IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fosoec/v37y2008i2p147-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the Relevance of International Trade Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Lutz

Abstract

Probably one of the most controversial contributions to the literature of international trade theory was offered by the late social economist John Culbertson. In his view, low wage competition among corporations in a world characterized by capital mobility and massive trade deficits undermines the foundation trade theory based on David Ricardo’s celebrated notion of comparative advantage. Instead, there are several good reasons to believe that international trade with China, India, Vietnam, etc. will be governed by absolute advantage. The current essay is dedicated to the virtually ignored work of Culbertson, and it is meant as an invitation for social economists to critically evaluate the argument and in the process make an attempt to point out where it goes wrong.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Lutz, 2008. "Revisiting the Relevance of International Trade Theory," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 147-164, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:37:y:2008:i:2:p:147-164
    DOI: 10.1007/s12143-007-9008-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s12143-007-9008-z
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12143-007-9008-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Pressman, 2001. "The Challenge of Social Economics: A Review Essay," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 109-114.
    2. Alan V Deardorff, 2011. "How Robust is Comparative Advantage?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Robert M Stern (ed.), Comparative Advantage, Growth, And The Gains From Trade And Globalization A Festschrift in Honor of Alan V Deardorff, chapter 17, pages 183-195, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Robert Went, 2000. "Game, Set, and Match for Mr. Ricardo? The Surprising Comeback of Protectionism in the Era of Globalizing Free Trade," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 655-677, September.
    4. Donald J. Boudreaux, 2004. "Does Increased International Mobility of Factors of Production Weaken the Case for Free Trade?," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 23(3), pages 373-379, Winter.
    5. Daniel Fusfeld, 2001. "Review Essay on Economics for the Common Good," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 93-101.
    6. Roy J. Ruffin, 2002. "David Ricardo's Discovery of Comparative Advantage," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 727-748, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Lutz, 2008. "Revisiting the Relevance of International Trade Theory," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 147-164, August.
    2. Wignaraja, Ganeshan, 2008. "FDI and Innovation as Drivers of Export Behaviour: Firm-level Evidence from East Asia," MERIT Working Papers 2008-061, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    3. Dariusz Kotlewski, 2022. "Przesłanki za wykorzystaniem rachunkowości wzrostu gospodarczego w badaniu specjalizacji regionalnych," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 2, pages 235-258.
    4. Parrinello, Sergio, 2022. "On Some “New” Interpretations of Ricardo’s Principle of Comparative Advantages," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP60, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    5. Deng, Kent & Shen, Jim Huangnan & Guo, Jingyuan, 2022. "Performance and mechanisms of the Maoist economy: a holistic approach, 1950-1980," Economic History Working Papers 116401, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    6. Henry Thompson, 2023. "Multilateral Comparative Advantage," Auburn Economics Working Paper Series auwp2023-07, Department of Economics, Auburn University.
    7. Maneschi, Andrea, 2004. "The true meaning of David Ricardo's four magic numbers," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 433-443, March.
    8. Warziniack, Travis W. & Finnoff, David & Shogren, Jason F., 2013. "Public economics of hitchhiking species and tourism-based risk to ecosystem services," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 277-294.
    9. Hasan Halife, 2022. "Competitiveness Analysis of Textile Industry of Turkey: Revealed Comparative Advantage Approach," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 25-30, December.
    10. Jorge Morales Meoqui, 2011. "Comparative Advantage and the Labor Theory of Value," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 743-763, Winter.
    11. Andrea Maneschi, 2008. "How Would David Ricardo Have Taught the Principle of Comparative Advantage?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 74(4), pages 1167-1176, April.
    12. Dogaru, Vasile, 2005. "The general validity of comparative advantage in trade exchanges," MPRA Paper 6882, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Kiatkajon CHAIRAT & Sumalee SANTIPOLLAVUT & Supachart SUKHAROMANA, 2015. "Provincial Clustering in the Southern of Thailand : Concept and Empirical," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 15(1), pages 161-172.
    14. Gabriel Felbermayr & Benjamin Jung & Wilhelm Kohler & Philipp Harms & Jakob Schwab, 2017. "Ricardo – gestern und heute," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(09), pages 03-18, May.
    15. Costinot, Arnaud & Komunjer, Ivana, 2006. "What Good Do Countries Trade? New Ricardian Predictions," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt9t9818ng, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    16. Morales Meoqui, Jorge, 2012. "On the distribution of authorship-merits for the comparative-advantage proposition," MPRA Paper 35905, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Reinhard Schumacher, 2013. "Deconstructing the Theory of Comparative Advantage," World Economic Review, World Economics Association, vol. 2013(2), pages 1-83, February.
    18. Heitor Pellegrina & Sebastian Sotelo, 2019. "Migration, Specialization and Trade: Evidence from the Brazilian March to the West," 2019 Meeting Papers 863, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    19. Dvoskin, Ariel & Ianni, Guido, 2021. "Produced means of production and the chain of comparative advantages," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 635-647.
    20. Flavia G. Poinsot, 2019. "David Ricardo vs. Gottfried Haberler: When an Austrian mind matches an English classic mind," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4190, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:37:y:2008:i:2:p:147-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.