IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v23y2021i1p557-567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengthening the Icon Management of Kampung Kopi Village in Malang of Indonesia by Improving the Quality of Production and Marketing for Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Agung Winarno

    (Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Malang)

  • Yuli Agustina

    (Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Malang)

  • Bagus Shandy Narmaditya

    (Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Malang)

  • Wiwik Wahyuni

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Malang)

Abstract

Malang regency of East Java is well-known for its numerous agricultural crops. One of them is coffee, which is grown in Benjor Village, Tumpang District. The area is one of the coffee bean growers in the Malang Regency. Typically, farmers sell their coffee in the form of logs, unprocessed. Numerous coffee harvests are lost, and the quality of the crop is deteriorating. As a result, farmers earn a pitiful amount of money. This project aims to empower the Benjor Village, Tumpang District, Malang Regency community of coffee grower groups. The activities began with the process of identifying and executing methods for optimizing coffee yields through the use of post-harvest processing technology to improve the quality of coffee beans and hence boost the selling price. Program planning, execution, monitoring, and evaluation are the strategies employed. The findings indicate that not all groups of coffee farmers in Benjor Village, Tumpang District, Malang Regency have the knowledge and abilities necessary to research and apply technology to maximize their postharvest coffee yields. Even though this can result in a higher selling price for coffee. Therefore, the public's attention is opened to the potential for greater diversification of post-harvest coffee products.

Suggested Citation

  • Agung Winarno & Yuli Agustina & Bagus Shandy Narmaditya & Wiwik Wahyuni, 2021. "Strengthening the Icon Management of Kampung Kopi Village in Malang of Indonesia by Improving the Quality of Production and Marketing for Farmers," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 23(1), pages 557-567, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:23:y:2021:i:1:p:557-567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4517/1598
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4517
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inma Borrella & Carlos Mataix & Ruth Carrasco‐Gallego, 2015. "Smallholder Farmers in the Speciality Coffee Industry: Opportunities, Constraints and the Businesses that are Making it Possible," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(3), pages 29-44, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghoshray, Atanu, 2021. "Are coffee farmers worse off in the long run?," 95th Annual Conference, March 29-30, 2021, Warwick, UK (Hybrid) 311084, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    2. Katherine Fuller & Carola Grebitus, 2023. "Consumers' preferences and willingness to pay for coffee sustainability labels," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1007-1025, October.
    3. Hidalgo, Francisco & Quiñones-Ruiz, Xiomara F. & Birkenberg, Athena & Daum, Thomas & Bosch, Christine & Hirsch, Patrick & Birner, Regina, 2023. "Digitalization, sustainability, and coffee. Opportunities and challenges for agricultural development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    4. German, Laura A. & Bonanno, Anya M. & Foster, Laura Catherine & Cotula, Lorenzo, 2020. "“Inclusive business” in agriculture: Evidence from the evolution of agricultural value chains," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    5. Asian, Sobhan & Hafezalkotob, Ashkan & John, Jubin Jacob, 2019. "Sharing economy in organic food supply chains: A pathway to sustainable development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 322-338.
    6. Lemeilleur, S. & Subervie, J. & Presoto, A.E. & de Castro Souza, R. & Macchione Saes, M.S., 2016. "Eco-certified contract choice among coffee farmers in Brazil," Working Papers MoISA 201604, UMR MoISA : Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (social and nutritional sciences): CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRAE, L'Institut Agro, Montpellier SupAgro, IRD - Montpellier, France.
    7. Janina Grabs & Sophia Louise Carodenuto, 2021. "Traders as sustainability governance actors in global food supply chains: A research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1314-1332, February.
    8. Ghoshray, Atanu, 2022. "Trends and persistence of farm-gate coffee prices around the world," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321166, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    9. Lauren Rosenberg & Mark Swilling & Walter J V Vermeulen, 2018. "Practices of Third Wave Coffee: A Burundian Producer's Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 199-214, February.
    10. Evie Smith & Lisa Antoshak & Patrick H. Brown, 2022. "Grounds for Collaboration: A Model for Improving Coffee Sustainability Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Antonella Samoggia & Andrea Fantini, 2023. "Revealing the Governance Dynamics of the Coffee Chain in Colombia: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Sylvaine Lemeilleur & Julie Subervie & Anderson Edilson Presoto & Roberta de Castro Souza & Maria Sylvia Macchione Saes, 2020. "Coffee farmers’ motivations to comply with sustainability standards," Post-Print halshs-02278751, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Kampung Kopi; Coffee; Production Quality; Village Icon;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:23:y:2021:i:1:p:557-567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.