IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v4y2017i3p257-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing innovative technologies for retrofitting: Coventry University as a living lab

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullahi Ahmed

    (Coventry University, United Kingdom)

  • Danny McGough

    (Coventry University, United Kingdom)

  • Monica Mateo-Garcia

    (Coventry University, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Retrofitting Solutions and Services for the enhancement of Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings (RESSEEPE) is an EU funded project which aims to bring together design and decision making tools, innovative building fabric manufacturers and a programme to demonstrate the improved building performance achievable through the retrofit of existing buildings at a district level. The RESSEEPE framework is being validated by a strong demonstration programme, envisaging the renovation of 102,000 square metres of public buildings. The core idea of the project is to technologically advance, adapt, demonstrate and assess a number of innovative retrofit technologies implemented on several pilot cases with different climate conditions across Europe (Coventry-UK, Barcelona-Spain and Skellefteå-Sweden) to ensure a high potential replication of the retrofit solutions. The three demonstration sites are involved as the main promoters of a very ambitious district level renovation, demonstrating a systemic approach to technology installation and evaluation, taking into account the benefits of a set of technologies, which properly combined in terms of cost effectiveness and energy performance could achieve reductions around 50% in terms of energy consumption. Coventry University is acting as a Living Lab in order to test some advanced technologies already in the market and others developed specifically within the RESSEEPE project. Those innovative technologies implemented in the pilot case are: Vacuum Insulated Panels, PCM tubes, Ventilated façade with Photovoltaic Panels, Electrochromic windows and Aerogel Mortar. The main feature of this installation is that it acts as a testing bed for where to install different advanced technologies covering specific areas of the building, rather than refurbishing it as a whole. This paper documents the testing of prototype technologies in a pilot case in Coventry University, analysing the process of selection of the different technologies and showing all the challenges faced during installation and coordination of installation activities. The installation process is shown and discussed, highlighting the difficulties, setbacks and challenges faced during the low carbon refurbishment. The key issues are related to technical and health and safety risks. Also, to financial, coordination, planning and legislation barriers etc. It will also show ways forward and solutions adopted. The study also analyses the process of monitoring the energy performance of the spaces retrofitted and the data obtained through the monitoring of the building before and after the installation of the different technologies. The idea behind the Living Lab pilot case is to monitor the performance of those installations in isolation in order to obtain results which allow us to make conclusions about the replicability of the technologies selected in other locations. Ultimately, what is discussed is the overall process followed. This discussion seeks to show the lessons learnt throughout the process and to obtain conclusions from the barriers and engagement issues faced during the installation when retrofitting a public building.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullahi Ahmed & Danny McGough & Monica Mateo-Garcia, 2017. "Testing innovative technologies for retrofitting: Coventry University as a living lab," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(3), pages 257-270, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:4:y:2017:i:3:p:257-270
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2017.4.3S(2)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/15/Ahmed_Testing_innovative_technologies_for_retrofitting_Coventry_University_as_a_living_lab.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.3S(2)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iten, Muriel & Liu, Shuli & Shukla, Ashish, 2016. "A review on the air-PCM-TES application for free cooling and heating in the buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 175-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salvatore Monni & Francesco Palumbo & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2017. "Cluster performance: an attempt to evaluate the Lithuanian case," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(1), pages 43-57, September.
    2. Eugenia Panfiluk & Elżbieta Szymańska, 2017. "The measurement of the innovativeness of health tourism services using an adequacy matrix title of the article," Post-Print hal-01860905, HAL.
    3. Eugenia Panfiluk & Elżbieta Szymańska, 2017. "The measurement of the innovativeness of health tourism services using an adequacy matrix title of the article," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(4), pages 400-420, June.
