IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vra/journl/v9y2020i2p136-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Tax-Based Own Resources and Ecological Sustainability of the EU Budget

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana Gercheva

    (University of Economics - Varna, Varna, Bulgaria)

Abstract

The instant contribution deals with the forthcoming reform of the 'own resources system' of the EU budget. The aforementioned term denotes the revenue side of the common budget in Brussels. All 27 Member States (MSs) contribute annually to the own resources system in terms of sugar levies, import tariffs, VAT - and GNI-based payments. The latter is the most controversial budgetary item since it accounts for the bulk of EU funding, but is not considered a genuinely own resource by MSs. In order to limit EU budgetary dependency on GNI-based national contributions, for the next seven years, 2021-27, a group of experts proposed several tax-based resources. In the present paper, their capacity as genuine own resources for the EU budget is being critically evaluated. Furthermore, it is important for this research to discuss the implications of the suggested tax-based resources for the ecological sustainability of the EU budget.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana Gercheva, 2020. "The Tax-Based Own Resources and Ecological Sustainability of the EU Budget," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 9(2), pages 136-144, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:vra:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:136-144
    DOI: 10.36997/IJUSV-ESS/2020.9.2.136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://su-varna.org/journal/IJUSV-ESS/2020.9.2/136-144.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36997/IJUSV-ESS/2020.9.2.136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7346 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Lawrence Goulder, 1995. "Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 2(2), pages 157-183, August.
    3. repec:diw:diwwpp:dp1689 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Gilbert E. Metcalf, 2005. "Tax Reform and Environmental Taxation," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0519, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    5. Monjon, Stéphanie & Quirion, Philippe, 2011. "Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1957-1971, September.
    6. Margit Schratzenstaller & Alexander Krenek, 2019. "Tax-based Own Resources to Finance the EU Budget," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 54(3), pages 171-177, May.
    7. Naegele, Helene & Zaklan, Aleksandar, 2019. "Does the EU ETS cause carbon leakage in European manufacturing?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 125-147.
    8. Clemens Fuest & Jean Pisani-Ferry, 2020. "Financing the European Union- New Context, New Responses," Bruegel Policy Contributions 38108, Bruegel.
    9. Svetlana Gercheva, 2018. "Ecological Standards and Taxes: Three Years after "Dieselgate"," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 7(2), pages 55-65, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mörsdorf, George, 2022. "A simple fix for carbon leakage? Assessing the environmental effectiveness of the EU carbon border adjustment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Julia Bachtrögler-Unger & Margit Schratzenstaller & Franz Sinabell, 2021. "Der europäische COVID-19-Aufbauplan," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 94(4), pages 321-332, April.
    3. Wifo, 2021. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 4/2021," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 94(4), April.
    4. Niko Korpar & Mario Larch & Roman Stöllinger, 2022. "Comparing Scenarios for a European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Trade, FDI and Welfare Effects with a Focus on the Austrian Economy," wiiw Research Reports 460, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    5. Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline & Mouez Fodha, 2023. "Debt, tax and environmental policy [Dette, taxe et politique environnementale]," Post-Print halshs-04181981, HAL.
    6. Agime Gerbeti, 2021. "Market Mechanisms for Reducing Emissions and the Introduction of a Flexible Consumption Tax," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 161-178, December.
    7. Ottmar Edenhofer & Max Franks & Matthias Kalkuhl, 2021. "Pigou in the 21st Century: a tribute on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the publication of The Economics of Welfare," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 28(5), pages 1090-1121, October.
    8. Christoph Böhringer & Brita Bye & Taran Fæhn & Knut Einar Rosendahl, 2017. "Output-based rebating of carbon taxes in a neighbour's backyard: Competitiveness, leakage and welfare," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(2), pages 426-455, May.
    9. Alexander Krenek & Mark Sommer & Margit Schratzenstaller-Altzinger, 2020. "A WTO-compatible Border Tax Adjustment for the ETS to Finance the EU Budget," WIFO Working Papers 596, WIFO.
    10. Julia Bachtrögler-Unger & Margit Schratzenstaller & Franz Sinabell, 2021. "Der europäische COVID-19-Aufbauplan," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 94(4), pages 321-334, April.
    11. Zhong, Jiarui & Pei, Jiansuo, 2022. "Beggar thy neighbor? On the competitiveness and welfare impacts of the EU's proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    12. Svetlana Gercheva, 2021. "Recycling of Carbon Revenues in Bulgaria," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 10(3), pages 54-62, December.
    13. Pan, Xian & Yu, Lihong, 2024. "Do China's pilot emissions trading schemes lead to domestic carbon leakage? Perspective from the firm relocation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    14. Zhou, Bo & Zhang, Cheng & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn, 2020. "Does emission trading lead to carbon leakage in China? Direction and channel identifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    15. Rohan Best & Paul J. Burke, 2020. "Energy mix persistence and the effect of carbon pricing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 555-574, July.
    16. Claudia Kettner-Marx & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig, 2018. "Carbon Taxes from an Economic Perspective," WIFO Working Papers 554, WIFO.
    17. Carolyn Fischer & Richard D. Morgenstern, 2006. "Carbon Abatement Costs: Why the Wide Range of Estimates?," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 73-86.
    18. Schünemann, Johannes & Trimborn, Timo, 2023. "Boosting taxes for boasting about houses? Status concerns in the housing market," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 120-143.
    19. MUNK, Knud J., 2011. "Optimal taxation in the presence of a congested public good and an application to transport policy," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2011057, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    20. Agnar Sandmo, 2003. "Environmental Taxation and Revenue for Development," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2003-86, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tax-based own resources; EU budget; sustainability; ecological sustainability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F36 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vra:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:136-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pavel Petrov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevecea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.