IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v17y2021i1p343-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Development of Lie Tulip Salon Using a Canvas Business Model

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Sylvia

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Widyatama University, Bandung, Indonesia)

  • Yelli Eka Sumadhinata

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Widyatama University, Bandung, Indonesia)

Abstract

This research focuses on Lie Tulip Salon and Spa which works in the field of beauty salon services and beauty treatments. This study aims to examine the application of the canvas business model at Lie Tulip's salons and spas. This research is a qualitative descriptive study that describes the Canvas Business Model at Lie Tulip's salon and spa using SWOT analysis. The data collection method was carried out by conducting interviews and taking documentation. The results of this study prove that the consumer segmentation in this company is female consumers with an average age of 15-60 years. In addition, the channel operated by this company is to build good communication with its customers, and to provide the best and professional service. Lie tulip salon and spa always conducts service standardization training for its employees. Furthermore, this company can establish good relationships with the suppliers of cosmetic products. Finally, the cost structure in this company shows that the biggest cost factor in the company is the salary of the experts.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Sylvia & Yelli Eka Sumadhinata, 2021. "Business Development of Lie Tulip Salon Using a Canvas Business Model," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 17(1), pages 343-354, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:17:y:2021:i:1:p:343-354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/2664/1063
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/2664
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernando E. García-Muiña & María Sonia Medina-Salgado & Anna Maria Ferrari & Marco Cucchi, 2020. "Sustainability Transition in Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing with the Triple-Layered Business Model Canvas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. William D. Bygrave & Charles W. Hofer, 1992. "Theorizing about Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(2), pages 13-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nadhirah Nordin & Nur Amani Aisyah Samsuddin & Rahimah Embong & Azlin Alisa Ahmad & Rossidi Usop & Siti Khatijah Ismail & Suraya Ismail, 2022. "Developing Business Model Based on Islamic Classical Economic Thoughts," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 11, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Federica Murmura & Laura Bravi & Gilberto Santos, 2021. "Sustainable Process and Product Innovation in the Eyewear Sector: The Role of Industry 4.0 Enabling Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Andrés Fernández-Miguel & Maria Pia Riccardi & Valerio Veglio & Fernando E. García-Muiña & Alfonso P. Fernández del Hoyo & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2022. "Disruption in Resource-Intensive Supply Chains: Reshoring and Nearshoring as Strategies to Enable Them to Become More Resilient and Sustainable," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Roberto Hernández-Chea & Akriti Jain & Nancy M. P. Bocken & Anjula Gurtoo, 2021. "The Business Model in Sustainability Transitions: A Conceptualization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    4. Theerasak Nitlarp & Supaporn Kiattisin, 2022. "The Impact Factors of Industry 4.0 on ESG in the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Per Davidsson & Jan Henrik Gruenhagen, 2021. "Fulfilling the Process Promise: A Review and Agenda for New Venture Creation Process Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 1083-1118, September.
    6. Rebean Al-Silefanee & Niels Bosma, 2024. "Uncovering Determinants of Entrepreneurial Behaviour in a Transitioning Economy: A Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 33(1), pages 34-58, February.
    7. Panagiotis Stavropoulos & Alexios Papacharalampopoulos & Konstantinos Tzimanis & Demetris Petrides & George Chryssolouris, 2021. "On the Relationship between Circular and Innovation Approach to Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Andreas Felsberger & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Sustainable Industry 4.0 in Production and Operations Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-39, September.
    9. Magdalena Zioło & Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz, 2023. "Theoretical framework of sustainable value creation by companies. What do we know so far?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2344-2361, September.
    10. Loliya Agbani Akobo, 2018. "Action learning through radio: exploring conceptual views and lived experiences of women entrepreneurs," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 235-248, September.
    11. Rok Črešnar & Zlatko Nedelko, 2020. "Understanding Future Leaders: How Are Personal Values of Generations Y and Z Tailored to Leadership in Industry 4.0?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Nunzia Capobianco & Vincenzo Basile & Francesca Loia & Roberto Vona, 2021. "Toward a Sustainable Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms in the Oil and Gas Industry: A PESTLE Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Wang, Rui & Guo, Li-ming & Cao, Chao & Chen, Yan-sheng, 2023. "The key success factors of the AI industry entrepreneurial process in China Great Bay Area: A systematic approach study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    14. Małgorzata Dobrowolska & Lilla Knop, 2020. "Fit to Work in the Business Models of the Industry 4.0 Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Xiaoxia Chen & Mélanie Despeisse & Björn Johansson, 2020. "Environmental Sustainability of Digitalization in Manufacturing: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-31, December.
    16. Stephany Isabel Vallarta-Serrano & Edgar Santoyo-Castelazo & Edgar Santoyo & Esther O. García-Mandujano & Holkan Vázquez-Sánchez, 2023. "Integrated Sustainability Assessment Framework of Industry 4.0 from an Energy Systems Thinking Perspective: Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-30, July.
    17. Marco Vacchi & Cristina Siligardi & Erika Iveth Cedillo-González & Anna Maria Ferrari & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "Industry 4.0 and Smart Data as Enablers of the Circular Economy in Manufacturing: Product Re-Engineering with Circular Eco-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Theerasak Nitlarp & Theeraya Mayakul, 2023. "The Implications of Triple Transformation on ESG in the Energy Sector: Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Findings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, February.
    19. Arash Najmaei & Zahra Sadeghinejad, 2023. "Green and sustainable business models: historical roots, growth trajectory, conceptual architecture and an agenda for future research—A bibliometric review of green and sustainable business models," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 957-999, February.
    20. Marco Vacchi & Cristina Siligardi & Fabio Demaria & Erika Iveth Cedillo-González & Rocío González-Sánchez & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "Technological Sustainability or Sustainable Technology? A Multidimensional Vision of Sustainability in Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business model; Canvas; SWOT analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:17:y:2021:i:1:p:343-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.