IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v20y2002i7p621-631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Dubois
  • Lars-Erik Gadde

Abstract

Previous research suggests that the construction industry is characterized by (1) particular complexity factors owing to industry specific uncertainties and interdependences, and (2) inefficiency of operations. The aim of this study was to analyse the operations and behaviour of firms as a means of dealing with complexity. The observations made indicate that the industry as a whole is featured as a loosely coupled system. Taking this as a starting point, the couplings among activities, resources and actors were analysed in different dimensions. The pattern of couplings builds on two interdependent layers: tight couplings in individual projects and loose couplings based on collective adaptations in the permanent network. It is concluded that the pattern of couplings seems to favour short term productivity while hampering innovation and learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Dubois & Lars-Erik Gadde, 2002. "The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 621-631.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:20:y:2002:i:7:p:621-631
    DOI: 10.1080/01446190210163543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190210163543
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446190210163543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Low Sui Pheng & Mok Sze Hui, 1999. "The application of JIT philosophy to construction: a case study in site layout," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 657-668.
    2. Kreiner, Kristian, 1995. "In search of relevance: Project management in drifting environments," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 335-346, December.
    3. Mazin Shammas-Toma & David Seymour & Leslie Clark, 1998. "Obstacles to implementing total quality management in the UK construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 177-192.
    4. Kadefors, Anna, 1995. "Institutions in building projects: Implications for flexibility and change," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 395-408, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Engwall, Mats, 2003. "No project is an island: linking projects to history and context," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 789-808, May.
    2. Kjell Tryggestad, 2012. "Perspectives on Projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 416-420, February.
    3. Ping Yung, 2015. "A new institutional economic theory of project management," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 228-243, February.
    4. Ahmet DEMIR & Mustafa MUKHLIS, 2017. "An Evaluation Of Gated Communities As A Product: An Empirical Study In Sulaimaniyah, Iraq," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(3), pages 63-84, April.
    5. Olsson, Richard, 1998. "Subcontract coordination in construction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 503-509, September.
    6. Catherine Durnell Cramton & Tine Köhler & Raymond E. Levitt, 2021. "Using scripts to address cultural and institutional challenges of global project coordination," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(1), pages 56-77, February.
    7. Shahid Hussain & Zhu Fangwei & Ahmed Faisal Siddiqi & Zaigham Ali & Muhammad Salman Shabbir, 2018. "Structural Equation Model for Evaluating Factors Affecting Quality of Social Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Kasper Edwards & Robert G. Cooper & Tomas Vedsmand & Giulia Nardelli, 2019. "Evaluating the Agile-Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: Experiences From Three SME Manufacturing Firms," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(08), pages 1-32, December.
    9. Johan Larsson & Per Erik Eriksson & Thomas Olofsson & Peter Simonsson, 2014. "Industrialized construction in the Swedish infrastructure sector: core elements and barriers," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 83-96, February.
    10. Lauri Pulkka & Miro Ristimäki & Karoliina Rajakallio & Seppo Junnila, 2016. "Applicability and benefits of the ecosystem concept in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 129-144, February.
    11. Viljanen, A. & Lähtinen, K. & Kanninen, V. & Toppinen, A., 2023. "A tale of five cities: The role of municipalities in the market diffusion of wooden residential multistory construction and retrofits," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    12. Ina Drejer & Anker Lund Vinding, 2006. "Organisation, 'anchoring' of knowledge, and innovative activity in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 921-931.
    13. Mehmet Tolga Taner, 2013. "Critical Success Factors for Six Sigma Implementation in Large-scale Turkish Construction Companies," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 3(4), pages 212-225.
    14. Per Erik Eriksson & Stefan Olander & Henrik Szentes & Kristian Widén, 2014. "Managing short-term efficiency and long-term development through industrialized construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 97-108, February.
    15. Gul Polat & David Arditi, 2005. "The JIT materials management system in developing countries," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7), pages 697-712.
    16. Pankaj Tiwari & B Suresha, 2021. "Moderating Role of Project Innovativeness on Project Flexibility, Project Risk, Project Performance, and Business Success in Financial Services," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(3), pages 179-196, September.
    17. Borman, Mark & Janssen, Marijn, 2013. "Reconciling two approaches to critical success factors: The case of shared services in the public sector," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 390-400.
    18. Shahin Mokhlesian, 2014. "How Do Contractors Select Suppliers for Greener Construction Projects? The Case of Three Swedish Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-19, June.
    19. Catherine Durnell Cramton & Tine Köhler & Raymond E. Levitt, 0. "Using scripts to address cultural and institutional challenges of global project coordination," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    20. Lars Huemer & Katarina Östergren, 2000. "Strategic change and organizational learning in two 'Swedish' construction firms," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 635-642, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:20:y:2002:i:7:p:621-631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.