IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v15y2006i3p325-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exploration into factors that impact upon the learning of students from non-traditional backgrounds

Author

Listed:
  • Jon Lyons

Abstract

UK higher education institutes (HEIs) have widened participation of students from non-traditional backgrounds. These include students who are aged over 21, students in paid employment, and those with non-traditional qualifications, perhaps from other countries or access courses. This has led to a need to explore factors that might impact upon the learning of such students. A greater understanding of such factors might better enable HEIs to provide all students with opportunities to study accounting. The participants in this study are first year students studying accounting at a post-1992 UK university, which has a high proportion of students from non-traditional backgrounds. A series of interviews with such students and the lecturers who teach them explores what engages and what detaches them from learning when studying accounting. The study suggests factors, such as employment and other commitments away from university and the student's relationship with the university, which might impact on how students engage in learning. The Note discusses the findings with reference to Lucas's (2003, A National Teaching Fellowship Project: Introductory accounting: Achieving relevance interest and understanding, available at: http://www.uwe.ac.uk/bbs/research/research/ntfs/Jan03.pdf accessed 21 August 2004) call for research in the area to be more qualitative and Reay et al's. (2001) Sociological Research Online, 5(4), consideration of Bourdieu's concept of institutional habitus and its influence on HEIs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon Lyons, 2006. "An exploration into factors that impact upon the learning of students from non-traditional backgrounds," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 325-334.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:15:y:2006:i:3:p:325-334
    DOI: 10.1080/09639280600850836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09639280600850836
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639280600850836?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angus Duff, 2001. "Psychometric methods in accounting education: a review, some comments and implications for accounting education researchers," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 383-401.
    2. Angus Duff, 1999. "Access policy and approaches to learning," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 99-110.
    3. Richard Wilson, 2002. "Accounting education research: a retrospective over ten years with some pointers to the future," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 295-310.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nick Sciulli & Malcolm Smith & Phil Ross, 2009. "Benchmarking the First Year Accounting Unit: Evidence from Australia," Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, Macrothink Institute, vol. 1(2), pages 115-115, December.
    2. Apostolou, Barbara & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2010. "Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 145-197.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2017. "Analysis of trends in the accounting education literature (1997–2016)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Christopher Humphrey, 2005. "'In the aftermath of crisis: Reflections on the principles, values and significance of academic inquiry in accounting': Introduction," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 341-351.
    3. Zamojcin, Kimberly A. & Bernardi, Richard A., 2013. "Ranking North American accounting scholars publishing accounting education papers: 1966–2011," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 194-212.
    4. Marriott, Neil & Stoner, Greg & Fogarty, Tim & Sangster, Alan, 2014. "Publishing characteristics, geographic dispersion and research traditions of recent international accounting education research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 264-280.
    5. Marann Byrne & Barbara Flood & Pauline Willis, 2002. "The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 27-42.
    6. Ballantine, Joan A. & Duff, Angus & McCourt Larres, Patricia, 2008. "Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: A longitudinal study," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 188-201.
    7. Dong, Nanyan & Bai, Meng & Zhang, He & Zhang, Junrui, 2019. "Approaches to learning IFRS by Chinese accounting students," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Nigel Brown, 2006. "The development of a questionnaire assessing metacognitive patterns of students majoring in accounting in higher education," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 301-323.
    9. Nigel Brown, 2003. "A comparison of the dominant meta programme patterns in accounting undergraduate students and accounting lecturers at a UK business school," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 159-175.
    10. Angus Duff, 2001. "Psychometric methods in accounting education: a review, some comments and implications for accounting education researchers," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 383-401.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:15:y:2006:i:3:p:325-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.