IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v11y2004i1p79-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An example of untranslatability: the conceptual structures of Marshall's and Keynes' conceptions of investment

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Angel Duran
  • Manuel Montalvo

Abstract

This essay discusses the following two hypotheses. The first one is based on the epistemological proposal which we have named the principle of discontinuity. It asserts that certain developments in the history of economic thought involve theoretical breaks which can only be fully explained by making use of the concept of discontinuity. The second hypothesis concerns one of the consequences drawn from the principle of discontinuity, namely, the untranslatability of concepts. Besides other theories to which reference is made by way of examples of specific conclusions regarding the principle of discontinuity, the conceptual structures of Marshall's and Keynes' conceptions of the determinants of investment are analysed and compared with the aim of illustrating the aforementioned hypotheses.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Angel Duran & Manuel Montalvo, 2004. "An example of untranslatability: the conceptual structures of Marshall's and Keynes' conceptions of investment," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 79-106.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:11:y:2004:i:1:p:79-106
    DOI: 10.1080/0967256032000171515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0967256032000171515
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0967256032000171515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John B. Davis & D. W. Hands & Uskali Mäki (ed.), 1998. "The Handbook of Economic Methodology," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 741.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yefimov, Vladimir, 2009. "Comparative historical institutional analysis of German, English and American economics," MPRA Paper 48173, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler, 2011. "Economic Models as Analogies," PIER Working Paper Archive 12-001, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    3. repec:mje:mjejnl:v:12:y:2017:i:2:p:25-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler, 2014. "A Model of Modeling," PIER Working Paper Archive 14-026, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    5. N. Emrah Aydinonat, 2000. "Invisible Hand Explanations: the Case of Menger's Explanation of the 'Origin of Money'," Method and Hist of Econ Thought 0004001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Morten Søberg, 2002. "The Duhem-Quine thesis and experimental economics. A reinterpretation," Discussion Papers 329, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    7. John Hart, 2001. "A conversation with Terence Hutchison," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 359-377.
    8. Jérôme Lallement & Amanar Akhabbar, 2011. "Appliquer la théorie économique de l'équilibre général : de Walras à Leontief," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00609684, HAL.
    9. Dorian Jullien, 2018. "Under Risk, Over Time, Regarding Other People: Language and Rationality within Three Dimensions," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Including a Symposium on Latin American Monetary Thought: Two Centuries in Search of Originality, volume 36, pages 119-155, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    10. Sheila C. Dow, 1999. "Post Keynesianism and Critical Realism: What Is the Connection?," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 15-33, September.
    11. Vladiir Yefimov, 2015. "Two Disputes Of Methods, Three Constructivisms, And Three Liberalisms. Part I," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 29-38.
    12. Yefimov, V. M., 2015. "Two Disputes of Methods Three Constructivisms and Three Liberalisms. Part I," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 1(1), pages 24-33.
    13. Jennifer Dirmeyer, 2010. "The Power of Ideas: The "Peter Boettke" Strategy for Advancing the Science of Prosperity," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 26(Fall 2010), pages 117-124.
    14. Christopher L. Gilbert & Duo Qin, 2005. "The First Fifty Years of Modern Econometrics," Working Papers 544, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    15. Francesco Guala & Andrea Salanti, 2002. "Model-robustness in ‘old’ and ‘new’ growth theory," Working Papers (-2012) 0201, University of Bergamo, Department of Economics.
    16. Łukasz Hard, 2014. "Models of Mechanisms and their Role in Building Economic Explanations," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 37.
    17. Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 2003. "The microfoundations of macroeconomics: an evolutionary perspective," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 27(1), pages 65-84, January.
    18. Silvestri, Paolo, 2015. "Disputed (Disciplinary) Boundaries. Philosophy, Economics, Value Judgments," CESMEP Working Papers 201504, University of Turin.
    19. repec:avg:wpaper:en7743 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Fabio Cerina, 2009. "Marshall'S Ceteris Paribus In A Dynamic Framework," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 24-53, February.
    21. Julie Nelson, 2002. "Economic methodology and feminist critiques," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 93-97.
    22. McGuirk, Anya M. & Spanos, Aris, 2002. "The Linear Regression Model With Autocorrelated Errors: Just Say No To Error Autocorrelation," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19905, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:11:y:2004:i:1:p:79-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.