IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v40y2006i4p289-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector: Evidence from 'Northern Britain'

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Freel
  • Richard Harrison

Abstract

Freel M. S. and Harrison R. T. (2006) Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector: evidence from 'Northern Britain', Regional Studies 40, 289-305. Over the last 20 years, network-based models of innovation-led economic development have grown increasingly popular to both the polity and the academy. In contrast to earlier linear conceptions, innovation is viewed as a systemic phenomenon in which interactive learning and cooperative entrepreneurship are fundamental. The way that systems and, in turn, networks are usually defined is by the volume and characteristics of the linkages that bind them together. Accordingly, drawing upon a recent survey of small firms in Scotland and Northern England (1347 responses), the paper is concerned with mapping the extent of small firm innovation-related networking and understanding the unique contribution such networks make to the successful introduction of new products and processes. Importantly, it investigated the impact of networking on innovation in both manufacturing and services. To this end, the paper notes the positive associations between product innovation success and cooperation with customers and the public sector, and between process innovation success and cooperation with suppliers and universities. It also notes, with caution, the high volume of 'successful' innovators that did not cooperate to innovate. Freel M. S. et Harrison R. T. (2006) L'innovation et la cooperation des petites entreprises: etude de cas du 'nord de la Grande-Bretagne', Regional Studies 40, 289-305. Pendant les vingt dernieres annees, des modeles du developpement economique pilote par l'innovation fondes sur la notion de reseaux sont devenus de plus en plus reconnus dans les milieux politique et academique. Par contraste avec des conceptions anterieures lineaires, on considere l'innovation comme un phenomene systemique dont les notions d'apprentissage interactif et d'esprit d'entreprise cooperatif sont fondamentales. La facon dont on definit d'habitude les systemes et, a leur tour, les reseaux est en fonction du volume et des caracteristiques des liens qui les unissent. Par la suite, puisant dans une enquete recente aupres des petites entreprises situees en Ecosse et dans le nord d'Angleterre (dont 1347 reponses), cet article cherche a esquisser l'importance de la constitution de reseaux d'innovation par les petites entreprises et a comprendre la contribution unique de tels reseaux a l'introduction reussie des produits et des procedes nouveaux. D'une maniere importante, on peut examiner l'impact de la constitution de reseaux sur l'innovation dans l'industrie et les services. A cette fin, l'article note les liens positifs entre la reussite de l'innovation de produits et la cooperation avec la clientele et le secteur public, et entre la reussite de l'innovation des procedes et la cooperation avec les fournisseurs et les universites. On note aussi, avec prudence, le nombre eleve d'innovateurs 'reussis' qui n'ont pas coopere pour innover. Innovation, Petites entreprises, Cooperation, Industrie, Services. Freel M. S. und Harrison R. T. (2006) Innovation und Zusammenarbeit im Kleinfirmensektor: Beweise aus 'Nordbritannien', Regional Studies 40, 289-305. Wahrend der letzten zwanzig Jahre haben Netzwerk gestutzte Modelle der Wirtschaftsentwicklung, bei denen Innovation eine fuhrende Rolle spielte, bei Politikern bei auch wie Akademikern an Beliebtheit zugenommen. Im Gegensatz zu fruheren, linearen Auffassungen wird Innovation als eine systemische Erscheinung angesehen, in der interaktives Lernen und eine zusammenarbeitende Unternehmerschaft von grundlegender Bedeutung ist. Systeme und ihnen entsprechende Netzwerke werden gewohnlich nach Volumen und Eigenschaften, die sie miteinander verbinden, definiert. Folglich beschaftigt sich dieser Aufsatz, der sich auf eine vor kurzem vorgelegte Ubersicht kleiner Firmen in Schottland und Nordengland bezieht, (welche 1347 Erwiderungen einbrachte) mit der Kartierung des Ausmasses des innovationsbezogenen Rechnungsverbundes, kleiner Firmen und der Wurdigung des einzigartigen Beitrags, die solche Netzwerke fur die erfolgreiche Einfuhrung neuer Produkte und Vorgange leisten. Es ist von Bedeutung, dass man imstande ist, die Auswirkung der Netzwerke auf Innovation bei der Herstellung wie bei Dienstleistungen zu untersuchen. Zu diesem Zweck stellt der Aufsatz die positiven Verbindungen zwischen Erfolg der Produktionsinnovation und Zusammenarbeit mit Kunden und dem offentlichen Sektor heraus, zwischen Erfolg der Prozessinnovation und Zusammenarbeit von Zulieferern und Universitaten. Die Autoren vermerken auch, mit Vorsicht, den Umfang 'erfolgreicher' Innovatoren, die