IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/jecman/v43y2021i1p110-130n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competence measurement of production enterprises in product innovations for technological and marketing strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Rutkowski Ireneusz P.

    (Department of Market Research and Services Management, Institute of Marketing, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

Aim/purpose – This paper attempts to arrange and present the methods of measuring the competences of production enterprises in the field of product innovations. Design/methodology/approach – The method used in this paper is a literature review, in the area of new product development management. The author assumes that the review and conceptual nature of this research is dominant. Findings – The obtained results indicate the importance of measurement in product innovation competencies and provide various metrics in this field. The author proposes new indicators to measure competencies in this area, i.e., the intensity of competition on new products market. Research implications/limitations – The results provide a basis for improving efforts of production enterprises in the field of product innovations. The limitations of the study include a complex character of considered theoretical constructs. Sets of measures must be adapted to the information needs of a specific enterprise. Originality/value/contribution – The values of these indicators reflect the directions of industrial enterprises’ conduct in the process of developing new products and technologies. Moreover, these indicators show the strength of linking technology with the effectiveness of new product development, and consequently with the enterprise marketing, economic and financial efficiency. The contribution of research to the development of management sciences primarily includes the formulation of a set of indicators whose level determines product innovation competencies in industrial companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Rutkowski Ireneusz P., 2021. "Competence measurement of production enterprises in product innovations for technological and marketing strategies," Journal of Economics and Management, Sciendo, vol. 43(1), pages 110-130, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:jecman:v:43:y:2021:i:1:p:110-130:n:5
    DOI: 10.22367/jem.2021.43.06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2021.43.06
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22367/jem.2021.43.06?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritter, Thomas & Gemunden, Hans Georg, 2004. "The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 548-556, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Dinu & Elena-Mădălina Vătămănescu & Roxana-Maria Stăneiu & Mihaela Rusu, 2023. "An Exploratory Study Linking Intellectual Capital and Technology Management towards Innovative Performance in KIBS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Yaffa Moskovich, 2018. "Belief systems and business strategy in a privatized kibbutz factory," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 5-36, March.
    3. Jinkyo Shin & Md Alamgir Mollah & Jaehyeok Choi, 2023. "Sustainability and Organizational Performance in South Korea: The Effect of Digital Leadership on Digital Culture and Employees’ Digital Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Yaffa Moskovich, 2020. "Business Sustainability Strategy in a Cooperative Kibbutz Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Christian Rammer & Dirk Czarnitzki & Alfred Spielkamp, 2009. "Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: substituting technology by management in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 35-58, June.
    6. Wei Zheng & Haiyin Tu & Yuandong Gu & Haoqi Sun, 2024. "The “human side” of coopetition: the role of CEO mindsets in firm coopetition for innovation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1451-1479, September.
    7. Eriksson, Tor & Qin, Zhihua & Wang, Wenjing, 2014. "Firm-level innovation activity, employee turnover and HRM practices — Evidence from Chinese firms," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 583-597.
    8. Hongxiong Yang & Wanru Ren, 2021. "Research on the Influence Mechanism and Configuration Path of Network Relationship Characteristics on SMEs’ Innovation—The Mediating Effect of Supply Chain Dynamic Capability and the Moderating Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Noor Hazlina Ahmad & Hasliza Abdul Halim, 2013. "Beyond? Know-Who?: The Instrumental Role of Relationship Competency among SME Entrepreneurs," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(4), pages 69-80, April.
    10. Xie, Xuemei & Wu, Yonghui & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Ribeiro-Navarrete, Samuel, 2022. "Business networks and organizational resilience capacity in the digital age during COVID-19: A perspective utilizing organizational information processing theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    11. Manis, K.T. & Madhavaram, Sreedhar, 2023. "AI-Enabled marketing capabilities and the hierarchy of capabilities: Conceptualization, proposition development, and research avenues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Wei Jiang & Felix Mavondo & Weihong Zhao, 2020. "The impact of business networks on dynamic capabilities and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic orientation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1239-1266, December.
    13. Van Lancker, Jonas & Mondelaers, Koen & Wauters, Erwin & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2016. "The Organizational Innovation System: A systemic framework for radical innovation at the organizational level," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 52, pages 40-50.
    14. Mahadi Bahari & Ibrahim Arpaci & Oguzhan Der & Fatih Akkoyun & Ali Ercetin, 2024. "Driving Agricultural Transformation: Unraveling Key Factors Shaping IoT Adoption in Smart Farming with Empirical Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-22, March.
    15. Sefiani, Yassine & Davies, Barry & Bown, Robin & Kite, Neilson, 2016. "The interface of networking and 'wasta' in an Arabic context," MPRA Paper 71889, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Virginie Gallego-Roquelaure, 2020. "The emergence process of an international network of SMEs and the evolution of the leader’s role," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 44-62, March.
    17. Shalom Levy & Itzhak Tabatchnik & Sagi Akron, 2019. "Product success implications of distant innovative knowledge," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(1), pages 69-88, March.
    18. Yongfu Li & Yu Song & Jinxin Wang & Chengwei Li, 2019. "Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Chinese Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Annachiara Casalini & Guido Fioretti & Andreas Pyka, 2016. "Playfulness, ideology and the technology of foolishness in the creation of a novel market niche for distributed control: The case of iPLON," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Adam J. Bock & Andreas B. Eisengerich & Dmitry Sharapov & Gerard George, 2015. "Innovation and Leadership," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    competence measurement; product innovation; production enterprise; new product; technical and marketing strategy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:jecman:v:43:y:2021:i:1:p:110-130:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.