IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/njopap/v10y2017i2p49-72n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Performance of Government Inspection Bodies: A Possible Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Dobrolyubova Elena

Abstract

Ensuring the public safety and limiting administrative barriers have been the two core objectives of most reforms in the area of business inspections and regulatory enforcement for the past decade. However, measuring these efforts has proved quite challenging both in OECD countries and in Russia. Lack of attention to the results achieved or misinterpretation of progress may affect the success of the reform efforts. Th e objective of this paper is to develop a framework for defining and evaluating both the effectiveness and the efficiency of regulatory enforcement and to apply this framework to several areas of inspection activities (such as occupational and food safety) in Russia. Th e proposed framework advances the existing international approaches to measuring the performance of government inspection bodies and accounts for perspectives of citizens, businesses and governments as crucial stakeholders of inspection reforms. Th e paper is based on both qualitative and quantitative methods (sociological surveys and statistical research). Th e results suggest that evaluating the performance of business inspections should include all aspects of minimizing risks and losses in the controlled area - from prevention of violations (reducing risks) to ensuring the reimbursement, should the risk event happen. Various levels of results, including final outcomes (impact), intermediate outcomes and outputs, are needed as they allow for detecting important inconsistencies and gaps in the performance of government inspection bodies. Th e use of various sources of performance data, independent from inspection bodies, is critical for the successful implementation of the proposed framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Dobrolyubova Elena, 2017. "Evaluating Performance of Government Inspection Bodies: A Possible Approach," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 49-72, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:49-72:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/nispa-2017-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2017-0011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/nispa-2017-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. Dobrolyubova, 2016. "International Experience in Evaluating Effectiveness of Public Control in Occupational Safety," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 96-110.
    2. Christiane Arndt & Sarah Hermanutz & Céline Kauffmann & Rebecca Schultz, 2016. "Building Regulatory Policy Systems in OECD Countries," OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers 5, OECD Publishing.
    3. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2015. "Performance and Accountability—A Theoretical Discussion and an Empirical Assessment," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 207-225, June.
    4. Svetlana Doroshenko, 2012. "Assessment of environment protection activity impacct in russian regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 116-128.
    5. Sorin Dan & Christopher Pollitt, 2015. "NPM Can Work: An optimistic review of the impact of New Public Management reforms in central and eastern Europe," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1305-1332, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pisár Peter & Varga Martin, 2018. "Public Support for Higher Education Institutions from EU Structural Funds and its Evaluation: Case Study of Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 103-127, December.
    2. Suleimenova Gulimzhan & Kapoguzov Evgeny & Kabizhan Nurbek & Kadyrova Margarita, 2018. "Performance Evaluation of the Government Agencies of Kazakhstan," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 171-198, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jia Song & Zunwei Yang, 2023. "Striving Transition for University Academics: The Academic Role Identity of Young Postdocs at Universities in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    2. Maslennikova, Elena V. (Масленникова, Елена) & Dobrolyubova, Elena I. (Добролюбова, Елена) & Yuzhakov, Vladimir N. (Южаков, Владимир), 2020. "Effectiveness of Control and Enforcement Activities in Selected Areas: Statistics and Sociology [Статистика И Социология Результатов Контрольно-Надзорной Деятельности]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 90-107, February.
    3. Mononen, Petri & Leviäkangas, Pekka & Haapasalo, Harri, 2017. "From internal efficiency to societal benefits – Multi modal transport safety agency's socio-economic impact analysis," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 78-90.
    4. Teresa Godinho & Isabel Pinto Reis & Rui Carvalho & Filipa Martinho, 2023. "Onboarding Handbook: An Indispensable Tool for Onboarding Processes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Colebatch H.K., 2017. "Policy, learning and regime change: Western concepts and CEE experience," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 2-10, December.
    6. Hennau Sofie, 2020. "The Relationship between Politics and Administration at the Flemish Local Level: Intermunicipal Differences Explained," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 141-160, December.
    7. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2021. "Accountable Government through Collaborative Governance?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Vakulenko Veronika & Mattei Giorgia, 2023. "Reforming the Public Sector in Eastern European and Former Soviet Union Countries: A Systematic Literature Review," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 55-79, June.
    9. Mauro, Sara Giovanna & Cinquini, Lino & Pianezzi, Daniela, 2021. "New Public Management between reality and illusion: Analysing the validity of performance-based budgeting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
    10. Lhawang Ugyel, 2021. "Relationship between public sector reforms and culture: The implementation of NPM‐related performance management reforms in a collectivist and risk averse culture," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(5), pages 257-266, December.
    11. Di Virgilio, Francesca & Capalbo, Francesco & Doronzo, Emanuele, 2024. "A bibliometric analysis of digitalization in public sector and human resources management studies. What happened to the trial court organization?," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp24097, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    12. Yuliya Krasheninnikova, 2018. "External Control over Temporary Disability Examination in the Russian Federation," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 153-176.
    13. Ochrana František & Plaček Michal & Křápek Milan, 2017. "Who are the officials in the central administration of the Czech Republic and what activities do they perform?," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 55-66, June.
    14. Yuzhakov, Valdimir N. (Южаков, Владимир) & Dobrolyubova, Elena I. (Добролюбова, Елена) & Pokida, Andrei N. (Покида, Андрей) & Zybunovskaya, Natalia V. (Зыбуновская, Наталья), 2019. "Effectiveness of Public Inspection and Enforcement Activity for Final Beneficiaries [Результативность Контрольно-Надзорной Деятельности Государства С Позиции Граждан]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 92-115, February.
    15. Maria Teresa Nardo & Georgiana Cristina Codreanu & Fabiana Roberto, 2021. "Universities’ Social Responsibility through the Lens of Strategic Planning: A Content Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Tomasz Michalski & Krzysztof Kopeć, 2021. "Implementation Of Monitoring Of The Quality Of Public Services At The Local Level As A Tool For Reforming Public Administration - The Polish Experience," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 6, pages 128-145.
    17. Dobra Bardhyl & de Vries Michiel S, 2016. "Privatization in an Adverse Institutional Context: The Case of Kosovo," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 9-30, June.
    18. Antoine Genest-Grégoire & Étienne Charbonneau & Daniel E. Bromberg, 2018. "The Sustainability Assumption in Performance Management Reforms: Revisiting the Patterns of Implementation," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 525-542, December.
    19. Silvia Fresneda & Nuria Reguera & Fernando Casas, 2021. "De-agentification Process in Spanish Regional Governments," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 236(1), pages 39-64, March.
    20. Iizuka, Michiko & Vargas, Fernando & Baumann, Jakob, 2017. "Financial mechanism to invest in knowledge from natural resource revenues: Experiences from Bolivia, Chile, Colombia and Peru," MERIT Working Papers 2017-042, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:49-72:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.