IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v12y2003i2p197-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality in professional accounting education provision in the UK - the CIMA experience

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart McChlery
  • Catriona Paisey

Abstract

The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) introduced its Quality Through Partnership (QTP) scheme in 1994. This scheme was designed to provide a system of monitoring and quality control for colleges providing CIMA tuition. Following a review of colleges by trained assessors, those colleges which had in place quality procedures that met certain minimum threshold standards were approved under the QTP scheme in terms of the quality of their course delivery. The aim of this paper is to trace the development of the QTP scheme in the UK since its inception within the context of evolving notions of 'quality'. The paper begins by discussing notions of quality, distinguishing between quality control and quality assurance, and emphasizing the evolutionary process indicated by the progression from control to assurance. The history of the QTP scheme since its inception is then traced. Finally, the experience of the QTP scheme is reflected upon in the light of the concept of quality within professional education.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart McChlery & Catriona Paisey, 2003. "Quality in professional accounting education provision in the UK - the CIMA experience," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 197-225.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:197-225
    DOI: 10.1080/0963928032000091774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0963928032000091774
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0963928032000091774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaetan Breton, 1999. "Some empirical evidence on the superiority of the problem-based learning (PBL) method," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12.
    2. Ursula Lucas, 2001. "Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: a phenomenographic study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 161-184.
    3. Robert Inglis & Gloria Dall'Alba, 1998. "The re-design of a Management Accounting course based upon principles for improving the quality of teaching and learning," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 193-207.
    4. Markus Milne & Philip McConnell, 2001. "Problem-based learning: a pedagogy for using case material in accounting education," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 61-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:eme:arapps:v:18:y:2010:i:2:p:148-161 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon, 2010. "Teaching with Case Studies: An Empirical Investigation of Accounting Lecturers' Experiences," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 555-567.
    3. Stanley, Trevor & Marsden, Stephen, 2012. "Problem-based learning: Does accounting education need it?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 267-289.
    4. Aldónio Ferreira & Andrijani Santoso, 2008. "Do students’ perceptions matter? A study of the effect of students’ perceptions on academic performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(2), pages 209-231, June.
    5. John Cullen & Sue Richardson & Rona O'Brien, 2004. "Exploring the teaching potential of empirically-based case studies," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 251-266.
    6. Wyness, Lynne & Dalton, Fiona, 2018. "The value of problem-based learning in learning for sustainability: Undergraduate accounting student perspectives," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-19.
    7. Nia Love & Nadine Fry, 2006. "Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 151-166.
    8. Christina Chiang & Paul K. Wells & Peter Fieger & Divesh S. Sharma, 2021. "An investigation into student satisfaction, approaches to learning and the learning context in Auditing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 913-936, March.
    9. Aldys Tan & Bikram Chatterjee & Susan Bolt, 2014. "The Rigour of IFRS Education in the USA: Analysis, Reflection and Innovativeness," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 54-70, February.
    10. Mesa, William B., 2019. "Accounting students’ learning processes in analytics: A sensemaking perspective," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 50-68.
    11. Richard B. Dull & Lydia L. F. Schleifer & Jeffrey J. McMillan, 2015. "Achievement Goal Theory: The Relationship of Accounting Students' Goal Orientations with Self-efficacy, Anxiety, and Achievement," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 152-174, April.
    12. Chiang, Christina & Wells, Paul K. & Xu, Gina, 2021. "How does experiential learning encourage active learning in auditing education?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    13. Wilkin, Carla L., 2014. "Enhancing the AIS curriculum: Integration of a research-led, problem-based learning task," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 185-199.
    14. Palazuelos, Estefanía & San-Martín, Paula & Montoya del Corte, Javier & Fernández-Laviada, Ana, 2018. "Utilidad percibida del Aprendizaje Orientado a Proyectos para la formación de competencias. Aplicación en la asignatura «Auditoría de cuentas»," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 150-161.
    15. Paisey, Catriona & Paisey, Nicholas J., 2010. "Developing skills via work placements in accounting: Student and employer views," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 89-108.
    16. Sugahara, Satoshi & Cilloni, Andrea, 2021. "Mediation effect of students’ perception of accounting on the relationship between game-based learning and learning approaches," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    17. Ballantine, Joan A. & Duff, Angus & McCourt Larres, Patricia, 2008. "Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: A longitudinal study," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 188-201.
    18. Burns, Cathleen S. & Fischer, Mary L. & Latham, Claire Kamm & Matuszewski, Linda J. & Sage, Judith A., 2022. "Leveraging medical education resources to enhance instruction in accounting education," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    19. Lucas, Ursula & Meyer, Jan H.F., 2005. "‘Towards a mapping of the student world’: the identification of variation in students' conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 177-204.
    20. Audrey S. Paterson & William J. Jackson & Andrew P. Grieve, 2012. "The Enhancement of Generic Competencies through the Application of Student Centred Learning: The Students Perspective," Accountancy Discussion Papers 1201, Accountancy Research Group, Heriot Watt University.
    21. Duff, Angus & Mladenovic, Rosina, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of accounting students' approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 321-338.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:197-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.