IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/bjrecm/v6y2018i1p116-130n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Delay Causing Actor in the Indian Real Estate Project: an AHP-Based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Deep Shumank

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Newcastle,Callaghan2308, NSW, Australia)

  • Asim Mohd

    (Himalayan Institute of Technology and Management, Bakshi Ka Talab,Lucknow227007, UP, India)

  • Kesarwani Neeti

    (Thomas International,New Delhi, India)

  • Kandpal Shweta

    (Aqua Explorers,New Delhi, India)

Abstract

Indian construction is a vital domain with an enormous employment potential and its contribution to the economy. Real estate is an essential domain of construction that tackles the housing demands. In the present scenario, this sector is experiencing a slowdown often failing projects. Thus, the aim is to identify the project participant and attributes that lead to delays in the schedule of real estate projects. In this process, we apply the hierarchical analytical process to identify the actor and the causes that result in an overrun. Our findings suggest that to a significant extent delays occur due to contractors under the influence of distinct factors discussed in the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Deep Shumank & Asim Mohd & Kesarwani Neeti & Kandpal Shweta, 2018. "Identification of Delay Causing Actor in the Indian Real Estate Project: an AHP-Based Approach," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 116-130, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:bjrecm:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:116-130:n:9
    DOI: 10.2478/bjreecm-2018-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjreecm-2018-0009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bjreecm-2018-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matteo Donato & Kamrul Ahsan & Himanshu Shee, 2015. "Resource dependency and collaboration in construction supply chain: literature review and development of a conceptual framework," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 344-364.
    2. Luong Hai Nguyen & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2017. "The Impact of Project Organizational Culture on the Performance of Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Beverley M. Lloyd-walker & Anthony John Mills & Derek H.T. Walker, 2014. "Enabling construction innovation: the role of a no-blame culture as a collaboration behavioural driver in project alliances," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 229-245, March.
    4. Anna Dubois & Lars-Erik Gadde, 2002. "The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 621-631.
    5. Philippe Burger & Ian Hawkesworth, 2011. "How To Attain Value for Money: Comparing PPP and Traditional Infrastructure Public Procurement," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 91-146.
    6. Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio, 2016. "A systematic review of supply chain knowledge management research: State of the art and research opportunities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 276-292.
    7. Ekaterina Osipova & Per Eriksson, 2011. "How procurement options influence risk management in construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(11), pages 1149-1158.
    8. Caridi, Maria & Moretto, Antonella & Perego, Alessandro & Tumino, Angela, 2014. "The benefits of supply chain visibility: A value assessment model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dorothée Allain-Dupré & Claudia Hulbert & Margaux Vincent, 2017. "Subnational Infrastructure Investment in OECD Countries: Trends and Key Governance Levers," OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2017/05, OECD Publishing.
    2. Peter Schnell & Phillip Haag & Hans Christian Jünger, 2022. "Implementation of Digital Technologies in Construction Companies: Establishing a Holistic Process which Addresses Current Barriers," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Kembro, Joakim & Näslund, Dag & Olhager, Jan, 2017. "Information sharing across multiple supply chain tiers: A Delphi study on antecedents," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 77-86.
    4. Beerepoot, Milou & Beerepoot, Niels, 2007. "Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4812-4825, October.
    5. Germán López Pérez & Isabel María García Sánchez & José Luis Zafra Gómez, 2024. "A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of eco‐innovation on financial performance: Identifying barriers and drivers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1321-1340, February.
    6. Per Erik Eriksson & Ossi Pesamaa, 2007. "Modelling procurement effects on cooperation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 893-901.
    7. Wei Daojiang & Li Huimin, 2014. "An Empirical Study on the Influencing Factors of Knowledge Sharing in Project Context," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 154-169, April.
    8. Rudolf Kampf & Silvia Lorincová & Miloš Hitka & Ondrej Stopka, 2017. "Generational Differences in the Perception of Corporate Culture in European Transport Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Marieta Olaru & Doina I. Popescu, 2018. "An Exploratory Study on Knowledge Management Process Barriers in the Oil Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Morgan, Tyler R. & Roath, Anthony S. & Glenn Richey, Robert, 2023. "How risk, transparency, and knowledge influence the adaptability and flexibility dimensions of the responsiveness view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Kesidou, Sofia & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2019. "Supply chain integration for low-carbon buildings: A critical interdisciplinary review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Ralph Tröger & Rainer Alt, 2017. "Design options for supply chain visibility services: learnings from three EPCIS implementations," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(2), pages 141-156, May.
    13. Kokkaew, Nakhon & Oliveira Cruz, Carlos & Alexander, Derek, 2015. "The impact of rule of laws on the recovery of distressed PPP infrastructure Projects," MPRA Paper 77494, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Szász, Levente & Rácz, Béla-Gergely & Scherrer, Maike & Deflorin, Patricia, 2019. "Disseminative capabilities and manufacturing plant roles in the knowledge network of MNCs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 294-304.
    15. Nicholas Thom & Andrew Dawson, 2019. "Sustainable Road Design: Promoting Recycling and Non-Conventional Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-12, November.
    16. Sara Alonso-Muñoz & Rocío González-Sánchez & Cristina Siligardi & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2021. "New Circular Networks in Resilient Supply Chains: An External Capital Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Nicole B. Baker & Christian Haddad, 2024. "Private ownership and management control decisions in infrastructure from the perspective of Transaction Cost Theory: Evidence from emerging economies," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 764-791, July.
    18. Xiaofeng Long & Tong Shu & Shou Chen & Shouyang Wang & Kin Keung Lai & Yan Yang, 2017. "Strategy Analysis of Recycling and Remanufacturing by Remanufacturers in Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-29, October.
    19. Johan Ninan & Stewart Clegg & Steve Burdon & John Clay, 2023. "Reimagining Infrastructure Megaproject Delivery: An Australia—New Zealand Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Antonelli, Cristiano & Gehringer, Agnieszka, 2015. "Knowledge externalities and demand pull: The European evidence," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 608-631.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:bjrecm:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:116-130:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.