IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/joinma/v15y2023i3p50-77n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Startups: the Global Context of Functioning and the Need for Innovation Openness

Author

Listed:
  • Kusio Tomasz

    (Cracow University of Economics, Cracow, Poland)

  • Miśkiewicz Radosław

    (University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland)

  • Borowiecki Ryszard

    (WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland)

  • Fijałkowska Justyna

    (University of Social Sciences, Poland, University of Lodz, Poland)

  • Rzepka Agnieszka

    (Lublin University of Technology, Poland)

  • Gross-Gołacka Elwira

    (University of Warsaw, Poland)

  • Ristvej Jozef

    (University of Zilina, Zilina, Slovakia)

Abstract

Objective The presented work is part of the discussions on evaluating the organizational surroundings, which, in the context of an increasingly globalizing world, is becoming regarded from a global perspective. Considerations of the environmental perception are supported with reflections on innovation and, in particular, startups’ innovation. Businesses, which are characterized by the ambition of dynamic scalability, are able to accomplish this dynamism precisely through innovative intensity, which in turn can also be associated with openness to knowledge and solutions coming from the surroundings, not only the closest – local or regional but also international or even global. Striving to develop toward smart enterprises, startups should concentrate on the digitalization of their processes, entering the path of Industry 4.0. The purpose of the work is to contribute to the perception of the environment by startups and the perception of open innovation. Methodology In order to meet the objectives of the work, in addition to considerations based on the existing results available in the literature, the results of an analysis of data from a questionnaire survey conducted among future startups were also used. To achieve the objectives of the study, research questions were formulated referring to the general view of future innovation openness, then the view of the propensity to share knowledge, that is, openness from the enterprise side, and finally also the view of the need for openness of the organization at different stages of its development. In the context of organizational openness, the broadest geographically possible context of the organization’s environment, namely the global context, was also considered. Findings As a result of the analysis, a relationship emerged between perceptions of innovative openness and the global environment of companies. The greater geographical scope of operations is accompanied by a higher demand for innovation, the more globally the enterprises would like to operate, the more innovation intensive they should be. Future entrepreneurs are strong advocates of open innovation, and they are also strong advocates of viewing the environment in an increasingly global dimension.

Suggested Citation

  • Kusio Tomasz & Miśkiewicz Radosław & Borowiecki Ryszard & Fijałkowska Justyna & Rzepka Agnieszka & Gross-Gołacka Elwira & Ristvej Jozef, 2023. "Startups: the Global Context of Functioning and the Need for Innovation Openness," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(3), pages 50-77, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:50-77:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/joim-2023-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2023-0011
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/joim-2023-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dariusz Klimek, 2020. "Sustainable Enterprise Capital Management," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, February.
    2. Elżbieta Jędrych & Dariusz Klimek & Agnieszka Rzepka, 2021. "Principles of Sustainable Management of Energy Companies: The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Richard A. Bettis & Michael A. Hitt, 1995. "The new competitive landscape," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(S1), pages 7-19.
    4. Elwira Gross-Golacka & Marta Kusterka-Jefmanska & Radoslaw Miskiewicz & Bartlomiej Jefmanski & Agnieszka Rzepka & Teresa Kupczyk, 2021. "The Intellectual Capital and its Impact on the Sustainable Development of the SML-Sized Enterprises in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 410-429.
    5. Agnieszka Rzepka & Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Anna Maria Wisniewska & Maria Kocot, 2021. "E-Consumers and their Agile Qualities as Creators of Eco-Innovations: A Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 23-38.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Laskowska & Jan Franciszek Laskowski, 2022. "“Silver” Generation at Work—Implications for Sustainable Human Capital Management in the Industry 5.0 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Faouzi Bensebaa, 2003. "La dynamique concurrentielle:défis analytiques et méthodologiques," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 6(1), pages 5-37, March.
    3. Yu-Shan Chen & Ke-Chiun Chang, 2009. "Using neural network to analyze the influence of the patent performance upon the market value of the US pharmaceutical companies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(3), pages 637-655, September.
    4. David G. Sirmon & Michael A. Hitt, 2003. "Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 27(4), pages 339-358, October.
    5. Unai Apaolaza & Aitor Orue & Aitor Lizarralde & Aitor Oyarbide-Zubillaga, 2022. "Competitive Improvement through Integrated Management of Sales and Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Vishal K. Gupta & Suman Niranjan & Banu A. Goktan & John Eriskon, 2016. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation role in shaping reactions to new technologies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 935-961, December.
    7. Ilona Baumane & Rebekka Vedina, 2011. "Capacities and Competencies as Sources of Competitive Advantage: The Case Study of Latvian Hotels," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(2), pages 301-318, May.
    8. Stine Labes & Nicolai Hanner & Ruediger Zarnekow, 2017. "Successful Business Model Types of Cloud Providers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(4), pages 223-233, August.
    9. Palash Deb & Parthiban David & Jonathan O'Brien, 2017. "When is cash good or bad for firm performance?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 436-454, February.
    10. Pullig, Chris & Maxham, James III & Hair, Joseph Jr., 2002. "Salesforce automation systems: an exploratory examination of organizational factors associated with effective implementation and salesforce productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 401-415, May.
    11. David G. Sirmon & Jean–Luc Arregle & Michael A. Hitt & Justin W. Webb, 2008. "The Role of Family Influence in Firms’ Strategic Responses to Threat of Imitation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(6), pages 979-998, November.
    12. Da Mota de Pina E Cunha, A.M., 1998. "Determinants of Product Innovation in Organizations : Practices and Performance in the Portugese Financial Sector," Other publications TiSEM e6e4e56e-b72a-4392-8d79-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Gerard Seijts & Alyson Byrne & Mary M. Crossan & Jeffrey Gandz, 2019. "Leader character in board governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(1), pages 227-258, March.
    14. Elżbieta Jędrych & Dariusz Klimek & Agnieszka Rzepka, 2021. "Principles of Sustainable Management of Energy Companies: The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Gupta, Vipin & MacMillan, Ian C. & Surie, Gita, 2004. "Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 241-260, March.
    16. Artur Kwasek & Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Damian Kocot & Marek Martin & Maria Kocot, 2021. "A Study on the Determinants of Consumer Online Purchasing Behaviour," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 658-671.
    17. Piyali Ghosh & Geetika, 2007. "Recruitment Strategies," Asian Journal of Management Cases, , vol. 4(1), pages 5-25, January.
    18. Shaker A. Zahra & Anders P. Nielsen & William C. Bogner, 1999. "Corporate Entrepreneurship, Knowledge, and Competence Development," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(3), pages 169-189, April.
    19. Omar Vila & Sundar Bharadwaj & S. Bahadir, 2015. "Exploration- and Exploitation-Oriented Marketing Strategies and Sales Growth in Emerging Markets," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(4), pages 277-289, December.
    20. Miguel Pina e Cunha & Joao Vieira da Cunha & Ken Kamoche, 2000. "The age of emergence: toward a new organizational mindset," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp382, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:50-77:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.