On the Design of the Appeals Process: The Optimal Use of Discretionary Review versus Direct Appeal
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1086/605094
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Shavell, Steven, 1995. "The Appeals Process as a Means of Error Correction," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(2), pages 379-426, June.
- Theodore Eisenberg & Michael Heise, 2009. "Plaintiphobia in State Courts? An Empirical Study of State Court Trials on Appeal," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(1), pages 121-155, January.
- Andrew F. Daughety & Jennifer F. Reinganum, 2000. "Appealing Judgments," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 31(3), pages 502-526, Autumn.
- Charles M. Cameron & Lewis A. Kornhauser, 2005. "Decision Rules in a Judicial Hierarchy," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 161(2), pages 264-292, June.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Florian Smuda & Patrice Bougette & Kai Hüschelrath, 2015.
"Determinants of the Duration of European Appellate Court Proceedings in Cartel Cases,"
Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 1352-1369, November.
- Florian Smuda & Patrice Bougette & Kai Hüschelrath, 2014. "Determinants of the Duration of European Appellate Court Proceedings in Cartel Cases," GREDEG Working Papers 2014-25, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
- Florian Smuda & Patrice Bougette & Kai Hüschelrath, 2015. "Determinants of the Duration of European Appellate Court Proceedings in Cartel Cases," Post-Print halshs-01163299, HAL.
- Smuda, Florian & Bougette, Patrice & Hüschelrath, Kai, 2014. "Determinants of the duration of European appellate court proceedings in cartel cases," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-062, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Sofia Amaral-Garcia, 2015. "Non-economic Damages in Medical Malpractice Appeals: Does the Jurisdiction Make a Difference?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1506, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
- repec:pri:indrel:dsp012v23vt39h is not listed on IDEAS
- Theodore Eisenberg & Henry S. Farber, 2013.
"Why Do Plaintiffs Lose Appeals? Biased Trial Courts, Litigious Losers, or Low Trial Win Rates?,"
American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 15(1), pages 73-109.
- Theodore Eisenberg & Henry S. Farber, 2011. "Why do Plaintiffs Lose Appeals? Biased Trial Courts, Litigious Losers, or Low Trial Win Rates?," Working Papers 1329, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
- Kai Hüschelrath & Florian Smuda, 2016. "The Appeals Process in the European Commission's Cartel Cases: An Empirical Assessment," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 330-357, June.
- Michael Hellwig & Kai Hüschelrath & Ulrich Laitenberger, 2018.
"Settlements and Appeals in the European Commission’s Cartel Cases: An Empirical Assessment,"
Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 52(1), pages 55-84, February.
- Hellwig, Michael & Hüschelrath, Kai & Laitenberger, Ulrich, 2016. "Settlements and appeals in the European Commission's cartel cases: An empirical assessment," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-010, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Michael Hellwig & Kai Hüschelrath & Ulrich Laitenberger, 2018. "Settlements and Appeals in the European Commission’s Cartel Cases: An Empirical Assessment," Post-Print hal-02163672, HAL.
- Wohlschlegel, Ansgar, 2014. "The Appeals Process and Incentives to Settle," MPRA Paper 59424, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Bertrand Chopard & Edwige Marion & Ludivine Roussey, 2014.
"Does the Appeals Process Lower the Occurrence of Legal Errors?,"
EconomiX Working Papers
2014-43, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
- Bertrand Chopard & Edwige Marion & Ludivine Roussey, 2014. "Does the Appeals Process Lower the Occurrence of Legal Errors?," Working Papers hal-04141314, HAL.
- Svetlana Avdasheva & Svetlana Golovanova & Elena Sidorova, 2022. "Does judicial effort matter for quality? Evidence from antitrust proceedings in Russian commercial courts," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 425-450, June.
- Hüschelrath, Kai & Smuda, Florian, 2014. "The appeals process: An empirical assessment," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-063, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Berlemann, Michael & Christmann, Robin, 2017. "The Role of Precedents on Court Delay - Evidence from a civil law country," MPRA Paper 80057, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Gilat Levy, 2005.
"Careerist Judges,"
RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(2), pages 275-297, Summer.
- Levy, Gilat, 2003. "Careerist Judges," CEPR Discussion Papers 3948, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Levy, Gilat, 2005. "Careerist judges," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 939, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Levy, Gilat, 2003. "Careerist judges," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 3621, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Gilat Levy, 2003. "Careerist Judges," STICERD - Theoretical Economics Paper Series 457, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
- Pierre Bentata & Romain Espinosa & Yolande Hiriart, 2019.
"Correction Activities by France’s Supreme Courts and Control over their Dockets,"
Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 129(2), pages 169-204.
- Pierre Bentata & Romain Espinosa & Yolande Hiriart, 2019. "Correction Activities by France’s Supreme Courts and Control over their Dockets," Post-Print halshs-02167246, HAL.
- Bertrand Chopard & Edwige Marion & Ludivine Roussey, 2014.
"Does the Appeals Process Lower the Occurrence of Legal Errors?,"
EconomiX Working Papers
2014-43, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
- Bertrand Chopard & Edwige Marion & Ludivine Roussey, 2014. "Does the Appeals Process Lower the Occurrence of Legal Errors?," Working Papers hal-04141314, HAL.
