IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v12y2003i2p159-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of the dominant meta programme patterns in accounting undergraduate students and accounting lecturers at a UK business school

Author

Listed:
  • Nigel Brown

Abstract

Meta programmes are a means of describing the behavioural traits that a person exhibits when interacting with other people. An understanding of meta programmes can improve communication between individuals and this may have implications for teaching. The purposes of this study are first to identify the dominant meta programme patterns of first year accounting undergraduates at a UK business school. An earlier pilot study validated use of the Motivation Profile Questionnaire (MPQ) to elicit the dominant meta programmes of accounting lecturers at the same Business School (Brown, 2002). Secondly, the students' meta programmes are compared with those of their accounting teachers to identify whether there are any differences or similarities between the two groups. The matching of the meta programmes of the teachers and students would enhance communication whilst major differences in meta programmes would make communication more difficult. A sample of 62 first year accounting undergraduates and 20 accountancy teachers completed the MPQ. The results indicate that, on average, the accounting students have similar dominant meta programme patterns to their accounting teachers. The implications of the findings for improving communication and therefore teaching are discussed, along with the scope for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Nigel Brown, 2003. "A comparison of the dominant meta programme patterns in accounting undergraduate students and accounting lecturers at a UK business school," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 159-175.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:159-175
    DOI: 10.1080/0963928032000091756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0963928032000091756
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0963928032000091756?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angus Duff, 1999. "Access policy and approaches to learning," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 99-110.
    2. Ursula Lucas, 2001. "Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: a phenomenographic study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 161-184.
    3. Nigel Brown, 2002. "Meta programme patterns in accounting educators at a UK business school," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 79-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nigel Brown, 2006. "The development of a questionnaire assessing metacognitive patterns of students majoring in accounting in higher education," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 301-323.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ballantine, Joan A. & Duff, Angus & McCourt Larres, Patricia, 2008. "Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: A longitudinal study," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 188-201.
    2. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon, 2010. "Teaching with Case Studies: An Empirical Investigation of Accounting Lecturers' Experiences," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 555-567.
    3. Nia Love & Nadine Fry, 2006. "Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 151-166.
    4. Jon Lyons, 2006. "An exploration into factors that impact upon the learning of students from non-traditional backgrounds," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 325-334.
    5. Christina Chiang & Paul K. Wells & Peter Fieger & Divesh S. Sharma, 2021. "An investigation into student satisfaction, approaches to learning and the learning context in Auditing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 913-936, March.
    6. Richard B. Dull & Lydia L. F. Schleifer & Jeffrey J. McMillan, 2015. "Achievement Goal Theory: The Relationship of Accounting Students' Goal Orientations with Self-efficacy, Anxiety, and Achievement," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 152-174, April.
    7. Dong, Nanyan & Bai, Meng & Zhang, He & Zhang, Junrui, 2019. "Approaches to learning IFRS by Chinese accounting students," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Kate Wynn-Williams & Nicola Beatson & Cameron Anderson, 2016. "The impact of unstructured case studies on surface learners: a study of second-year accounting students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 272-286, June.
    9. Fred Pries & Ron Baker, 2010. "A Proposal for Teaching Introductory and Intermediate Accounting in an Environment of International Financial Reporting Standards and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for Private Enterprises," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 15-27, March.
    10. Hall, Matthew & Ramsay, Alan & Raven, John, 2004. "Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first year accounting students," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 2956, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Aldónio Ferreira & Andrijani Santoso, 2008. "Do students’ perceptions matter? A study of the effect of students’ perceptions on academic performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(2), pages 209-231, June.
    12. Angus Duff, 2001. "Psychometric methods in accounting education: a review, some comments and implications for accounting education researchers," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 383-401.
    13. Mesa, William B., 2019. "Accounting students’ learning processes in analytics: A sensemaking perspective," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 50-68.
    14. Chiang, Christina & Wells, Paul K. & Xu, Gina, 2021. "How does experiential learning encourage active learning in auditing education?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    15. Sugahara, Satoshi & Cilloni, Andrea, 2021. "Mediation effect of students’ perception of accounting on the relationship between game-based learning and learning approaches," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    16. Lucas, Ursula & Meyer, Jan H.F., 2005. "‘Towards a mapping of the student world’: the identification of variation in students' conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 177-204.
    17. Stuart McChlery & Catriona Paisey, 2003. "Quality in professional accounting education provision in the UK - the CIMA experience," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 197-225.
    18. Duff, Angus & Mladenovic, Rosina, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of accounting students' approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 321-338.
    19. Nigel Brown, 2006. "The development of a questionnaire assessing metacognitive patterns of students majoring in accounting in higher education," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 301-323.
    20. Sonia Magdziarz & Kim Watty & Kaye Hilliar & Sophia Ji & Melissa Simpson, 2006. "Developing a scholarly approach to the evaluation of assessment practices," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 14(1), pages 24-36, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:159-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.