Zusammenarbeit zwecks Innovation ablehnten. Innovation, Kleine Firmen, Zusammenarbeit bei der Herstellung, Dienstleistungen. Freel M. S. y Harrison R. T. (2006) Innovacion y cooperacion en el sector de pequenas empresas: Los indicios de Gran Bretana del Norte, Regional Studies 40, 289-305. En los ultimos veinte anos, los modelos basados en redes del desarrollo economico dirigido por la innovacion han conseguido cada vez mayor popularidad tanto para sistemas de gobierno como academicos. En comparacion con previas concepciones lineares, la innovacion se considera un fenomeno sistemico en el que el aprendizaje interactivo y una cultura empresarial cooperativa tienen una importancia fundamental. El modo en que normalmente se definen los sistemas y, a su vez, las redes es a traves del volumen y las caracteristicas de los enlaces que las unen. En consecuencia, basandonos en un reciente estudio sobre pequenas empresas en Escocia y el norte de Inglaterra (1347 respuestas), en este articulo representamos la extension de las redes dirigidas a la innovacion de las pequenas empresas y tratamos de entender como contribuyen exclusivamente estas redes a la hora de introducir con exito nuevos productos y procesos. Y los mas importante es que podemos investigar el impacto de las redes en la innovacion tanto en fabricacion como en servicios. Para este fin, hemos notado que existe una asociacion positiva entre el exito de la innovacion de productos y la cooperacion con clientes y el sector publico, y entre el exito de innovacion de los procesos y la cooperacion con proveedores y universidades. Asimismo senalamos, con precaucion, la gran cantidad de innovadores fructiferos que no participaron en la innovacion. Innovacion, Pequenas empresas, Cooperacion, Fabricacion, Servicios.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Freel & Richard Harrison, 2006. "Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector: Evidence from 'Northern Britain'," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 289-305.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:4:p:289-305
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400600725095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400600725095
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400600725095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Kaufmann & Franz Todtling, 2000. "Systems of Innovation in Traditional Industrial Regions: The Case of Styria in a Comparative Perspective," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 29-40.
    2. David J. Teece, 2008. "Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Transfer And Licensing Of Know-How And Intellectual Property Understanding the Multinational Enterprise in the Modern World, chapter 11, pages 265-296, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Mark Freel, 2000. "External linkages and product innovation in small manufacturing firms," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 245-266, July.
    4. Tether, Bruce S., 2002. "Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 947-967, August.
    5. David Angel, 2002. "Inter-firm Collaboration and Technology Development Partnerships Within US Manufacturing Industries," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 333-344.
    6. James Love & Stephen Roper, 1999. "The Determinants of Innovation: R & D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 15(1), pages 43-64, August.
    7. Demsetz, Harold, 1988. "The Theory of the Firm Revisited," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 141-161, Spring.
    8. Lisa De Propris, 2000. "Innovation And Inter-Firm Co-Operation: The Case Of The West Midlands," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(5), pages 421-446.
    9. Martin, Stephen & Scott, John T., 2000. "The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 437-447, April.
    10. Robertson, Paul L. & Langlois, Richard N., 1995. "Innovation, networks, and vertical integration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 543-562, July.
    11. Cohen, Wesley M & Levinthal, Daniel A, 1989. "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(397), pages 569-596, September.
    12. Bougrain, Frederic & Haudeville, Bernard, 2002. "Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 735-747, July.
    13. James Simmie & James Sennett & Peter Wood & Doug Hart, 2002. "Innovation in Europe: A Tale of Networks, Knowledge and Trade in Five Cities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 47-64.
    14. Nooteboom, Bart, 1999. "Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 793-805, November.
    15. Freel, Mark S., 2003. "Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 751-770, May.
    16. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
    17. Mark S Freel, 2002. "On Regional Systems of Innovation: Illustrations from the West Midlands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 20(5), pages 633-654, October.
