IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jgeosy/v21y2019i1d10.1007_s10109-018-0288-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Map Gretel: social map service supporting a national mapping agency in data collection

Author

Listed:
  • Mikko Rönneberg

    (Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI)

  • Mari Laakso

    (Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI)

  • Tapani Sarjakoski

    (Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI)

Abstract

This study presents results from an on-going social map service pilot that supports a national mapping agency (NMA) in data collection. Results from the pilot show that a VGI map service benefits both citizens and the NMA; the data quality is high enough to suit the needs of an NMA; citizens obtain a means to contribute and be involved in ameliorating maps. The social map service works also as a citizen-to-citizen communication channel as all the contributions are immediately visible to all users. Based on the results of this study, VGI should be further integrated with NMA processes in the future. One way of improving the integration are via services offered to both citizens and NMA employees that borrow features from existing social network services but also from popular games. Commenting, voting and gamification elements can be integrated with the VGI services to benefit both citizens and NMAs. Due to the numerous challenges of VGI the European national mapping agencies involvement in using citizens as data collectors is low. It is, however, within the NMA’s grasp to develop the role of VGI in NMA processes further and to make VGI collection fun.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikko Rönneberg & Mari Laakso & Tapani Sarjakoski, 2019. "Map Gretel: social map service supporting a national mapping agency in data collection," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 43-59, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:21:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10109-018-0288-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10109-018-0288-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10109-018-0288-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10109-018-0288-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mordechai Haklay, 2010. "How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(4), pages 682-703, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks," SocArXiv q86sd, Center for Open Science.
    2. Yagci Sokat, Kezban & Dolinskaya, Irina S. & Smilowitz, Karen & Bank, Ryan, 2018. "Incomplete information imputation in limited data environments with application to disaster response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 466-485.
    3. Amin Mobasheri & Yeran Sun & Lukas Loos & Ahmed Loai Ali, 2017. "Are Crowdsourced Datasets Suitable for Specialized Routing Services? Case Study of OpenStreetMap for Routing of People with Limited Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Geoff Boeing, 2020. "Planarity and street network representation in urban form analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(5), pages 855-869, June.
    5. Zhenghong Tang & Tiantian Liu, 2016. "Evaluating Internet-based public participation GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI) in environmental planning and management," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(6), pages 1073-1090, June.
    6. Bidur Devkota & Hiroyuki Miyazaki & Apichon Witayangkurn & Sohee Minsun Kim, 2019. "Using Volunteered Geographic Information and Nighttime Light Remote Sensing Data to Identify Tourism Areas of Interest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Mengdi Zhang & Xiao Wang & Zengxiang Zhang & Xiaoli Zhao, 2018. "Assessing the Potential of Rural Settlement Land Consolidation in China: A Method Based on Comprehensive Evaluation of Restricted Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Massimiliano Pittore & Marc Wieland & Kevin Fleming, 2017. "Perspectives on global dynamic exposure modelling for geo-risk assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(1), pages 7-30, March.
    9. Katerina Tzavella & Alexander Fekete & Frank Fiedrich, 2018. "Opportunities provided by geographic information systems and volunteered geographic information for a timely emergency response during flood events in Cologne, Germany," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(1), pages 29-57, April.
    10. Duncan Light & Craig Young, 2015. "Toponymy as Commodity: Exploring the Economic Dimensions of Urban Place Names," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 435-450, May.
    11. Zhao, Pengxiang & Jia, Tao & Qin, Kun & Shan, Jie & Jiao, Chenjing, 2015. "Statistical analysis on the evolution of OpenStreetMap road networks in Beijing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 420(C), pages 59-72.
    12. Hae Ok Choi, 2020. "An Evolutionary Approach to Technology Innovation of Cadastre for Smart Land Management Policy," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Nikolaos Papapesios & Claire Ellul & Amanda Shakir & Glen Hart, 2019. "Exploring the use of crowdsourced geographic information in defence: challenges and opportunities," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 133-160, March.
    14. Pedro Lopes & Luís Almeida & João Pinto & Justino Jesus & Didiana Fernandes & Isabel Vieira & Ricardo Gama, 2019. "Open Tourist Information System: a platform for touristic information management and outreach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 577-593, December.
    15. Roman Lukyanenko & Jeffrey Parsons & Yolanda F. Wiersma, 2014. "The IQ of the Crowd: Understanding and Improving Information Quality in Structured User-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 669-689, December.
    16. K. Graff & C. Lissak & Y. Thiery & O. Maquaire & S. Costa & B. Laignel, 2019. "Analysis and quantification of potential consequences in multirisk coastal context at different spatial scales (Normandy, France)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 637-664, November.
    17. Heidrun Zeug & Gunter Zeug & Conrad Bielski & Gloria Solano-Hermosilla & Robert M’barek, 2017. "Innovative Food Price Collection in Developing Countries. Focus on Crowdsourcing in Africa," JRC Research Reports JRC103294, Joint Research Centre.
    18. Boeing, Geoff, 2019. "Street Network Models and Measures for Every U.S. City, County, Urbanized Area, Census Tract, and Zillow-Defined Neighborhood," SocArXiv 7fxjz, Center for Open Science.
    19. Justin Berli & Mattia Bunel & César Ducruet, 2018. "Sea-Land Interdependence in the Global Maritime Network: the Case of Australian Port Cities," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 447-471, September.
    20. Votsis, Athanasios, 2017. "Planning for green infrastructure: The spatial effects of parks, forests, and fields on Helsinki's apartment prices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 279-289.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:21:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10109-018-0288-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.