IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecoman/v14y2022i2p1-12n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Costa Diogo António da Silva

    (Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Mamede Henrique São

    (INESC TEC, Universidade Aberta, Portugal)

  • Mira da Silva Miguel

    (Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Robotic process automation (RPA) is a recent technology that has recently become increasingly adopted by companies as a solution for employees to focus on higher complexity and more valuable tasks while delegating routine, monotonous and rule-based tasks to their digital colleagues. The increased interest, reflected in the increasing number of articles regarding approaches and test cases, has triggered the necessity for a summary that could extract the more generalisable ideas and concepts about these software robots. This paper used a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach to find and synthesise information from articles obtained on this subject. This research identified the most general implementation approaches of successful RPA adoption cases, observed benefits, challenges commonly faced by organisations, characteristics that make processes more suitable for RPA, and research gaps in the current literature. The findings presented in this paper have two purposes. The first is to provide a way for companies and organisations to become more familiar with good practices regarding the adoption of robotic process automation. The second is to foster further research on the subject by complementing the current knowledge and proposing new paths for research.

Suggested Citation

  • Costa Diogo António da Silva & Mamede Henrique São & Mira da Silva Miguel, 2022. "Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:1-12:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/emj-2022-0012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2022-0012
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/emj-2022-0012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurence Viale & Dorsaf Zouari, 2020. "Impact of digitalization on procurement: the case of robotic process automation," Post-Print hal-03695535, HAL.
    2. Huang, Feiqi & Vasarhelyi, Miklos A., 2019. "Applying robotic process automation (RPA) in auditing: A framework," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    3. Daehyoun Choi & Hind R’bigui & Chiwoon Cho, 2021. "Candidate Digital Tasks Selection Methodology for Automation with Robotic Process Automation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Willcocks, Leslie P. & Lacity, Mary & Craig, Andrew, 2015. "Robotic process automation at Xchanging," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64518, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Hartley, Janet L. & Sawaya, William J., 2019. "Tortoise, not the hare: Digital transformation of supply chain business processes," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 707-715.
    6. Lacity, Mary & Willcocks, Leslie P. & Craig, Andrew, 2015. "Robotic process automation at Telefónica O2," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64516, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Julia Siderska, 2021. "The Adoption of Robotic Process Automation Technology to Ensure Business Processes during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Plattfaut, Ralf & Koch, Julian, 2021. "Preserving the legacy – Why do professional soccer clubs (not) adopt innovative process technologies? A grounded theory study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 237-250.
    9. Willcocks, Leslie & Lacity, Mary & Craig, Andrew, 2017. "Robotic process automation: strategic transformation lever for global business services?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 71146, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Andrzej Sobczak & Leszek Ziora, 2021. "The Use of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) as an Element of Smart City Implementation: A Case Study of Electricity Billing Document Management at Bydgoszcz City Hall," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Kokina, Julia & Blanchette, Shay, 2019. "Early evidence of digital labor in accounting: Innovation with Robotic Process Automation," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura García-Fernández & Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado & María-José García-López, 2024. "Mapping the main research themes in digital human resources," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Cascavilla, Alessandro, 2024. "Between money and speculative asset: The role of financial literacy on the perception towards Bitcoin in Italy," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bavaresco, Rodrigo Simon & Nesi, Luan Carlos & Victória Barbosa, Jorge Luis & Antunes, Rodolfo Stoffel & da Rosa Righi, Rodrigo & da Costa, Cristiano André & Vanzin, Mariangela & Dornelles, Daniel & J, 2023. "Machine learning-based automation of accounting services: An exploratory case study," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Shubhangini Rajput, 2024. "Analysis of Industry 4.0 technological enablers for sustainable supply chain transparency in a fuzzy environment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8616-8636, December.
    3. Emilio Abad-Segura & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar, 2020. "Research Analysis on Emerging Technologies in Corporate Accounting," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-29, September.
    4. Perdana, Arif & Lee, W. Eric & Mui Kim, Chu, 2023. "Prototyping and implementing Robotic Process Automation in accounting firms: Benefits, challenges and opportunities to audit automation," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Julia Siderska, 2021. "The Adoption of Robotic Process Automation Technology to Ensure Business Processes during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Alexandru-Mihai Crijman, 2021. "Good Business Processes Candidates For Automation Future Of Work: Robotic Process Automation," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 63-71, August.
    7. Mahmoud Abdulhadi Alabdali & Mohammad Asif Salam, 2022. "The Impact of Digital Transformation on Supply Chain Procurement for Creating Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Marc Eulerich & Aida Sanatizadeh & Hamid Vakilzadeh & David A. Wood, 2024. "Is it all hype? ChatGPT’s performance and disruptive potential in the accounting and auditing industries," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 2318-2349, September.
    9. Huang, Feiqi & Vasarhelyi, Miklos A., 2019. "Applying robotic process automation (RPA) in auditing: A framework," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    10. Syaiful Anwar Mohamed & Moamin A. Mahmoud & Mohammed Najah Mahdi & Salama A. Mostafa, 2022. "Improving Efficiency and Effectiveness of Robotic Process Automation in Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Roman Šperka & Michal Halaška, 2023. "The performance assessment framework (PPAFR) for RPA implementation in a loan application process using process mining," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 277-321, June.
    12. Uklańska Anna, 2023. "Robotic Process Automation (RPA) – Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 129-140, January.
    13. Yasheng Chen & Zhuojun Wu & Hui Yan, 2022. "A Full Population Auditing Method Based on Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Krakau, Jan & Feldmann, Carsten & Kaupe, Victor, 2021. "Robotic process automation in logistics: Implementation model and factors of success," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Adapting to the Future: Maritime and City Logistics in the Context of Digitalization and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conf, volume 32, pages 219-256, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    15. Suo, Xuekun & Zhang, Longting & Guo, Rong & Lin, Han & Yu, Mingchuan & Du, Xiuhong, 2024. "The inverted U-shaped association between digital economy and corporate total factor productivity: A knowledge-based perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    16. Shuhao Liang & Tingting Li, 2022. "Can Digital Transformation Promote Innovation Performance in Manufacturing Enterprises? The Mediating Role of R&D Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Wei, Shuang & Liu, Weihua & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Dong, Jing-xin & Long, Shangsong, 2024. "The influence of key components and digital technologies on manufacturer's choice of innovation strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1210-1220.
    18. Aristotelis Mavidis & Dimitris Folinas, 2022. "From Public E-Procurement 3.0 to E-Procurement 4.0; A Critical Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    19. Sarker, Indranil & Datta, Bidisha, 2022. "Re-designing the pension business processes for achieving technology-driven reforms through blockchain adoption: A proposed architecture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Beaulieu, Martin & Bentahar, Omar, 2021. "Digitalization of the healthcare supply chain: A roadmap to generate benefits and effectively support healthcare delivery," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:1-12:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.