IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v37y2017i11-12p783-799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of professionalization and partnerships on nonprofit productivity

Author

Listed:
  • María José Sanzo-Perez
  • Marta Rey-García
  • Luis Ignacio Álvarez-González

Abstract

This research evaluates the influence of professionalization and partnering with firms on nonprofit productivity. Professionalization is measured in terms of the ratio of paid employees to volunteers, and productivity is measured through the ratio of total assets to number of beneficiaries, and the ratio of total revenues to number of paid employees and volunteers. Empirical analysis combines a survey to a representative sample of Spanish nonprofits, with information available from public sources. Results confirm the existence of a ‘U-shaped’ relationship between professionalization and nonprofits’ capability to reach more beneficiaries with lower assets; a positive effect of professionalization on revenue generation capability; and a positive effect of partnerships with businesses on the nonprofit’s asset-per-beneficiary ratio. Discussion sheds light on the on-going debate about the implications of professionalization and partnering with firms for the capacity of nonprofit organizations to attract resources and to extend their reach in a more efficient way.

Suggested Citation

  • María José Sanzo-Perez & Marta Rey-García & Luis Ignacio Álvarez-González, 2017. "The impact of professionalization and partnerships on nonprofit productivity," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(11-12), pages 783-799, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:37:y:2017:i:11-12:p:783-799
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2017.1353976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2017.1353976
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2017.1353976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Commission, Productivity, 2010. "Contribution of the Not-for-Profit Sector," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorne Cummings & Maria Dyball & Jessica (Jin Hua) Chen, 2010. "Voluntary Disclosures as a Mechanism for Defining Entity Status in Australian Not-for-Profit Organisations," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(2), pages 154-164, June.
    2. Kappelides, Pam & Spoor, Jennifer, 2019. "Managing sport volunteers with a disability: Human resource management implications," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 694-707.
    3. Carolyn J. Cordery & Dalice Sim & Tony Zijl & Gary Monroe, 2017. "Differentiated regulation: the case of charities," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(1), pages 131-164, March.
    4. Jade Wong & Andreas Ortman, 2013. "Do Donors Care About the Price of Giving? A Review of the Evidence, with Some Theory to Organize It," Discussion Papers 2013-22, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    5. Jenny Green & Bronwen Dalton, 2016. "Out of the Shadows: Using Value Pluralism to Make Explicit Economic Values in Not-for-Profit Business Strategies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 299-312, December.
    6. Muir, Kristy & Michaux, Fabienne & Sharam, Andrea & Flatau, Paul & Meltzer, Ariella & Moran, Michael & Heaney, Richard & North, Gill & Webb, Eileen & Mason, Chris, 2018. "Inquiry into social impact investment for housing and homelessness outcomes," SocArXiv fcjbg, Center for Open Science.
    7. Fara Azmat & Ruth Rentschler, 2017. "Gender and Ethnic Diversity on Boards and Corporate Responsibility: The Case of the Arts Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 317-336, March.
    8. Hall, Matthew & O'Dwyer, Brendan, 2017. "Accounting, non-governmental organizations and civil society: The importance of nonprofit organizations to understanding accounting, organizations and society," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-5.
    9. Onyx Jenny & Cham Liz & Dalton Bronwen, 2016. "Current Trends in Australian Nonprofit Policy," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 171-188, June.
    10. Tim Tenbensel & Judith Dwyer & Josée Lavoie, 2014. "How Not to Kill the Golden Goose: Reconceptualizing accountability environments of third-sector organizations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(7), pages 925-944, October.
    11. Daff, Lyn & Parker, Lee D., 2021. "A conceptual model of accountants' communication inside not-for-profit organisations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    12. Martin Loosemore & Jemma Bridgeman, 2017. "Corporate volunteering in the construction industry: motivations, costs and benefits," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 641-653, October.
    13. David Cappo & Fiona Verity, 2014. "Social Inclusion and Integrative Practices," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(1), pages 24-33.
    14. Fanny Salignac & Tracy Wilcox & Axelle Marjolin & Sarah Adams, 2018. "Understanding Collective Impact in Australia: A new approach to interorganizational collaboration," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(1), pages 91-110, February.
    15. Tweedie, Dale & Luzia, Karina, 2023. "In place, with power: (Re)conceptualising accountability in national non-government organisations," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:37:y:2017:i:11-12:p:783-799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.