- Hüschelrath, Kai & Smuda, Florian, 2014. "The appeals process: An empirical assessment," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-063, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Adam B. Badawi & Scott Baker, 2015. "Appellate Lawmaking in a Judicial Hierarchy," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(1), pages 139-172.
- Luca Anderlini & Leonardo Felli & Alessandro Riboni, 2014.
"Why Stare Decisis?,"
Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 17(4), pages 726-738, October.
- Luca Anderlini & Leonardo Felli & Alessandro Riboni, 2010. "Why Stare Decisis?," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000000068, David K. Levine.
- Anderlini, Luca & Felli, Leonardo & Riboni, Alessandro, 2011. "Why Stare Decisis?," CEPR Discussion Papers 8266, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Maria Antonelli & Veronica Grembi, 2013. "A microeconomic model of the demand of civil justice: is one institutional context better than another?," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 295-318, October.
- Deffains, Bruno & Gabuthy, Yannick & Lambert, Eve-Angéline, 2010.
"Labour disputes, investment decisions and the judiciary,"
Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 424-433, April.
- Bruno Deffains & Yannick Gabuthy & Eve-Angéline Lambert, 2010. "Labour Disputes, Investment Decisions and the Judiciary," Post-Print hal-00485100, HAL.
- Pierre Bentata & Yolande Hiriart, 2015.
"Biased Judges: Evidence from French Environmental Cases,"
Working Papers
2015-17, CRESE.
- Pierre Bentata & Yolande Hiriart, 2015. "Biased Judges: Evidence from French Environmental Cases," Working Papers hal-01377922, HAL.
- Anderlini, Luca & Felli, Leonardo & Riboni, Alessandro, 2020.
"Legal efficiency and consistency,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
- Luca Anderlini & Leonardo Felli & Alessandro Riboni, 2016. "Legal Efficiency and Consistency," Working Papers 2016-22, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
- Luca Anderlini & Leonardo Felli & Alessandro Riboni, 2018. "Legal Efficiency and Consistency," Working Papers gueconwpa~18-18-12, Georgetown University, Department of Economics.
- Steven Shavell, 2004. "The Appeals Process and Adjudicator Incentives," NBER Working Papers 10754, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Michael Hellwig & Kai Hüschelrath & Ulrich Laitenberger, 2018.
"Settlements and Appeals in the European Commission’s Cartel Cases: An Empirical Assessment,"
Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 52(1), pages 55-84, February.
- Hellwig, Michael & Hüschelrath, Kai & Laitenberger, Ulrich, 2016. "Settlements and appeals in the European Commission's cartel cases: An empirical assessment," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-010, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Michael Hellwig & Kai Hüschelrath & Ulrich Laitenberger, 2018. "Settlements and Appeals in the European Commission’s Cartel Cases: An Empirical Assessment," Post-Print hal-02163672, HAL.
- Florian Smuda & Patrice Bougette & Kai Hüschelrath, 2015.
"Determinants of the Duration of European Appellate Court Proceedings in Cartel Cases,"
Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 1352-1369, November.
- Florian Smuda & Patrice Bougette & Kai Hüschelrath, 2014. "Determinants of the Duration of European Appellate Court Proceedings in Cartel Cases," GREDEG Working Papers 2014-25, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
- Florian Smuda & Patrice Bougette & Kai Hüschelrath, 2015. "Determinants of the Duration of European Appellate Court Proceedings in Cartel Cases," Post-Print halshs-01163299, HAL.
- Smuda, Florian & Bougette, Patrice & Hüschelrath, Kai, 2014. "Determinants of the duration of European appellate court proceedings in cartel cases," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-062, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Bharat Bhole & Bríd Gleeson Hanna, 2009. "An analytical framework for interpreting appellate court data," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(2), pages 1163-1174.
- Wohlschlegel, Ansgar, 2014. "The Appeals Process and Incentives to Settle," MPRA Paper 59424, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Roy Gava, 2022. "Challenging the regulators: Enforcement and appeals in financial regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1265-1282, October.
- Aspasia Tsaoussi & Eleni Zervogianni, 2010. "Judges as satisficers: a law and economics perspective on judicial liability," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 333-357, June.
- Kamphorst, Jurjen J.A. & van Velthoven, Ben C.J., 2009.
"The introduction of an appeals court in Dutch tax litigation,"
International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 13-24, March.
- Kamphorst, Jurjen J.A. & Van Velthoven, Ben C.J., 2006. "The introduction of an appeals court in Dutch tax litigation," MPRA Paper 2008, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 27 Apr 2006.
- Jia, Hao & Skaperdas, Stergios & Vaidya, Samarth, 2013.
"Contest functions: Theoretical foundations and issues in estimation,"
International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 211-222.
- Hao Jia & Stergios Skaperdas & Samarth Vaidya, 2012. "Contest Functions: Theoretical Foundations and Issues in Estimation," Working Papers 111214, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics.
- Kirstein, Roland & Schmidtchen, Dieter, 1997.
"Judicial detection skill and contractual compliance,"
International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 509-520, December.
- Kirstein, Roland & Schmidtchen, Dieter, 1997. "Judicial Detection Skill and Contractual Compliance," CSLE Discussion Paper Series 97-07, Saarland University, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:39:y:2010:i:1:p:63-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.