IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v25y1998i5p671-683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing for multivariate normality via univariate tests: A case study using lead isotope ratio data

Author

Listed:
  • M. J. Baxter
  • N. H. Gale

Abstract

Samples from ore bodies, mined for copper in antiquity, can be characterized by measurements on three lead isotope ratios. Given sufficient samples, it is possible to estimate the lead isotope field-a three-dimensional construct-that characterizes the ore body. For the purposes of estimating the extent of a field, or assessing whether bronze artefacts could have been made using copper from a particular field, it is often assumed that fields have a trivariate normal distribution. Using recently published data, for which the sample sizes are larger than usual, this paper casts doubt on this assumption. A variety of tests of univariate normality are applied, both to the original lead isotope ratios and to transformations of them based on principal component analysis; the paper can be read as a case study in the use of tests of univariate normality for assessing multivariate normality. This is not an optimal approach, but is sufficient in the cases considered to suggest that fields are, in fact, 'non-normal'. A direct test of multivariate normality confirms this. Some implications for the use of lead isotope ratio data in archaeology are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • M. J. Baxter & N. H. Gale, 1998. "Testing for multivariate normality via univariate tests: A case study using lead isotope ratio data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 671-683, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:25:y:1998:i:5:p:671-683
    DOI: 10.1080/02664769822891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664769822891
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664769822891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. P. Royston, 1983. "Some Techniques for Assessing Multivarate Normality Based on the Shapiro‐Wilk W," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 32(2), pages 121-133, June.
    2. J. P. Royston, 1982. "An Extension of Shapiro and Wilk's W Test for Normality to Large Samples," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 31(2), pages 115-124, June.
    3. Romeu, J. L. & Ozturk, A., 1993. "A Comparative Study of Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Multivariate Normality," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 309-334, August.
    4. K. V. Mardia, 1975. "Assessment of Multinormality and the Robustness of Hotelling's T2. Test," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 24(2), pages 163-171, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Norbert Henze, 2002. "Invariant tests for multivariate normality: a critical review," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 467-506, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomasz Górecki & Lajos Horváth & Piotr Kokoszka, 2020. "Tests of Normality of Functional Data," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(3), pages 677-697, December.
    2. Tenreiro, Carlos, 2011. "An affine invariant multiple test procedure for assessing multivariate normality," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 1980-1992, May.
    3. Sirao Wang & Jiajuan Liang & Min Zhou & Huajun Ye, 2022. "Testing Multivariate Normality Based on F -Representative Points," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Schott, James R., 2002. "Testing for elliptical symmetry in covariance-matrix-based analyses," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 395-404, December.
    5. Fred Huffer & Cheolyong Park, 2000. "A test for multivariate structure," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 633-650.
    6. Lauren Bin Dong & David E. A. Giles, 2004. "An Empirical Likelihood Ratio Test for Normality," Econometrics Working Papers 0401, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    7. Richard Goldstein, 1992. "Test for General Specification Error in Linear Regression," Stata Technical Bulletin, StataCorp LP, vol. 1(2).
    8. Loperfido, Nicola, 2020. "Some remarks on Koziol’s kurtosis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    9. Manuelita Ureta, 1992. "Data Calculator," Stata Technical Bulletin, StataCorp LP, vol. 1(2).
    10. Phil Lignier & Diane Jarvis & Daniel Grainger & Taha Chaiechi, 2024. "Spatial Heterogeneity and Subjective Wellbeing: Exploring the Role of Social Capital in Metropolitan Areas Using Multilevel Modelling," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Dimitrios Thomakos & Johannes Klepsch & Dimitris N. Politis, 2020. "Model Free Inference on Multivariate Time Series with Conditional Correlations," Stats, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-26, November.
    12. Lawrence C. Hamilton, 1992. "How Robust is Robust Regression?," Stata Technical Bulletin, StataCorp LP, vol. 1(2).
    13. Amir Abolhassani & Gale Boyd & Majid Jaridi & Bhaskaran Gopalakrishnan & James Harner, 2023. "“Is Energy That Different from Labor?” Similarity in Determinants of Intensity for Auto Assembly Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-35, February.
    14. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Bin, 2018. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions in China's agriculture sector: A quantile regression," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 15-27.
    15. Ted Anagnoson, 1992. "Why is the Cubic Spline So-Called?," Stata Technical Bulletin, StataCorp LP, vol. 1(2).
    16. Norbert Henze & Celeste Mayer, 2020. "More good news on the HKM test for multivariate reflected symmetry about an unknown centre," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(3), pages 741-770, June.
    17. Naito, Kanta, 1998. "Approximation of the Power of Kurtosis Test for Multinormality," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 166-180, May.
    18. Wanfang Chen & Marc G. Genton, 2023. "Are You All Normal? It Depends!," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(1), pages 114-139, April.
    19. Hailu, Getu & Weersink, Alfons & Minten, Bart, 2018. "Farming practices and productivity," IFPRI book chapters, in: The economics of teff: Exploring Ethiopia’s biggest cash crop, chapter 9, pages 205-235, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Renske E. Kuijpers & Ingmar Visser & Dylan Molenaar, 2021. "Testing the Within-State Distribution in Mixture Models for Responses and Response Times," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(3), pages 348-373, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:25:y:1998:i:5:p:671-683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.