IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/brcebe/v1y2014i1p555-560n97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role Of The Work Force Skills In Innovation Process In A Flexicurity Culture – The Romanian Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Pasnicu Daniela

    (Spiru Haret University and National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection, Bucharest, danielapasnicu@incsmps.ro)

  • Tudose Gabriela

    (National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection, Bucharest, tudose@incsmps.ro)

Abstract

In the context of flexicurity, lifelong learning is essential in keeping people in employment. It is important because it ensures initial good quality education, key skills and a good as possible correspondence between new skills and better jobs. The increased flexibility of labour market, due to the need of its adaptability to the new challenges and increased competitiveness, must be balanced by instant flexible lifelong learning programs, which promote innovation and creativity (learning by doing and learning by using). The article defines innovation and skills, investigates the role of labor market skills in the innovation process, describes and quantifies the diversity of skills and occupations involved in specific types of innovation activity. Having in mind Romanian’s low public funding compared to the EU States, the principles of the innovation policy and main directions of action are established in order to promote innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Pasnicu Daniela & Tudose Gabriela, 2014. "The Role Of The Work Force Skills In Innovation Process In A Flexicurity Culture – The Romanian Case Study," Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Sciendo, vol. 1(1), pages 555-560, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:brcebe:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:555-560:n:97
    DOI: 10.2478/cplbu-2014-0097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/cplbu-2014-0097
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/cplbu-2014-0097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilthagen, Ton, 1998. "Flexicurity: A new paradigm for labour market policy reform?," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment FS I 98-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keller, Berndt & Seifert, Hartmut, 2002. "Flexicurity: Wie lassen sich Flexibilität und soziale Sicherheit vereinbaren? (Flexicurity - how can flexibility and social security be reconciled?)," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 35(1), pages 90-106.
    2. Tangian, Andranik, 2009. "Six families of flexicurity indicators developed at the Hans Boeckler Foundation," WSI Working Papers 168, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    3. repec:ilo:ilowps:410210 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Erling Rasmussen & Jens Lind & Jelle Visser, 2004. "Divergence in Part‐Time Work in New Zealand, the Netherlands and Denmark," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 42(4), pages 637-658, December.
    5. Brown, Alessio J. G. & Snower, Dennis J., 2009. "Incentives and complementarities of flexicurity," Kiel Working Papers 1526, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Asada, Toichiro & Flaschel, Peter & Greiner, Alfred & Proaño, Christian R., 2011. "Sustainable capitalism: Full-employment flexicurity growth with real wage rigidities," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 248-264, March.
    7. Kemmerling, Achim, 2001. "Die Messung des Sozialstaates: Beschäftigungspolitische Unterschiede zwischen Brutto- und Nettosozialleistungsquote," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment FS I 01-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Daniela Zirra, 2012. "Evolution And Trends Of Flexicurity In The Current Context Of Economic And Social Development," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 7(1), pages 60-74, March.
    9. Martin Myant, 2015. "European Union and labour’s legal resources in Central and East European Countries," Discussion Papers 28, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    10. Meer, Marc van der. & Liempt, Adriaan van., 2002. "The trade-off between competitiveness and employment in collective bargaining : the national consultation process and four cases of company bargaining in the Netherlands," ILO Working Papers 993688923402676, International Labour Organization.
    11. repec:aia:aiaswp:wp1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Kemmerling, Achim, 2007. "The end of work or work without end? The role of voters' beliefs in shaping policies of early exit," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2007-108, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    13. Räisänen, Heikki & Schmid, Günther, 2008. "Transitional labour markets and flexicurity from the Finnish labour market point of view," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2008-108, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    14. Keller, Berndt & Seifert, Hartmut, 2002. "Flexicurity: Wie lassen sich Flexibilität und soziale Sicherheit vereinbaren? (Flexicurity - how can flexibility and social security be reconciled?)," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 35(1), pages 90-106.
    15. Keller, Berndt & Seifert, Hartmut, 2002. "Flexicurity: Wie lassen sich Flexibilität und soziale Sicherheit vereinbaren? (Flexicurity - how can flexibility and social security be reconciled?)," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 35(1), pages 90-106.
    16. repec:aia:aiaswp:wp15 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Haak, Carroll & Schmid, Günther, 1999. "Arbeitsmärkte für Künstler und Publizisten: Modelle einer zukünftigen Arbeitswelt?," Papers, Research Network Project "Work and Ecology" P 99-506, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    18. Günther Schmid, 2009. "Transitional Labour Markets, from theory to policy application. Transitional Labour Markets and Flexicurity : Managing Social Risks over the Lifecourse," Post-Print halshs-00435255, HAL.
    19. repec:ilo:ilowps:368892 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Alka Obadiæ, 2009. "Examining the Danish Flexicurity Labour Market Concept," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 12(1), pages 53-71, May.
    21. repec:aia:aiaswp:wp67 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Michael Neugart, 2008. "The choice of insurance in the labor market," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 445-462, March.
    23. Jerzy Kaźmierczyk & Jerzy Kaźmierczyk & Aleksandra Chinalska, 2018. "Flexible forms of employment, an opportunity or a curse for the modern economy? Case study: banks in Poland," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 782-798, December.
    24. Maria Conceição Cerdeira, 2007. "Flexicurity: Core Features of Portuguese Debate," Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, IET/CICS.NOVA-Interdisciplinary Centre on Social Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, vol. 3(3), pages 35-54, November.
    25. M. Robert de Vries & Maarten H. J. Wolbers, 2005. "Non-standard employment relations and wages among school leavers in the Netherlands," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(3), pages 503-525, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:brcebe:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:555-560:n:97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.