IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v61y2021i1p913-936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An investigation into student satisfaction, approaches to learning and the learning context in Auditing

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Chiang
  • Paul K. Wells
  • Peter Fieger
  • Divesh S. Sharma

Abstract

Arguably, the audit course is one of the most challenging as it links prior accounting knowledge with new audit knowledge that students are generally not exposed to. A mini‐audit group project was implemented at a New Zealand university, and a learning approach and learning experience survey instrument was administered. Responses from 98 students suggest that they perceived the learning experience positively and were encouraged to adopt a deep approach to learning. The findings have implications for accounting educators in the design and development of learning and assessment strategies in an audit course.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Chiang & Paul K. Wells & Peter Fieger & Divesh S. Sharma, 2021. "An investigation into student satisfaction, approaches to learning and the learning context in Auditing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 913-936, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:61:y:2021:i:1:p:913-936
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12598
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.12598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cohen, Jeffrey & Krishnamoorthy, Ganesh & Wright, Arnie, 2008. "Waste Is Our Business, Inc.: The importance of non-financial information in the audit planning process," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 166-178.
    2. Julie Drake, 2011. "Adding Value to Audit Education through 'Living' Cases," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 203-222.
    3. Peter Booth & Peter Luckett & Rosina Mladenovic, 1999. "The quality of learning in accounting education: the impact of approaches to learning on academic performance," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 277-300.
    4. Josephine Maltby, 2001. "Second thoughts about ' Cases in Auditing '," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 421-428.
    5. Richard Tonge & Caroline Willett, 2012. "An Audit Learning Experience: A Pilot Project Through Cooperation with a Third Sector Organization," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 171-185, May.
    6. Beverley Jackling, 2005. "Perceptions of the learning context and learning approaches: Implications for quality learning outcomes in accounting," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 271-291.
    7. Louis Guttman, 1954. "Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 19(2), pages 149-161, June.
    8. Crawford, Louise & Helliar, Christine & Monk, Elizabeth & Stevenson, Lorna, 2011. "SCAM: Design of a learning and teaching resource," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 61-72.
    9. Martin Turner & Rachel Baskerville, 2013. "The Experience of Deep Learning by Accounting Students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 582-604, December.
    10. Jenna Chaffey & Karen Van Peursem & Mary Low, 2011. "Audit Education for Future Professionals: Perceptions of New Zealand Auditors," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 153-185.
    11. Ian Dennis, 2003. "OK in practice - and theory," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 415-426.
    12. Louise Crawford & Christine Helliar & Elizabeth Monk & Lorna Stevenson, 2011. "SCAM: Design of a learning and teaching resource," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 61-72, March.
    13. Ursula Lucas, 2001. "Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: a phenomenographic study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 161-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kumar Biswas & Sudipta Bose & Millicent Chang & Syed Shams, 2023. "Determinants and consequences of student satisfaction in Australian Universities: Evidence from QILT Surveys," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 1821-1850, June.
    2. Elisabeth Sinnewe & Daifei (Troy) Yao & Laura De Zwaan, 2023. "Developing critical thinking: An examination of contemporary practices in accounting," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 403-425, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiang, Christina & Wells, Paul K. & Xu, Gina, 2021. "How does experiential learning encourage active learning in auditing education?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Duff, Angus & Mladenovic, Rosina, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of accounting students' approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 321-338.
    3. Prerana Agrawal & Jacqueline Birt & Lyndie Bayne & Nikki Schonfeldt, 2022. "The use of case studies in developing students’ understanding of the concept ‘material misstatement’," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1307-1338, April.
    4. Richard B. Dull & Lydia L. F. Schleifer & Jeffrey J. McMillan, 2015. "Achievement Goal Theory: The Relationship of Accounting Students' Goal Orientations with Self-efficacy, Anxiety, and Achievement," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 152-174, April.
    5. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2013. "Accounting education literature review (2010–2012)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 107-161.
    6. Richard Slack & Jan Loughran & Kirsty Abrahams, 2014. "Corporate Associate Partnerships: Practitioners' Involvement in the Delivery of an Auditing Course Based on a Case-Study: A Teaching Resource," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 262-276, June.
    7. Sugahara, Satoshi & Cilloni, Andrea, 2021. "Mediation effect of students’ perception of accounting on the relationship between game-based learning and learning approaches," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    8. Ballantine, Joan A. & Duff, Angus & McCourt Larres, Patricia, 2008. "Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: A longitudinal study," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 188-201.
    9. Aldónio Ferreira & Andrijani Santoso, 2008. "Do students’ perceptions matter? A study of the effect of students’ perceptions on academic performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(2), pages 209-231, June.
    10. Lucas, Ursula & Meyer, Jan H.F., 2005. "‘Towards a mapping of the student world’: the identification of variation in students' conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 177-204.
    11. Belete J. Bobe & Barry J. Cooper, 2020. "Accounting students’ perceptions of effective teaching and approaches to learning: impact on overall student satisfaction," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2099-2143, September.
    12. Kate Wynn-Williams & Nicola Beatson & Cameron Anderson, 2016. "The impact of unstructured case studies on surface learners: a study of second-year accounting students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 272-286, June.
    13. Hall, Matthew & Ramsay, Alan & Raven, John, 2004. "Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first year accounting students," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 2956, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Parunchana Pacharn & Darlene Bay & Sandra Felton, 2012. "Impact of a Flexible Evaluation System on Effort and Timing of Study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 451-470, October.
    15. GUO-FITOUSSI, Liang, 2013. "A Comparison of the Finite Sample Properties of Selection Rules of Factor Numbers in Large Datasets," MPRA Paper 50005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Louis Guttman, 1955. "A generalized simplex for factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 20(3), pages 173-192, September.
    17. Grant L. Harley & R. Stockton Maxwell & Bryan A. Black & Matthew F. Bekker, 2020. "A multi-century, tree-ring-derived perspective of the North Cascades (USA) 2014–2016 snow drought," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 127-143, September.
    18. Andrea Zammitti & Isabella Valbusa & Sara Santilli & Maria Cristina Ginevra & Salvatore Soresi & Laura Nota, 2023. "Development and Validation of the Decent Work for Inclusive and Sustainable Future Construction Scale in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    19. John Cullen & Sue Richardson & Rona O'Brien, 2004. "Exploring the teaching potential of empirically-based case studies," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 251-266.
    20. Margherita Casini & Simone Bastianoni & Francesca Gagliardi & Massimo Gigliotti & Angelo Riccaboni & Gianni Betti, 2019. "Sustainable Development Goals Indicators: A Methodological Proposal for a Multidimensional Fuzzy Index in the Mediterranean Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:61:y:2021:i:1:p:913-936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.