IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apfiec/v20y2010i22p1751-1760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing efficiency of stock rights issues in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Edil Abd Sukor
  • Obiyathulla Ismath Bacha

Abstract

This article undertakes an empirical examination of pure rights issues in Malaysia. Though pricing efficiency is the main focus, we also examine related issues. We study a total of 38 pure rights issues that occurred over the 8-year period January 1998 to December 2005. Using two alternative valuation models, the adjusted Black-Scholes Call Option Model (BSOPM) and the traditional Implied Rights Valuation Model (IRVM), we find the Malaysian market to be inefficient in pricing the rights. Mispricing is quite extensive with a predominance of overpricing. Significantly, both pricing models, despite their different theoretical underpinnings produce similar results. These results are further validated by the returns to our two arbitrage strategies. The trading strategy, which establishes a net short position in the rights produces substantial positive returns, whereas the strategy which effectively goes long the rights, produced marginally negative returns. We found underlying stock price volatility, liquidity and moneyness of the rights to be the key determinants of the extent of mispricing. Finally, we find that underlying stock price volatility was significantly lower post rights issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Edil Abd Sukor & Obiyathulla Ismath Bacha, 2010. "Pricing efficiency of stock rights issues in Malaysia," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(22), pages 1751-1760.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:20:y:2010:i:22:p:1751-1760
    DOI: 10.1080/09603107.2010.524619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09603107.2010.524619
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09603107.2010.524619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Howard Chan, 1997. "The effect of volatility estimates in the valuation of underwritten rights issues," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(5), pages 473-480.
    2. Bruce Burton & Christine Helliar & David Power, 2004. "The benefits and costs of deeply-discounted rights issues - practitioners viewpoints," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(6), pages 369-372.
    3. B. M. Burton & D. M. Power, 2003. "Evidence on the determinants of equity issue method in the UK," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 145-157.
    4. Jun Cai, 1998. "The long-run performance following Japanese rights issues," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 419-434.
    5. Galai, Dan & Schneller, Meir I, 1978. "Pricing of Warrants and the Value of the Firm," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 33(5), pages 1333-1342, December.
    6. Sian Owen & Jo-Ann Suchard, 2008. "The pricing and impact of rights issues of equity in Australia," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(14), pages 1147-1160.
    7. Poitras, Geoffrey, 2002. "Short sales restrictions, dilution and the pricing of rights issues on the Singapore Stock Exchange," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 141-162, April.
    8. Bae, Sung C & Levy, Haim, 1994. "The Valuation of Stock Purchase Rights as Call Options," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 29(3), pages 419-440, August.
    9. MacBeth, James D & Merville, Larry J, 1979. "An Empirical Examination of the Black-Scholes Call Option Pricing Model," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 34(5), pages 1173-1186, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Poitras, Geoffrey, 2002. "Short sales restrictions, dilution and the pricing of rights issues on the Singapore Stock Exchange," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 141-162, April.
    2. Consuelo Riano & Fco. Javier Ruiz & Rafael Santamaria, 2007. "Determinants of the underpricing of new shares during the subscription period: empirical evidence from the Spanish stock exchange," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7), pages 521-540.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4430 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Veld, C.H., 1991. "Warrant pricing : A review of theoretical and empirical research," Other publications TiSEM ac252bad-d1c0-45d6-832a-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Hun Y. Park & R. Stephen Sears, 1985. "Changing Volatility And The Pricing Of Options On Stock Index Futures," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 8(4), pages 265-274, December.
    6. David C. Leonard & Michael E. Solt, 1990. "On Using The Black-Scholes Model To Value Warrants," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 13(2), pages 81-92, June.
    7. Jurczenko, Emmanuel & Maillet, Bertrand & Negrea, Bogdan, 2002. "Revisited multi-moment approximate option pricing models: a general comparison (Part 1)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24950, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Chavas, Jean-Paul & Li, Jian & Wang, Linjie, 2024. "Option pricing revisited: The role of price volatility and dynamics," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    9. Arturo Bris & William N. Goetzmann & Ning Zhu, 2007. "Efficiency and the Bear: Short Sales and Markets Around the World," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(3), pages 1029-1079, June.
    10. Hatem Mansali, 2009. "La gestion des résultats et les performances comptables à long terme des entreprises françaises émettrices d’actions," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 12(4), pages 39-83, December.
    11. Ncube, Mthuli, 1996. "Modelling implied volatility with OLS and panel data models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 71-84, January.
    12. Ballestra, Luca Vincenzo & Cecere, Liliana, 2016. "A numerical method to estimate the parameters of the CEV model implied by American option prices: Evidence from NYSE," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 100-106.
    13. Bianconi, Marcelo & MacLachlan, Scott & Sammon, Marco, 2015. "Implied volatility and the risk-free rate of return in options markets," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-26.
    14. Michael J. Dueker & Thomas W. Miller, 1996. "Market microstructure effects on the direct measurement of the early exercise premium in exchange-listed options," Working Papers 1996-013, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    15. Anubha Srivastava & Manjula Shastri, 2020. "A Study of Black–Scholes Model’s Applicability in Indian Capital Markets," Paradigm, , vol. 24(1), pages 73-92, June.
    16. Baruník, Jozef & Hlínková, Michaela, 2016. "Revisiting the long memory dynamics of the implied–realized volatility relationship: New evidence from the wavelet regression," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 503-514.
    17. Ozge Sezgin Alp, 2016. "The Performance of Skewness and Kurtosis Adjusted Option Pricing Model in Emerging Markets: A case of Turkish Derivatives Market," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 5(3), pages 70-84, April.
    18. Ander Olvik & Raul Kangro, 2015. "Pricing of Warrants with Stock Price Dependent Threshold Conditions," Papers 1503.05139, arXiv.org.
    19. Asea, Patrick K. & Ncube, Mthuli, 1998. "Heterogeneous information arrival and option pricing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1-2), pages 291-323.
    20. Veld, C.H. & Verboven, A.H.F., 1993. "An empirical analysis of warrant prices versus long term call option prices," Research Memorandum FEW 594, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    21. Jean-Guy Simonato, 2015. "New Warrant Issues Valuation with Leverage and Equity Model Errors," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 247-272, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:20:y:2010:i:22:p:1751-1760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAFE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.