IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v33y2003i3p235-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards an understanding of profitability analysis within the residual income valuation framework

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Walker
  • Pengguo Wang

Abstract

This paper argues that there is a mis-match between formal theoretical accounting valuation models, and practical approaches to profitability analysis and valuation. In particular, none of the linear information models published to date exhibit an obvious role for profitability analysis. For example, in the standard Ohlson model, earnings and book value apparently summarise all the value relevant information available from the firm's financial statements and there is no apparent need for any further investigation of the accounting numbers beyond these specific line items. The purpose of this paper is to attempt to investigate potential analytical links between formal valuation models and practical profitability analysis. Specifically, we attempt to show how key features of practical profitability analysis might be incorporated into formal valuation models. In this respect there are two particular aspects of valuation practice to which the formal models published to date have paid no attention. First, in practice we often see explicit reference made to the demand side (sales), and supply side (costs) of the business. Second, we often see attempts to benchmark the financial ratios of one firm against the corresponding ratios of firms in the same industry. The purpose of this paper is to attempt to explain why such practices make sense in the context of an attempt to model the principal determinants of firm value within a residual income valuation framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Walker & Pengguo Wang, 2003. "Towards an understanding of profitability analysis within the residual income valuation framework," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 235-246.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:33:y:2003:i:3:p:235-246
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2003.9729648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2003.9729648
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2003.9729648?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feltham, GA & Ohlson, JA, 1996. "Uncertainty resolution and the theory of depreciation measurement," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 209-234.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pengguo Wang, 2013. "The role of disaggregation of earnings in stock valuation and earnings forecasting," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 530-557, October.
    2. Imtiaz Ahmad & Pascal Alphonse & Michel Levasseur, 2011. "Quel est l'impact de la croissance anormale des résultats sur l'évaluation boursière des entreprises ? Une comparaison internationale," Post-Print hal-00645363, HAL.
    3. Hafiz Imtiaz AHMAD & Pascal ALPHONSE, 2014. "Stock Prices and Implied Abnormal Earnings Growth," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 4(1), pages 196-216.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Siqi & Yin, Chao & Zeng, Yeqin, 2021. "Abnormal investment and firm performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Peter Pope & Pengguo Wang, 2003. "Discussion of Positive (Zero) NPV Projects and the Behavior of Residual Earnings," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1‐2), pages 17-24, January.
    3. Thomas Kaspereit & Kerstin Lopatta, 2013. "The Value Relevance of SAM's Corporate Sustainability Ranking and GRI Sustainability Reporting in the European Stock Markets," ZenTra Working Papers in Transnational Studies 19 / 2013, ZenTra - Center for Transnational Studies, revised Oct 2013.
    4. Kenton K. Yee, 2006. "Earnings Quality and the Equity Risk Premium: A Benchmark Model," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 833-877, September.
    5. Joy Begley & Sandra L. Chamberlain & Yinghua Li, 2006. "Modeling Goodwill for Banks: A Residual Income Approach with Empirical Tests," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 31-68, March.
    6. Imtiaz Ahmad & Pascal Alphonse & Michel Levasseur, 2010. "Les Effets De La Croissance Et De L'Endettement Sur Les Multiples De Capitaux Propres : Representation Theorique Et Comparaison Internationale," Post-Print hal-00481584, HAL.
    7. Hans‐Ulrich Küpper, 2009. "Investment‐Based Cost Accounting as a Fundamental Basis of Decision‐Oriented Management Accounting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(2), pages 249-274, June.
    8. Arturo Leccadito & Stefania Veltri, 2015. "A regime switching Ohlson model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 2015-2035, September.
    9. Dmitry Livdan & Alexander Nezlobin, 2017. "Accounting rules, equity valuation, and growth options," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1122-1155, September.
    10. Benjamin Lynch & Martha O'Hagan‐Luff, 2024. "Relative corporate social performance and cost of equity capital: International evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 2882-2910, July.
    11. Ballas, Apostolos A. & Hevas, Dimosthenis L., 2005. "Differences in the valuation of earnings and book value: Regulation effects or industry effects?," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 363-389.
    12. Vera Palea, 2012. "Are IFRS Value-Relevant for Separate Financial Statements? Evidence from the Italian Stock Market," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201211, University of Turin.
    13. David Ashton & Terry Cooke & Mark Tippett, 2003. "An Aggregation Theorem for the Valuation of Equity Under Linear Information Dynamics," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3‐4), pages 413-440, April.
    14. Juan Manuel Garcia Lara & Araceli Mora, 2004. "Balance sheet versus earnings conservatism in Europe," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 261-292.
    15. Palea Vera, 2013. "Capital Market Effects of the IFRS Adoption for Separate Financial Statements: Evidence from the Italian Stock Market," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201309, University of Turin.
    16. Lucie Courteau & Jennifer L. Kao & Yao Tian, 2013. "Does Accrual Management Impair the Performance of Earnings-Based Valuation Models?," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS12, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    17. Colin Clubb & Martin Walker, 2014. "Payout Policy Relevance and Accounting-based Valuation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 50(4), pages 490-516, December.
    18. Hanlon, Michelle & Myers, James N. & Shevlin, Terry, 2003. "Dividend taxes and firm valuation:: a re-examination," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 119-153, June.
    19. Madhav V. Rajan & Stefan Reichelstein, 2009. "Depreciation Rules and the Relation between Marginal and Historical Cost," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 823-865, June.
    20. Henry L. Friedman & John S. Hughes & Beatrice Michaeli, 2022. "A Rationale for Imperfect Reporting Standards," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2028-2046, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:33:y:2003:i:3:p:235-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.