IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v38y2011i6p1133-1149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing stochastic orders in tails of contingency tables

Author

Listed:
  • Chi Tim Ng
  • Johan Lim
  • Kyu S. Hahn

Abstract

Testing for the difference in the strength of bivariate association in two independent contingency tables is an important issue that finds applications in various disciplines. Currently, many of the commonly used tests are based on single-index measures of association. More specifically, one obtains single-index measurements of association from two tables and compares them based on asymptotic theory. Although they are usually easy to understand and use, often much of the information contained in the data is lost with single-index measures. Accordingly, they fail to fully capture the association in the data. To remedy this shortcoming, we introduce a new summary statistic measuring various types of association in a contingency table. Based on this new summary statistic, we propose a likelihood ratio test comparing the strength of association in two independent contingency tables. The proposed test examines the stochastic order between summary statistics. We derive its asymptotic null distribution and demonstrate that the least favorable distributions are chi-bar distributions. We numerically compare the power of the proposed test to that of the tests based on single-index measures. Finally, we provide two examples illustrating the new summary statistics and the related tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi Tim Ng & Johan Lim & Kyu S. Hahn, 2011. "Testing stochastic orders in tails of contingency tables," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 1133-1149, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:38:y:2011:i:6:p:1133-1149
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2010.484487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2010.484487
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2010.484487?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blaug, Mark, 1985. "Where are we now in the economics of education?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 17-28, February.
    2. Ivy Liu & Alan Agresti, 2005. "The analysis of ordered categorical data: An overview and a survey of recent developments," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 14(1), pages 1-73, June.
    3. Bartolucci, F. & Scaccia, L., 2004. "Testing for positive association in contingency tables with fixed margins," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 195-210, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeremy E. Reynolds, 2014. "Prevailing Preferences," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 67(3), pages 1017-1041, July.
    2. Kouji Tahata & Takuya Yoshimoto, 2015. "Marginal asymmetry model for square contingency tables with ordered categories," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 371-379, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claude DIEBOLT & Jamel TRABELSI, 2009. "Human Capital and French Macroeconomic Growth in the Long Run," Economies et Sociétés (Serie 'Histoire Economique Quantitative'), Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), issue 40, pages 901-917, May.
    2. Baruch, Shmuel & Panayides, Marios & Venkataraman, Kumar, 2017. "Informed trading and price discovery before corporate events," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 561-588.
    3. Bambio, Yiriyibin & Bouayad Agha, Salima, 2018. "Land tenure security and investment: Does strength of land right really matter in rural Burkina Faso?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 130-147.
    4. Wei, Zheng & Kim, Daeyoung, 2021. "On exploratory analytic method for multi-way contingency tables with an ordinal response variable and categorical explanatory variables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    5. Rasheed A. Adeyemi & Temesgen Zewotir & Shaun Ramroop, 2016. "Semiparametric Multinomial Ordinal Model to Analyze Spatial Patterns of Child Birth Weight in Nigeria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, November.
    6. M. Pardo, 2011. "Testing equality restrictions in generalized linear models for multinomial data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 231-253, March.
    7. Jean-Luc Demeulemeester & Claude Diebolt, 2011. "Education and Growth: What Links for Which Policy?," Historical Social Research (Section 'Cliometrics'), Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 36(4), pages 323-346.
    8. Keunbaik Lee & Michael J. Daniels, 2007. "A Class of Markov Models for Longitudinal Ordinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1060-1067, December.
    9. Högberg, Hans & Svensson, Elisabeth, 2008. "An Overview of Methods in the Analysis of Dependent ordered catagorical Data: Assumptions and Implications," Working Papers 2008:7, Örebro University, School of Business.
    10. Maynou, Laia & Cairns, John, 2019. "What is driving HTA decision-making? Evidence from cancer drug reimbursement decisions from 6 European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 130-139.
    11. Pardo, L. & Pardo, M.C., 2008. "An extension of likelihood-ratio-test for testing linear hypotheses in the baseline-category logit model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1477-1489, January.
    12. Maynou, Laia & Cairns, John, 2018. "What is driving HTA decision-making? Evidence from cancer drug reimbursement decisions from 6 European countries," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90877, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Nicholas Barr, 2008. "Education : Lessons from Economic Theory and Operational Experience," EABER Working Papers 21942, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    14. Xavier Bartoll & Joan Gil & Raul Ramos, 2018. "“Has the economic crisis worsened the work-related stress and mental health of temporary workers in Spain?”," AQR Working Papers 201808, University of Barcelona, Regional Quantitative Analysis Group, revised Oct 2018.
    15. Kędra, Arleta & Maleszyk, Piotr & Visvizi, Anna, 2023. "Engaging citizens in land use policy in the smart city context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    16. Tatjana Miljkovic & Daniel Fernández, 2018. "On Two Mixture-Based Clustering Approaches Used in Modeling an Insurance Portfolio," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Ivy Liu & Daniel Fernández, 2020. "Discussion on “Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer‐Lemeshow test” by Giovanni Nattino, Michael L. Pennell, and Stanley Lemeshow," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 564-568, June.
    18. Alan Agresti, 2014. "Two Bayesian/frequentist challenges for categorical data analyses," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 72(2), pages 125-132, August.
    19. Canyon Bosler & Mary C. Daly & John G. Fernald & Bart Hobijn, 2017. "The Outlook for US Labor-Quality Growth," NBER Chapters, in: Education, Skills, and Technical Change: Implications for Future US GDP Growth, pages 61-110, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Manuela Cazzaro & Roberto Colombi, 2006. "Maximum Likelihood Inference for Log-linear Models Subject to Constraints of Double Monotone Dependence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 15(2), pages 177-190, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:38:y:2011:i:6:p:1133-1149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.