IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijogbc/v17y2022i1d10.1007_s42943-022-00062-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitiveness Analysis of Textile Industry of Turkey: Revealed Comparative Advantage Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hasan Halife

    (Damascus University
    Akdeniz University)

Abstract

The study aimed to analyze and evaluate the competitiveness of the Turkish textile industry, using the revealed comparative advantage approach, to identify the opportunities and threats that the textile industry faces in global markets. The paper compared the major countries in the textile industry, such as India, China, Vietnam, Turkey, and the United States during the 2010–2019 time series, using Balassa’s “revealed comparative advantage” (RCA) approach. The findings revealed that the amount of exports is insufficient for determining an industry’s competitiveness; in the instance of Turkish textile products, the RCA value is greater than 1, indicating that the country has a comparative advantage. As a consequence of the comparison, Turkey came in third place, after Pakistan and Vietnam, and ahead of the United States, China, Hong Kong, India, and South Korea, with RCA values ranging from 1 to 1.3 between 2010 and 2019, indicating a positive trend in the industry's competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasan Halife, 2022. "Competitiveness Analysis of Textile Industry of Turkey: Revealed Comparative Advantage Approach," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 25-30, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijogbc:v:17:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s42943-022-00062-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s42943-022-00062-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42943-022-00062-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42943-022-00062-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khurram Shahzad, 2015. "An RCA Analysis of Textiles and Clothing in Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 157-168, Jan-June.
    2. repec:lje:journl:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:157-168 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Brian D. Varian, 2016. "The revealed comparative advantages of late-Victorian Britain," Working Papers 0097, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
    4. Hasan Halife & Malek Alshukur, 2022. "Impact of revenue-sharing contracts on improving profits for manufacturers and suppliers in the supply chain of organic textile products," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 69-88.
    5. Roy J. Ruffin, 2002. "David Ricardo's Discovery of Comparative Advantage," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 727-748, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dariusz Kotlewski, 2022. "Przesłanki za wykorzystaniem rachunkowości wzrostu gospodarczego w badaniu specjalizacji regionalnych," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 2, pages 235-258.
    2. Parrinello, Sergio, 2022. "On Some “New” Interpretations of Ricardo’s Principle of Comparative Advantages," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP60, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    3. Deng, Kent & Shen, Jim Huangnan & Guo, Jingyuan, 2022. "Performance and mechanisms of the Maoist economy: a holistic approach, 1950-1980," Economic History Working Papers 116401, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    4. Henry Thompson, 2023. "Multilateral Comparative Advantage," Auburn Economics Working Paper Series auwp2023-07, Department of Economics, Auburn University.
    5. Maneschi, Andrea, 2004. "The true meaning of David Ricardo's four magic numbers," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 433-443, March.
    6. Jorge Morales Meoqui, 2011. "Comparative Advantage and the Labor Theory of Value," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 743-763, Winter.
    7. Andrea Maneschi, 2008. "How Would David Ricardo Have Taught the Principle of Comparative Advantage?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 74(4), pages 1167-1176, April.
    8. Kiatkajon CHAIRAT & Sumalee SANTIPOLLAVUT & Supachart SUKHAROMANA, 2015. "Provincial Clustering in the Southern of Thailand : Concept and Empirical," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 15(1), pages 161-172.
    9. Nith, Kosal, 2019. "Cambodian place in the International trade of Textile and Clothing: Threat and Opportunity," MPRA Paper 94378, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Gabriel Felbermayr & Benjamin Jung & Wilhelm Kohler & Philipp Harms & Jakob Schwab, 2017. "Ricardo – gestern und heute," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(09), pages 03-18, May.
    11. Giacomo Domini, 2019. "Patterns of specialisation and economic complexity through the lens of universal exhibitions, 1855-1900," LEM Papers Series 2019/20, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    12. Deng, Kent & Shen, Jim Huangnan & Guo, Jingyuan, 2022. "Performance and mechanisms of the Maoist economy: a holistic approach, 1950-1980," Economic History Working Papers 116401, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    13. Morales Meoqui, Jorge, 2012. "On the distribution of authorship-merits for the comparative-advantage proposition," MPRA Paper 35905, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Reinhard Schumacher, 2013. "Deconstructing the Theory of Comparative Advantage," World Economic Review, World Economics Association, vol. 2013(2), pages 1-83, February.
    15. Flavia G. Poinsot, 2019. "David Ricardo vs. Gottfried Haberler: When an Austrian mind matches an English classic mind," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4190, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    16. Daniel M. Bernhofen, 2007. "On the Magic Behind David Ricardo's Four Mystical Numbers," Discussion Papers 07/02, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    17. repec:kob:wpaper:1630 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Morales Meoqui, Jorge & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "Overcoming Absolute And Comparative Advantage: A Reappraisal Of The Relative Cheapness Of Foreign Commodities As The Basis Of International Trade," OSF Preprints u6esg, Center for Open Science.
    19. M. Shahid Alam, 2016. "Commodities in Economics: Loving or Hating Complexity," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 5(1), pages 1-1, March.
    20. Martin Grančay & Nóra Szikorová, 2012. "David Ricardo, Robert Torrens a autorstvo princípu komparatívnych výhod [David Ricardo, Robert Torrens and the Origins of the Principle of Comparative Advantage]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(3), pages 380-394.
    21. Morales Meoqui, Jorge, 2023. "The Demystification Of David Ricardo’S Famous Four Numbers," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 447-466, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijogbc:v:17:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s42943-022-00062-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.