    4. Natalia Lasarte & Peru Elguezabal & Maialen Sagarna & Iñigo Leon & Juan Pedro Otaduy, 2021. "Challenges for Digitalisation in Building Renovation to Enhance the Efficiency of the Process: A Spanish Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Najiba El Amrani El Idrissi & Ilham Zerrouk & Naoual Zerrari & Salvatore Monni, 2020. "Comparative study between two innovative clusters in Morocco and Italy," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(1), pages 400-417, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rolka, Paulina & Przybylinski, Tomasz & Kwidzinski, Roman & Lackowski, Marcin, 2021. "The heat capacity of low-temperature phase change materials (PCM) applied in thermal energy storage systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 541-550.
    2. Cui, Hongzhi & Tang, Waiching & Qin, Qinghua & Xing, Feng & Liao, Wenyu & Wen, Haibo, 2017. "Development of structural-functional integrated energy storage concrete with innovative macro-encapsulated PCM by hollow steel ball," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 107-118.
    3. Ait Laasri, Imad & Es-sakali, Niima & Charai, Mouatassim & Mghazli, Mohamed Oualid & Outzourhit, Abdelkader, 2024. "Recent progress, limitations, and future directions of macro-encapsulated phase change materials for building applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Lizana, Jesús & Chacartegui, Ricardo & Barrios-Padura, Angela & Ortiz, Carlos, 2018. "Advanced low-carbon energy measures based on thermal energy storage in buildings: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3705-3749.
    5. Vítor Leal & Raul Teixeira, 2020. "PoDIT: Portable Device for Indoor Temperature Stabilization: Concept and Theoretical Performance Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Zeyad Amin Al-Absi & Mohd Hafizal Mohd Isa & Mazran Ismail, 2020. "Phase Change Materials (PCMs) and Their Optimum Position in Building Walls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Ma, Y. & Tao, Y. & Shi, L. & Liu, Q.G. & Wang, Y. & Tu, J.Y., 2021. "Investigations on the thermal performance of a novel thermal energy storage unit for poor solar conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 166-177.
    8. Mehdaoui, Farah & Hazami, Majdi & Messaouda, Anis & Taghouti, Hichem & Guizani, AmenAllah, 2019. "Thermal testing and numerical simulation of PCM wall integrated inside a test cell on a small scale and subjected to the thermal stresses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 597-607.
    9. Liu, Yang & Zheng, Ruowei & Li, Ji, 2022. "High latent heat phase change materials (PCMs) with low melting temperature for thermal management and storage of electronic devices and power batteries: Critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Artur Nemś & Antonio M. Puertas, 2020. "Model for the Discharging of a Dual PCM Heat Storage Tank and Its Experimental Validation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Muriel Iten, 2021. "Techno-Economic Assessment of an Air-Multiple PCM Active Storage Unit for Free Cooling Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-10, November.
    12. Saffari, Mohammad & de Gracia, Alvaro & Ushak, Svetlana & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2017. "Passive cooling of buildings with phase change materials using whole-building energy simulation tools: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1239-1255.
    13. Lin Zheng & Wei Zhang & Fei Liang & Shuang Lin & Xiangyu Jin, 2017. "Experimental Studies of Phase Change and Microencapsulated Phase Change Materials in a Cold Storage/Transportation System with Solar Driven Cooling Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, November.
    14. Shen, Yongliang & Liu, Shuli & Mazhar, Abdur Rehman & Han, Xiaojing & Yang, Liu & Yang, Xiu'e, 2021. "A review of solar-driven short-term low temperature heat storage systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Yan, Tian & Sun, Zhongwei & Gao, Jiajia & Xu, Xinhua & Yu, Jinghua & Gang, Wenjie, 2020. "Simulation study of a pipe-encapsulated PCM wall system with self-activated heat removal by nocturnal sky radiation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1451-1464.
    16. Ioan Sarbu & Calin Sebarchievici, 2018. "A Comprehensive Review of Thermal Energy Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-32, January.
    17. Marine Auzeby & Shen Wei & Chris Underwood & Jess Tindall & Chao Chen & Haoshu Ling & Richard Buswell, 2016. "Effectiveness of Using Phase Change Materials on Reducing Summer Overheating Issues in UK Residential Buildings with Identification of Influential Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Veerakumar, C. & Sreekumar, A., 2020. "Thermo-physical investigation and experimental discharge characteristics of lauryl alcohol as a potential phase change material for thermal management in buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 492-503.
    19. Li, Min & Zhou, Dongyi & Jiang, Yaqing, 2021. "Preparation and thermal storage performance of phase change ceramsite sand and thermal storage light-weight concrete," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 143-152.
    20. Barbi, Silvia & Barbieri, Francesco & