IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v33y2017i2p477-511n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extending TSE to Administrative Data: A Quality Framework and Case Studies from Stats NZ

Author

Listed:
  • Reid Giles

    (Statistics New Zealand, 2018 Census, PO Box 2922, Wellington6140, New Zealand.)

  • Zabala Felipa

    (Statistics New Zealand, Statistical Methods, PO Box 2922, Wellington6140, New Zealand.)

  • Holmberg Anders

    (Statistics Norway, Division for Methodology, Akersveien 26 Oslo, Norway.)

Abstract

Many national statistics offices acknowledge that making better use of existing administrative data can reduce the cost of meeting ongoing statistical needs. Stats NZ has developed a framework to help facilitate this reuse. The framework is an adapted Total Survey Error (TSE) paradigm for understanding how the strengths and limitations of different data sets flow through a statistical design to affect final output quality. Our framework includes three phases: 1) a single source assessment, 2) an integrated data set assessment, and 3) an estimation and output assessment. We developed a process and guidelines for applying this conceptual framework to practical decisions about statistical design, and used these in recent redevelopment projects. We discuss how we used the framework with data sources that have a non-statistical primary purpose, and how it has helped us spread total survey error ideas to non-methodologists.

Suggested Citation

  • Reid Giles & Zabala Felipa & Holmberg Anders, 2017. "Extending TSE to Administrative Data: A Quality Framework and Case Studies from Stats NZ," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(2), pages 477-511, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:33:y:2017:i:2:p:477-511:n:9
    DOI: 10.1515/jos-2017-0023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0023
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jos-2017-0023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Roemer, 2002. "Using Administrative Earnings Records to Assess Wage Data Quality in the March Current Population Survey and the Survey of Income and Program Participation," Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Technical Papers 2002-22, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    2. Li‐Chun Zhang, 2012. "Topics of statistical theory for register‐based statistics and data integration," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 66(1), pages 41-63, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John L. Czajka & Mathew Stange, "undated". "Transparency in the Reporting of Quality for Integrated Data: A Review of International Standards and Guidelines," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 984e8919667b48ab9aabcbbcb, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fulvia Cerroni & Grazia Di Bella & Lorena Galiè, 2014. "Evaluating administrative data quality as inputof the statistical production process," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 16(1-2), pages 117-146.
    2. Fabrizio Antolini & Laura Grassini, 2020. "Methodological problems in the economic measurement of tourism: the need for new sources of information," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(5), pages 1769-1780, December.
    3. Fredrik Andersson & Elizabeth E. Davis & Matthew L. Freedman & Julia I. Lane & Brian P. Mccall & Kristin Sandusky, 2012. "Decomposing the Sources of Earnings Inequality: Assessing the Role of Reallocation," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 779-810, October.
    4. Stüber, Heiko & Grabka, Markus M. & Schnitzlein, Daniel D., 2023. "A tale of two data sets: comparing German administrative and survey data using wage inequality as an example," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 57, pages 1-8.
    5. Ton de Waal & Arnout van Delden & Sander Scholtus, 2020. "Multi‐source Statistics: Basic Situations and Methods," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 203-228, April.
    6. van Delden Arnout & Lorenc Boris & Struijs Peter & Zhang Li-Chun, 2018. "Letter to the Editor," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 34(2), pages 573-580, June.
    7. Beręsewicz Maciej, 2019. "Correlates of Representation Errors in Internet Data Sources for Real Estate Market," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 35(3), pages 509-529, September.
    8. Emily Isenberg & Liana Christin Landivar & Esther Mezey, 2013. "A Comparison Of Person-Reported Industry To Employer-Reported Industry In Survey And Administrative Data," Working Papers 13-47, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    9. Katharine G. Abraham & John Haltiwanger & Kristin Sandusky & James R. Spletzer, 2013. "Exploring Differences in Employment between Household and Establishment Data," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(S1), pages 129-172.
    10. Jonathan Heathcote & Fabrizio Perri & Giovanni L. Violante, 2010. "Unequal We Stand: An Empirical Analysis of Economic Inequality in the United States: 1967-2006," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 13(1), pages 15-51, January.
    11. John L. Czajka & Mathew Stange, "undated". "Transparency in the Reporting of Quality for Integrated Data: A Review of International Standards and Guidelines," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 984e8919667b48ab9aabcbbcb, Mathematica Policy Research.
    12. John L. Czajka & James Mabli & Scott Cody, "undated". "Sample Loss and Survey Bias in Estimates of Social Security Beneficiaries: A Tale of Two Surveys," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 764acc7a0a0b462c9906514d5, Mathematica Policy Research.
    13. Gołata Elżbieta, 2016. "Shift in Methodology and Population Census Quality," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 17(4), pages 631-658, December.
    14. Di Cecco Davide & Di Zio Marco & Filipponi Danila & Rocchetti Irene, 2018. "Population Size Estimation Using Multiple Incomplete Lists with Overcoverage," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 34(2), pages 557-572, June.
    15. Maciej Beręsewicz, 2017. "A Two-Step Procedure to Measure Representativeness of Internet Data Sources," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(3), pages 473-493, December.
    16. James P. Ziliak & Charles Hokayem & Christopher R. Bollinger, 2022. "Trends in Earnings Volatility Using Linked Administrative and Survey Data," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 12-19, December.
    17. Jae‐Kwang Kim & Siu‐Ming Tam, 2021. "Data Integration by Combining Big Data and Survey Sample Data for Finite Population Inference," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(2), pages 382-401, August.
    18. Boeschoten Laura & Oberski Daniel & de Waal Ton, 2017. "Estimating Classification Errors Under Edit Restrictions in Composite Survey-Register Data Using Multiple Imputation Latent Class Modelling (MILC)," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(4), pages 921-962, December.
    19. Andreasch Michael & Lindner Peter, 2016. "Micro- and Macrodata: a Comparison of the Household Finance and Consumption Survey with Financial Accounts in Austria," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(1), pages 1-28, March.
    20. Richard Bavier, 2008. "Reconciliation of income and consumption data in poverty measurement," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 40-62.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:33:y:2017:i:2:p:477-511:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.