IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v60y2020i3p2099-2143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting students’ perceptions of effective teaching and approaches to learning: impact on overall student satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Belete J. Bobe
  • Barry J. Cooper

Abstract

This study is concerned with the ways to improve the quality of learning experiences of accounting students. Drawing on the effective teaching and student approach to learning literature, we hypothesise that effective teaching and students’ approach to learning (deep versus surface learning) are two important predictors of the quality of the learning experience. The hypotheses were tested using survey data of second‐year undergraduate students enrolled in two core accounting subjects at an Australian university. The data were analysed using the partial least‐squares structural equation modelling approach. The study aims to make a useful contribution to theory and teaching practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Belete J. Bobe & Barry J. Cooper, 2020. "Accounting students’ perceptions of effective teaching and approaches to learning: impact on overall student satisfaction," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2099-2143, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:60:y:2020:i:3:p:2099-2143
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12364
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.12364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marann Byrne & Barbara Flood & Pauline Willis, 2002. "The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 27-42.
    2. Matthew Hall & Alan Ramsay & John Raven, 2004. "Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first-year accounting students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 489-505.
    3. Ursula Lucas, 2001. "Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: a phenomenographic study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 161-184.
    4. Lee D. Parker & James Guthrie, 2010. "Business schools in an age of globalization," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 5-13, January.
    5. Peter Booth & Peter Luckett & Rosina Mladenovic, 1999. "The quality of learning in accounting education: the impact of approaches to learning on academic performance," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 277-300.
    6. Angus Duff, 2004. "Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: the role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 409-430.
    7. Barry Cooper, 2004. "The enigma of the Chinese learner," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 289-310.
    8. Donald E. Wygal & Kim Watty & David E. Stout, 2014. "Drivers of Teaching Effectiveness: Views from Accounting Educator Exemplars in Australia," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 322-342, August.
    9. John Donald & Beverley Jackling, 2007. "Approaches to learning accounting: a cross‐cultural study," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(2), pages 100-121, April.
    10. Lynne Leveson, 2004. "Encouraging better learning through better teaching: a study of approaches to teaching in accounting," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 529-548.
    11. Hall, Matthew & Ramsay, Alan & Raven, John, 2004. "Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first year accounting students," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 2956, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Paul de Lange & Felix Mavondo, 2004. "Gender and motivational differences in approaches to learning by a cohort of open learning students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 431-448.
    13. Parker, Lee, 2011. "University corporatisation: Driving redefinition," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 434-450.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kumar Biswas & Sudipta Bose & Millicent Chang & Syed Shams, 2023. "Determinants and consequences of student satisfaction in Australian Universities: Evidence from QILT Surveys," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 1821-1850, June.
    2. Rui Xue & Adrian Gepp & Terry J. O'Neill & Steven Stern & Bruce J. Vanstone, 2020. "Financial well‐being amongst elderly Australians: the role of consumption patterns and financial literacy," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 4361-4386, December.
    3. Meredith Tharapos & Konrad Peszynski & Kwok Hung Lau & Margaret Heffernan & Gillian Vesty & Aida Ghalebeigi, 2023. "Effective teaching, student engagement and student satisfaction during the Covid‐19 pandemic: Evidence from business students' qualitative survey evaluations," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3173-3192, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duff, Angus & Mladenovic, Rosina, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of accounting students' approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 321-338.
    2. Richard B. Dull & Lydia L. F. Schleifer & Jeffrey J. McMillan, 2015. "Achievement Goal Theory: The Relationship of Accounting Students' Goal Orientations with Self-efficacy, Anxiety, and Achievement," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 152-174, April.
    3. Ballantine, Joan A. & Duff, Angus & McCourt Larres, Patricia, 2008. "Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: A longitudinal study," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 188-201.
    4. Dong, Nanyan & Bai, Meng & Zhang, He & Zhang, Junrui, 2019. "Approaches to learning IFRS by Chinese accounting students," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Yilmaz Guney, 2009. "Exogenous and Endogenous Factors Influencing Students' Performance in Undergraduate Accounting Modules," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 51-73.
    6. Parunchana Pacharn & Darlene Bay & Sandra Felton, 2012. "Impact of a Flexible Evaluation System on Effort and Timing of Study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 451-470, October.
    7. Sugahara, Satoshi & Cilloni, Andrea, 2021. "Mediation effect of students’ perception of accounting on the relationship between game-based learning and learning approaches," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    8. Nicola J. Beatson & David A. G. Berg & Jeffrey K. Smith, 2020. "The influence of self‐efficacy beliefs and prior learning on performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(2), pages 1271-1294, June.
    9. Lucas, Ursula & Meyer, Jan H.F., 2005. "‘Towards a mapping of the student world’: the identification of variation in students' conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 177-204.
    10. Kate Wynn-Williams & Nicola Beatson & Cameron Anderson, 2016. "The impact of unstructured case studies on surface learners: a study of second-year accounting students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 272-286, June.
    11. Bruce Reinig & G. E. Whittenburg & Ira Horowitz, 2009. "Modelling Performance Improvement and Switching Behaviour in Team Learning," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4-5), pages 487-504.
    12. Marann Byrne & Barbara Flood & Pauline Willis, 2004. "Validation of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (assist) using accounting students in the USA and Ireland: a research note," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 449-459.
    13. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon, 2010. "Teaching with Case Studies: An Empirical Investigation of Accounting Lecturers' Experiences," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 555-567.
    14. Christina Chiang & Paul K. Wells & Peter Fieger & Divesh S. Sharma, 2021. "An investigation into student satisfaction, approaches to learning and the learning context in Auditing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 913-936, March.
    15. Mouhcine Tallaki & Enrico Bracci & Monia Castellini, 2015. "Accounting learning preferences: the role of visualisation," Working Papers 2015094, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    16. Rodrigo Macaraig Velasco, 2019. "Factors Associated with Failure in Accounting: A Case Study of the Omani Students," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(6), pages 157-157, December.
    17. Maria Cadiz Dyball & Anna Reid & Philip Ross & Herbert Schoch, 2010. "Compulsory group work – accounting students' conceptions and suggestions," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 92-105, July.
    18. Paul de Lange & Felix Mavondo, 2004. "Gender and motivational differences in approaches to learning by a cohort of open learning students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 431-448.
    19. Sonia Magdziarz & Kim Watty & Kaye Hilliar & Sophia Ji & Melissa Simpson, 2006. "Developing a scholarly approach to the evaluation of assessment practices," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 14(1), pages 24-36, July.
    20. Tucker, Basil P. & Lawson, Raef, 2020. "EMBAs perceived usefulness of academic research for student learning and use in practice," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:60:y:2020:i:3:p:2099-2143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.