IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v32y2014i1-2p70-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Platform use in systems building

Author

Listed:
  • Gustav Jansson
  • Helena Johnsson
  • Dan Engstr�m

Abstract

The practice of reusing processes and technical solutions leads to the formation of product platforms in house building. Product platforms originate from industries employing a make-to-order production strategy, e.g. the automotive industry. To test how the product platform concept is useful in engineer-to-order production strategies, a case study at two Swedish house-builders was made. Key factors that affect platform use in systems buildings were sought. The smaller company operates a supplier-led platform focusing on commonalities in process knowledge. There is less definition of the product itself to allow for distinctiveness in the product offer. The larger company has a decentralized business and operates a client-driven platform with fragmented standardization. Focus is put on creating commonality through defining the product and handling distinctiveness through an iterative design procedure. Product families were not in use at the case study companies. The companies transform standardized platform solutions into project uniqueness by using support methods. Four platform support methods emerged from the case studies: design planning, collaborative design, design optimization, and requirements iteration. The balance between commonality and distinctiveness in the platform is important to attend to in each house-building project. The engineer-to-order production strategy hinders the implementation of a fully parameterized platform. The product platform concept is therefore expanded with support methods to handle distinctiveness, i.e. project uniqueness. The product platform assets: components, processes, relationships and knowledge, are present also in platforms used in systems building.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustav Jansson & Helena Johnsson & Dan Engstr�m, 2014. "Platform use in systems building," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 70-82, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:32:y:2014:i:1-2:p:70-82
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2013.793376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2013.793376
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2013.793376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2009. "Engineer-to-order supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 741-754, December.
    2. Helena Johnsson & John Henrik Meiling, 2009. "Defects in offsite construction: timber module prefabrication," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(7), pages 667-681.
    3. Bertrand, J. W. M. & Muntslag, D. R., 1993. "Production control in engineer-to-order firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 3-22, July.
    4. Rajat Roy & Margaret Low & John Waller, 2005. "Documentation, standardization and improvement of the construction process in house building," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 57-67.
    5. Stuart Green & Scott Fernie & Stephanie Weller, 2005. "Making sense of supply chain management: a comparative study of aerospace and construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 579-593.
    6. Alexander Styhre & Pernilla Gluch, 2010. "Managing knowledge in platforms: boundary objects and stocks and flows of knowledge," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 589-599.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fernanda Saidelles Bataglin & Daniela Dietz Viana & Carlos Torres Formoso, 2022. "Design Principles and Prescriptions for Planning and Controlling Engineer-to-Order Industrialized Building Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Petri Uusitalo & Rita Lavikka, 2021. "Technology transfer in the construction industry," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1291-1320, October.
    3. Daniela D. Viana & Iris D. Tommelein & Carlos T. Formoso, 2017. "Using Modularity to Reduce Complexity of Industrialized Building Systems for Mass Customization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Cannas, Violetta G. & Gosling, Jonathan & Pero, Margherita & Rossi, Tommaso, 2019. "Engineering and production decoupling configurations: An empirical study in the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 173-189.
    5. Cannas, Violetta Giada & Gosling, Jonathan, 2021. "A decade of engineering-to-order (2010–2020): Progress and emerging themes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandrin, Enrico & Trentin, Alessio & Forza, Cipriano, 2018. "Leveraging high-involvement practices to develop mass customization capability: A contingent configurational perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 335-345.
    2. Daniela D. Viana & Iris D. Tommelein & Carlos T. Formoso, 2017. "Using Modularity to Reduce Complexity of Industrialized Building Systems for Mass Customization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. R. Micale & C. M. La Fata & M. Enea & G. La Scalia, 2021. "Regenerative scheduling problem in engineer to order manufacturing: an economic assessment," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1913-1925, October.
    4. Carvalho, Andréa Nunes & Oliveira, Fabricio & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe, 2015. "Tactical capacity planning in a real-world ETO industry case: An action research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 187-203.
    5. Telles, Eduardo Santos & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco & Morandi, Maria Isabel Wolf Motta & Piran, Fabio Antonio Sartori, 2020. "Drum-buffer-rope in an engineering-to-order system: An analysis of an aerospace manufacturer using data envelopment analysis (DEA)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    6. Pero, Margherita & Stößlein, Martin & Cigolini, Roberto, 2015. "Linking product modularity to supply chain integration in the construction and shipbuilding industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 602-615.
    7. Hosang Hyun & Hyung-Geun Kim & Jin-Sung Kim, 2022. "Integrated Off-Site Construction Design Process including DfMA Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Neumann, Anas & Hajji, Adnene & Rekik, Monia & Pellerin, Robert, 2022. "A model for advanced planning systems dedicated to the Engineer-To-Order context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    9. Sung, Chang Sup & Juhn, Jaeho, 2009. "Makespan minimization for a 2-stage assembly scheduling problem subject to component available time constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 392-401, June.
    10. Antiopi Koronaki & Aurimas Bukauskas & Aftab Jalia & Darshil U. Shah & Michael H. Ramage, 2021. "Prefabricated Engineered Timber Schools in the United Kingdom: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Cannas, Violetta G. & Gosling, Jonathan & Pero, Margherita & Rossi, Tommaso, 2020. "Determinants for order-fulfilment strategies in engineer-to-order companies: Insights from the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Dekkers, Rob & Chang, C.M. & Kreutzfeldt, Jochen, 2013. "The interface between “product design and engineering” and manufacturing: A review of the literature and empirical evidence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 316-333.
    13. Zhang, Linda L., 2015. "A literature review on multitype platforming and framework for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-12.
    14. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Sustainability of Wood-Based Constructions’ Use from the Perspective of Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Scharmann, Anne, 2024. "Innovation collaboration between family firms and startups: Insights from the German construction industry," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 9(2), pages 1384-1413.
    16. Conrad Boton, 2020. "Remote Teaching of Building Information Modeling During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Anand Gurumurthy & Gunjan Soni & Surya Prakash & Gaurav Kumar Badhotiya, 2013. "Review on Supply Chain Management Research—An Indian Perspective," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Oliveira, Gilson Adamczuk & Tan, Kim Hua & Guedes, Bruno Turmina, 2018. "Lean and green approach: An evaluation tool for new product development focused on small and medium enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 62-73.
    19. Brachmann, Robert & Kolisch, Rainer, 2021. "The impact of flexibility on engineer-to-order production planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    20. Lauri Pulkka & Miro Ristimäki & Karoliina Rajakallio & Seppo Junnila, 2016. "Applicability and benefits of the ecosystem concept in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 129-144, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:32:y:2014:i:1-2:p:70-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.