IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecoman/v16y2024i2p148-165n1010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process security methods and measurement in the context of standard management systems

Author

Listed:
  • Kemendi Agnes

    (Óbuda University, Doctoral School on Safety and Security Sciences, Népszínház Street 8 H-1081 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Michelberger Pal

    (Óbuda University, Faculty of Mechanical and Safety Engineering Becsi Street 96/B H-1034 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

The main purpose of the paper is to identify ways to establish process security in the constantly changing risk and control environment and to introduce a new model. The research is based on a literature review of process security components. Qualitative content analysis was used to establish a linkage between the certified management systems and the level of process security. Elaborations have been conducted based on the survey data of the International Standards Organisation (ISO) and served as a basis for analysis of certification types and their sectoral division in the European Union (EU) member states. A new Balanced Scorecard has been developed to cover the security pillars in the context of standard management systems and serve as a framework for process security measurement. The research paper processes the state-of-the-art issue of process security, introduces components that help to establish process security, and establishes a linkage between the level of process security and certified management systems. An analysis was based on the ISO certification information related to different management system standards. Management systems were analysed in the context of process security and corresponding process performance measures. A brief walkthrough has been prepared to demonstrate the processes behind the underlying performance measures. A new Balanced Scorecard approach has been developed that maps and covers different security aspects retrieved from and linked to different management system standards. The new Balanced Scorecard based on different security aspects of entities can be leveraged by any organisation, regardless of its size or business profile.

Suggested Citation

  • Kemendi Agnes & Michelberger Pal, 2024. "Process security methods and measurement in the context of standard management systems," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 148-165.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:148-165:n:1010
    DOI: 10.2478/emj-2024-0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2024-0019
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/emj-2024-0019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linda J. Tallau & Manish Gupta & Raj Sharman, 2010. "Information security investment decisions: evaluating the Balanced Scorecard method," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 34-57.
    2. Pál Michelberger, 2014. "Risk Management for Business Trust," Proceedings- 11th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2014),, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    3. Hammer, Michael & Champy, James, 1993. "Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 90-91.
    4. Tawse, Alex & Tabesh, Pooya, 2023. "Thirty years with the balanced scorecard: What we have learned," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 123-132.
    5. Tejaswini C. Herath & Hemantha S. B. Herath & David Cullum, 2023. "An Information Security Performance Measurement Tool for Senior Managers: Balanced Scorecard Integration for Security Governance and Control Frameworks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 681-721, April.
    6. Fotis Kitsios & Elpiniki Chatzidimitriou & Maria Kamariotou, 2023. "The ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management Standard: How to Extract Value from Data in the IT Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toppen, R. & Smits, M.T. & Ribbers, P.M.A., 1998. "Improving process performance through market network design : A study of the impact of electronic markets in the financial securities sector," Other publications TiSEM c3c8d2ea-7727-475e-83cf-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. V.K. Gupta, 2016. "Strategic framework for managing forces of continuity and change in innovation and risk management in service sector: a study of service industry in India," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(1), pages 1-17.
    3. Harry Hummels & Patrick Nullens, 2022. "‘Other-wise’ Organizing. A Levinasian Approach to Agape in Work and Business Organisations," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 211-232, October.
    4. Tina George Karippacheril & Soonhee Kim & Robert P. Jr. Beschel & Changyong Choi, 2016. "Bringing Government into the 21st Century," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 24579.
    5. Stephan Kudyba, 2006. "Enhancing Organisational Information Flow And Knowledge Creation In Re-Engineering Supply Chain Systems: An Analysis Of The U.S. Automotive Parts And Supplies Model," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(02), pages 163-173.
    6. Nurmi, Raimo, 1998. "Knowledge-intensive firms," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 26-32.
    7. Daniele Binci, 2013. "L?equilibrio organizzativo attraverso il clima. L?evidenza empirica di un ente locale," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 65-97.
    8. Vansina, L.S. & Taillieu, T.C.B., 1994. "Business process reengineering or socio-technical system design in new clothes?," WORC Paper 94.09.064/3, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    9. Awolusi & Olawumi Dele & Akeke & Niyi Isreal & Akinruwa & Temitope Emmanuel, 2014. "Modeling Business Process Re-Engineering and Organizational Performance in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 3(5), pages 336-350.
    10. Fındık, Derya & Beyhan, Berna, 2014. "A Perceptual Measure of Innovation Performance: Micro Level Evidence from Turkey," MPRA Paper 60961, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Jacques Simonin & Selmin Nurcan & Judith Barrios, 2013. "Evolution organisationnelle fondée sur la cohérence des relations entre acteurs avec les buts métiers," Post-Print hal-00831621, HAL.
    12. Charalambos Vlados & Fotios Katimertzopoulos, 2019. "The ¡°Mystery¡± of Innovation: Bridging the Economic and Business Thinking and the Stra.Tech.Man Approach," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 236-262, March.
    13. Lixiang Jiang & Ronald Giachetti, 2008. "A queueing network model to analyze the impact of parallelization of care on patient cycle time," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 248-261, September.
    14. Agnieszka Bielinska-Kwapisz, 2014. "Do football teams learn from changing coaches? A test of the deceleration hypothesis," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-9, December.
    15. Thomas Grisold & Christian Janiesch & Maximilian Röglinger & Moe Thandar Wynn, 2024. "Managing Dynamics in and Around Business Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 533-540, October.
    16. Lehrer, Mark & Banerjee, Preeta M. & Wang, I. Kim, 2017. "When the sky is the limit on scale: From temporal to multiplicative scaling in process-based technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 151-159.
    17. Patrick Afflerbach & Martin Hohendorf & Jonas Manderscheid, 0. "Design it like Darwin - A value-based application of evolutionary algorithms for proper and unambiguous business process redesign," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    18. Roan, Jinshyang & Gong, Linguo & Tang, Kwei, 1997. "Process mean determination under constant raw material supply," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 353-365, June.
    19. Lida Xu & WenAn Tan & Hongyuan Zhen & Weiming Shen, 2008. "An approach to enterprise process dynamic modeling supporting enterprise process evolution," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(5), pages 611-624, November.
    20. Harish Kumar & S.V.S. Chauhan, 1998. "Re-engineering Public Sector Enterprises," Vision, , vol. 2(2), pages 44-50, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:148-165:n:1010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.