anjum Badruddin & Ali Algahtani & Shakeel Javaid & Rajan Gupta, 2019. "Optimising Parameters for Expanded Polystyrene Based Pod Production Using Taguchi Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Saskia Maria De Gani & Daniela Nowak-Flück & Dunja Nicca & Dominique Vogt, 2020. "Self-Assessment Tool to Promote Organizational Health Literacy in Primary Care Settings in Switzerland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Yang, Yefei & Lee, Peter K.C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2016. "Continuous improvement competence, employee creativity, and new service development performance: A frontline employee perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 275-288.
    10. Miriam Jankalová & Radoslav Jankal, 2020. "How to Characterize Business Excellence and Determine the Relation between Business Excellence and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    11. Taylor, W.A. & Wright, G.H., 2006. "The contribution of measurement and information infrastructure to TQM success," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 372-384, August.
    12. Juan José Tarí & Carolina Madeleine, 2010. "Introducing management models in service organisations in developed and developing countries," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 789-806, October.
    13. Yang, Yefei & Lee, Peter K.C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2015. "Operational improvement competence and service recovery performance: The moderating effects of role stress and job resources," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 134-145.
    14. Calvo-Mora, Arturo & Roldán, José Luis, 2016. "The role of strategic planning in excellence management systemsAuthor-Name: Suarez, Eva," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 532-542.
    15. Tari, Juan Jose & Sabater, Vicente, 2004. "Quality tools and techniques: Are they necessary for quality management?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 267-280, December.
    16. Ala'Eddin Mohammad Khalaf Ahmad & Yasser Abdullah Rhbeini & Omar Zayyan Alsharqi & Najla Kadi, 2012. "Quality Assessment of a Dental Centre Using EFQM Excellence Model: A Case Study on King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(4), pages 121-140, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:966-974:n:86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.