IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i16p5191-d619448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) as an Element of Smart City Implementation: A Case Study of Electricity Billing Document Management at Bydgoszcz City Hall

Author

Listed:
  • Andrzej Sobczak

    (Collegium of Economic Analysis, Warsaw School of Economics, 162 Niepodległości Street, 02-554 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Leszek Ziora

    (Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology, 19B Armii Krajowej Street, 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland)

Abstract

Smart cities are an extremely important, multi-faceted subject, both in terms of their practical aspects and in terms of research. This is expressed, among other things, in the multitude of approaches to this concept. These approaches differ based on the emphasis placed on individual aspects: some focus more on technology, and others put more weight on social issues, while still others value sustainable development issues. Currently, an important topic of discussion about the development of the smart city—the importance of which has become even greater in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic—is the digital transformation of the city. The use of robotic process automation (RPA) tools can be a part of such a transformation, as such tools, using advanced software, enable the automation of those tasks carried out thus far by humans. Although such an approach has, to date, been widespread in the case of enterprises (in particular, those operating in the financial and BPO/SSC sectors, but less often in the utilities sector, the first applications of these solutions in the context of process automation for cities are also beginning to emerge in various parts of the world. This article is based on a case study approach. The implementation conditions (including the constraints) of such an approach, the benefits achieved, and the lessons learned (which can be important for other local government units) are outlined using the example of the Bydgoszcz city hall’s (Poland) electricity billing document management. The results of the case study presented here lead to the conclusion that the use of RPA tools enables, very quickly and at relatively low cost, measurable results to be achieved that are related to the processing of electricity billing documentation for the city of Bydgoszcz. This allows the assertion to be made that robotic process automation can be taken into consideration as one of the tools used to build smart cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrzej Sobczak & Leszek Ziora, 2021. "The Use of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) as an Element of Smart City Implementation: A Case Study of Electricity Billing Document Management at Bydgoszcz City Hall," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:5191-:d:619448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/5191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/5191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willcocks, Leslie & Lacity, Mary & Craig, Andrew, 2017. "Robotic process automation: strategic transformation lever for global business services?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 71146, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Toru Yamamoto & Hirofumi Hayama & Takao Hayashi & Taro Mori, 2020. "Automatic Energy-Saving Operations System Using Robotic Process Automation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Sorin ANAGNOSTE, 2018. "Setting Up a Robotic Process Automation Center of Excellence," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 6(2), pages 307-322, June.
    4. Sorin ANAGNOSTE, 2018. "The Road to Intelligent Automation in the Energy Sector," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 6(3), pages 489-502, September.
    5. Peter M. Bican & Alexander Brem, 2020. "Digital Business Model, Digital Transformation, Digital Entrepreneurship: Is There A Sustainable “Digital”?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Anagnoste Sorin, 2018. "Robotic Automation Process – The operating system for the digital enterprise," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 54-69, May.
    7. André Luis Azevedo Guedes & Jeferson Carvalho Alvarenga & Maurício Dos Santos Sgarbi Goulart & Martius Vicente Rodriguez y Rodriguez & Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares, 2018. "Smart Cities: The Main Drivers for Increasing the Intelligence of Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Gusti Ayu Made Suartika & Alexander Cuthbert, 2020. "The Sustainable Imperative—Smart Cities, Technology and Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcin Janusz & Marcin Kowalczyk, 2022. "How Smart Are V4 Cities? Evidence from the Multidimensional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Costa Diogo António da Silva & Mamede Henrique São & Mira da Silva Miguel, 2022. "Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Aristotelis Mavidis & Dimitris Folinas, 2022. "From Public E-Procurement 3.0 to E-Procurement 4.0; A Critical Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Meijing Song & Yuan Xiao & Yige Zhou, 2023. "How Does the Smart City Policy Influence Digital Infrastructure? Spatial Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcin Janusz & Marcin Kowalczyk, 2022. "How Smart Are V4 Cities? Evidence from the Multidimensional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Roşca Vlad I., 2020. "Implications of Lewin’s Field Theory on Social Change," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 617-625, July.
    3. Abhilasha Singh & Apurva Shaurya, 2021. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence on HR practices in the UAE," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Chenglei Xu & Shuxin Zhu & Boru Yang & Bin Miao & Yi Duan, 2023. "A Review of Policy Framework Research on Promoting Sustainable Transformation of Digital Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Lill Sarv & Ralf-Martin Soe, 2021. "Transition towards Smart City: The Case of Tallinn," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Marina Díaz-Piloneta & Francisco Ortega-Fernández & Henar Morán-Palacios & Vicente Rodríguez-Montequín, 2021. "Monitoring the Implementation of Exponential Organizations through the Assessment of Their Project Portfolio: Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Broccardo, Laura & Zicari, Adrián & Jabeen, Fauzia & Bhatti, Zeeshan A., 2023. "How digitalization supports a sustainable business model: A literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Krakau, Jan & Feldmann, Carsten & Kaupe, Victor, 2021. "Robotic process automation in logistics: Implementation model and factors of success," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Adapting to the Future: Maritime and City Logistics in the Context of Digitalization and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conf, volume 32, pages 219-256, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    9. Silviu Răileanu & Theodor Borangiu & Ionuț Lențoiu & Mihnea Constantinescu, 2024. "Optimizing Energy Consumption of Industrial Robots with Model-Based Layout Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Habib M. Alshuwaikhat & Yusuf A. Adenle & Thamer Almuhaidib, 2022. "A Lifecycle-Based Smart Sustainable City Strategic Framework for Realizing Smart and Sustainability Initiatives in Riyadh City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    11. José Augusto Paixão Gomes & Luciane Ferreira Alcoforado & André Luis Azevedo Guedes & Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares & Orlando Celso Longo, 2020. "Perception of the Impacts of Urban Mobility Interventions in the Niterói Oceanic Region, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Giacosa, Elisa & Culasso, Francesca & Crocco, Edoardo, 2022. "Customer agility in the modern automotive sector: how lead management shapes agile digital companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    13. Florian Diener & Miroslav Špaček, 2021. "Digital Transformation in Banking: A Managerial Perspective on Barriers to Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, February.
    14. Igor M. Stepnov & Yulia A. Kovalchuk, 2020. "Measuring value created by business models in the sharing economy," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(5), pages 58-69, November.
    15. Justyna Żywiołek & Francesco Schiavone, 2021. "Perception of the Quality of Smart City Solutions as a Sense of Residents’ Safety," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Konstantinos Kourtzanidis & Komninos Angelakoglou & Vasilis Apostolopoulos & Paraskevi Giourka & Nikolaos Nikolopoulos, 2021. "Assessing Impact, Performance and Sustainability Potential of Smart City Projects: Towards a Case Agnostic Evaluation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-38, July.
    17. Regina Veckalne & Tatjana Tambovceva, 2023. "Evaluating Urban Sustainability in Uzbekistan: A Novel Formula for Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, April.
    18. Houda Chkarat & Tarek Abid & Loïc Sauvée, 2023. "Conditions for a Convergence between Digital Platforms and Sustainability in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, September.
    19. Xiao Han & Menghan Zhang & Yixuan Hu & Yuan Huang, 2022. "Study on the Digital Transformation Capability of Cost Consultation Enterprises Based on Maturity Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Hasmawaty & Yulis Tyagita Utami & Darius Antoni, 2022. "Building Green Smart City Capabilities in South Sumatra, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:5191-:d:619448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.