IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v59y2016i6p1073-1090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Internet-based public participation GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI) in environmental planning and management

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenghong Tang
  • Tiantian Liu

Abstract

An Internet-based public participation geographic information system (PPGIS) is an affordable and accessible tool for citizens to provide location-based volunteered geographic information (VGI) in environmental planning and management. Based on a conceptual model, this study uses the SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis methodology to qualitatively evaluate user, information, and site use of six cases with Internet-based PPGIS. This study reviews each case's website to collect descriptive data for the case analysis. The results of this study show that user numbers do not have a significantly strong relationship with data submission numbers, since active users had the highest number of contributions. The most urgent task of using Internet-based PPGIS to attract citizen scientists is to invite and retain long-term and active contributors, and to change interested users into long-term active contributors.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenghong Tang & Tiantian Liu, 2016. "Evaluating Internet-based public participation GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI) in environmental planning and management," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(6), pages 1073-1090, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:59:y:2016:i:6:p:1073-1090
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2015.1054477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2015.1054477
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2015.1054477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mordechai Haklay, 2010. "How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(4), pages 682-703, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bram Oosterbroek & Joop de Kraker & Sandra Akkermans & Paola Esser & Pim Martens, 2024. "Participatory Design of Urban Green Spaces to Improve Residents’ Health," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Isabelle Soares & Claudia Yamu & Gerd Weitkamp, 2020. "The Relationship between the Spatial Configuration and the Fourth Sustainable Dimension Creativity in University Campuses: The Case Study of Zernike Campus, Groningen, The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks," SocArXiv q86sd, Center for Open Science.
    2. Yagci Sokat, Kezban & Dolinskaya, Irina S. & Smilowitz, Karen & Bank, Ryan, 2018. "Incomplete information imputation in limited data environments with application to disaster response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 466-485.
    3. Massimiliano Pittore & Marc Wieland & Kevin Fleming, 2017. "Perspectives on global dynamic exposure modelling for geo-risk assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(1), pages 7-30, March.
    4. Katerina Tzavella & Alexander Fekete & Frank Fiedrich, 2018. "Opportunities provided by geographic information systems and volunteered geographic information for a timely emergency response during flood events in Cologne, Germany," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(1), pages 29-57, April.
    5. Geoff Boeing, 2020. "Planarity and street network representation in urban form analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(5), pages 855-869, June.
    6. Duncan Light & Craig Young, 2015. "Toponymy as Commodity: Exploring the Economic Dimensions of Urban Place Names," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 435-450, May.
    7. Zhao, Pengxiang & Jia, Tao & Qin, Kun & Shan, Jie & Jiao, Chenjing, 2015. "Statistical analysis on the evolution of OpenStreetMap road networks in Beijing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 420(C), pages 59-72.
    8. Nikolaos Papapesios & Claire Ellul & Amanda Shakir & Glen Hart, 2019. "Exploring the use of crowdsourced geographic information in defence: challenges and opportunities," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 133-160, March.
    9. Mikko Rönneberg & Mari Laakso & Tapani Sarjakoski, 2019. "Map Gretel: social map service supporting a national mapping agency in data collection," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 43-59, March.
    10. Heidrun Zeug & Gunter Zeug & Conrad Bielski & Gloria Solano-Hermosilla & Robert M’barek, 2017. "Innovative Food Price Collection in Developing Countries. Focus on Crowdsourcing in Africa," JRC Research Reports JRC103294, Joint Research Centre.
    11. Votsis, Athanasios, 2017. "Planning for green infrastructure: The spatial effects of parks, forests, and fields on Helsinki's apartment prices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 279-289.
    12. Ding, Rui & Ujang, Norsidah & Hamid, Hussain bin & Manan, Mohd Shahrudin Abd & He, Yuou & Li, Rong & Wu, Jianjun, 2018. "Detecting the urban traffic network structure dynamics through the growth and analysis of multi-layer networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 800-817.
    13. Shiwei Lu & Shih-Lung Shaw & Zhixiang Fang & Xirui Zhang & Ling Yin, 2017. "Exploring the Effects of Sampling Locations for Calibrating the Huff Model Using Mobile Phone Location Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Amin Mobasheri & Yeran Sun & Lukas Loos & Ahmed Loai Ali, 2017. "Are Crowdsourced Datasets Suitable for Specialized Routing Services? Case Study of OpenStreetMap for Routing of People with Limited Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Bidur Devkota & Hiroyuki Miyazaki & Apichon Witayangkurn & Sohee Minsun Kim, 2019. "Using Volunteered Geographic Information and Nighttime Light Remote Sensing Data to Identify Tourism Areas of Interest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-29, August.
    16. Mengdi Zhang & Xiao Wang & Zengxiang Zhang & Xiaoli Zhao, 2018. "Assessing the Potential of Rural Settlement Land Consolidation in China: A Method Based on Comprehensive Evaluation of Restricted Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Hae Ok Choi, 2020. "An Evolutionary Approach to Technology Innovation of Cadastre for Smart Land Management Policy," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Pedro Lopes & Luís Almeida & João Pinto & Justino Jesus & Didiana Fernandes & Isabel Vieira & Ricardo Gama, 2019. "Open Tourist Information System: a platform for touristic information management and outreach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 577-593, December.
    19. Roman Lukyanenko & Jeffrey Parsons & Yolanda F. Wiersma, 2014. "The IQ of the Crowd: Understanding and Improving Information Quality in Structured User-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 669-689, December.
    20. K. Graff & C. Lissak & Y. Thiery & O. Maquaire & S. Costa & B. Laignel, 2019. "Analysis and quantification of potential consequences in multirisk coastal context at different spatial scales (Normandy, France)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 637-664, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:59:y:2016:i:6:p:1073-1090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.