    18. Love, James H. & Roper, Stephen, 2001. "Location and network effects on innovation success: evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 643-661, April.
    19. Christine Oughton & Geoff Whittam, 1997. "Competition and Cooperation in the Small Firm Sector," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 44(1), pages 1-30, February.
    20. Brusco, Sebastiano, 1982. "The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralisation and Social Integration," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(2), pages 167-184, June.
    21. Huggins, Robert, 2001. "Inter-firm network policies and firm performance: evaluating the impact of initiatives in the United Kingdom," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 443-458, March.
    22. Nooteboom, Bart, 1999. "Innovation, Learning and Industrial Organisation," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 23(2), pages 127-150, March.
    23. Richardson, G B, 1972. "The Organisation of Industry," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(327), pages 883-896, September.
    24. Stephen Roper, 2001. "Innovation, Networks and Plant Location: Some Evidence for Ireland," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 215-228.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Freel, Mark S., 2003. "Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 751-770, May.
    2. Tomlinson, Philip R., 2010. "Co-operative ties and innovation: Some new evidence for UK manufacturing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 762-775, July.
    3. Zahoor, Nadia & Al-Tabbaa, Omar, 2020. "Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(2).
    4. Pascucci, Stefano & Royer, Annie & Bijman, Jos, 2012. "To Make or to Buy: Is this the Question?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca & Boronat-Moll, Carles, 2012. "Process innovation objectives and management complementarities: patterns, drivers, co-adoption and performance effects," MERIT Working Papers 2012-051, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. Coppola, Adele & Pascucci, Stefano, 2007. "The Role of Innovations in the Competitive Strategies of Italian Agri-Food Enterprises," 2007 1st Forum, February 15-17, 2007, Innsbruck, Austria 6584, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    7. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269, August.
    8. Pascucci, Stefano & Royer, Annie & Bijman, Jos, 2011. "Should I Make or Should I Buy? Innovation Strategies and Governance Structures in the Italian Food Sector," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(2), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2003. "Institutional Variety, Networking and Knowledge Exchange: Communication and Innovation in the Case of the Brianza Technological District," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 159-172.
    10. Becker, Wolfgang & Dietz, Jurgen, 2004. "R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms--evidence for the German manufacturing industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 209-223, March.
    11. Justin Doran & Geraldine Ryan & Jane Bourke & Frank Crowley, 2019. "In-House Or Outsourcing Skills: How Best To Manage For Innovation?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(01), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Paola Cardamone & Valeria Pupo, 2015. "R&D Cooperation Between Firms And Universities. Some Evidence In Five European Countries," Working Papers 201501, Università della Calabria, Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica e Finanza "Giovanni Anania" - DESF.
    13. Schmiedeberg, Claudia, 2008. "Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1492-1503, October.
    14. Sunyoung Park, 2019. "Identification of Overall Innovation Behavior by Using a Decision Tree: The Case of a Korean Manufacturer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-54, November.
    15. Mazzanti, Massimiliano & Mancinelli, Susanna, 2007. "SME Performance, Innovation and Networking Evidence on Complementarities for a Local Economic System," Knowledge, Technology, Human Capital Working Papers 9554, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    16. Natalie Holden, 2015. "An exploration of interactive contextual and dispositional factors which influence a collective process of entrepreneurial activity: a novel case at Bristol Zoo," Working Papers 27, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Nov 2015.
    17. J Doran & G Ryan, 2016. "The effectiveness of R&D and external interaction for innovation: Insights from quantile regression," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 21(1), pages 47-65, March.
    18. Hyukjoon Kim & Yongtae Park, 2008. "The impact of R&D collaboration on innovative performance in Korea: A Bayesian network approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 75(3), pages 535-554, June.
    19. Ronde, Patrick & Hussler, Caroline, 2005. "Innovation in regions: What does really matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1150-1172, October.
    20. Tomlinson, Philip R. & Fai, Felicia M., 2013. "The nature of SME co-operation and innovation: A multi-scalar and multi-dimensional analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 316-326.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:4:p:289-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.