IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sym/journl/170y2012i1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation and Imitation: Corporate Strategies for Global Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Silvio M. Brondoni

    (Niccolò Cusano University)

Abstract

In open markets where competition is strong, innovation loses its role of 'ideological hierarchy' over imitation; both have the common goal of maximising company profitability, with the constraint of optimising performance results in the very short term. With these objectives and result constraints, the success of research and development activities is measured by the real improvement in the competitive supply potential, expressed by indicators such as time-to-market or patent use rate. The capacity to exploit the competition acquires prime importance, while the capacity to accumulate know-how becomes less important (for example with the traditional indicators of the number of patents per year).

Suggested Citation

  • Silvio M. Brondoni, 2012. "Innovation and Imitation: Corporate Strategies for Global Competition," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, Niccolò Cusano University, issue 1 Innovat, pages 10-24.
  • Handle: RePEc:sym:journl:170:y:2012:i:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://symphonya.unicusano.it/article/view/2012.1.02brondoni
    File Function: First version, 2012
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvio M. Brondoni, 2002. "Global Markets and Market-Space Competition," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, Niccolò Cusano University, issue 1 Market-.
    2. Henry G. Grabowski & John M. Vernon, 1987. "Pioneers, Imitators, and Generics — a Simulation Model of Schumpeterian Competition," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 102(3), pages 491-525.
    3. Mansfield, Edwin & Schwartz, Mark & Wagner, Samuel, 1981. "Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 91(364), pages 907-918, December.
    4. Richard A. D'Aveni & Giovanni Battista Dagnino & Ken G. Smith, 2010. "The age of temporary advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(13), pages 1371-1385, December.
    5. Daniela Salvioni, 2010. "Intangible Assets and Internal Controls in Global Companies," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, Niccolò Cusano University, issue 2 Intangi.
    6. Helpman, Elhanan, 1993. "Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 61(6), pages 1247-1280, November.
    7. Jean-Jacques Lambin & Silvio M. Brondoni, 2001. "Ouverture de 'Market-Driven Management'," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, Niccolò Cusano University, issue 2 Market-.
    8. Sinclair, P J N, 1990. "The Economics of Imitation," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 37(2), pages 113-144, May.
    9. Meyers, Patricia W., 1990. "Non-linear learning in large technological firms: Period four implies chaos," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 97-115, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali, Murad, 2021. "Imitation or innovation: To what extent do exploitative learning and exploratory learning foster imitation strategy and innovation strategy for sustained competitive advantage?✰," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silvio M. Brondoni, 2012. "Ouverture de 'Innovation Management in Global Markets - 1'," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, Niccolò Cusano University, issue 1 Innovat, pages 1-9.
    2. Leonard F.S. Wang & Arijit Mukherjee, 2014. "Patent Protection, Innovation and Technology Licensing," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3-4), pages 245-254, December.
    3. Fosfuri, Andrea, 2000. "Patent protection, imitation and the mode of technology transfer," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 18(7), pages 1129-1149, October.
    4. Azevedo, Mónica L. & Afonso, Óscar & Silva, Sandra T., 2014. "Endogenous growth and intellectual property rights: A north–south modeling proposal," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 112-120.
    5. Borota, Teodora, 2010. "Innovation and Imitation in a Model of North-South TradeRecent evidence on world trade patterns reveals North-South specialization across," Working Paper Series 2010:6, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
    6. Lorenczik, Christian & Newiak, Monique, 2012. "Imitation and innovation driven development under imperfect intellectual property rights," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 1361-1375.
    7. Glass, Amy Jocelyn & Saggi, Kamal, 2002. "Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 387-410, March.
    8. Choi, Jay Pil, 1998. "Patent Litigation as an Information-Transmission Mechanism," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1249-1263, December.
    9. Rajit Biswas, 2015. "Innovation and labour mobility," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 229-246, November.
    10. Lin, Hwan C., 2016. "The switch from patents to state-dependent prizes for technological innovation," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 193-223.
    11. Silvio M. Brondoni, 2003. "Network Culture, Performance & Corporate Responsibility," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, Niccolò Cusano University, issue 1 Corpora.
    12. Yang, Zhenzeng, 2013. "Intellectual Property Rights Protection, Complexity and Multinational Firms," MPRA Paper 46734, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Lin, Hwan C., 2012. "Switching from Patents to an Intertemporal Bounty in a Non-Scale Growth Model: Transitional Dynamics and Welfare Evaluation," MPRA Paper 49782, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 12 Sep 2013.
    14. Stryszowski, P.K., 2006. "Intellectual Property Rights, Globalization and Growth," Other publications TiSEM 32aa98b3-1bd4-43d3-badb-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Hwan C. Lin, 2021. "Vertical innovation, foreign direct investment, and asymmetric imitation: A welfare analysis of intellectual property protection," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 88(2), pages 789-827, October.
    16. Phillip McCalman, 2005. "Who enjoys `TRIPs' abroad? An empirical analysis of intellectual property rights in the Uruguay Round," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 574-603, May.
    17. David J. Teece & Greg Linden, 2017. "Business models, value capture, and the digital enterprise," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Olena Ivus, 2011. "Trade-related intellectual property rights: industry variation and technology diffusion," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 44(1), pages 201-226, February.
    19. Kwan, Yum K. & Lai, Edwin L. -C., 2003. "Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 853-873, March.
    20. Mukoyama, Toshihiko, 2003. "Innovation, imitation, and growth with cumulative technology," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 361-380, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sym:journl:170:y:2012:i:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Silvio M. Brondoni (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.unicusano.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.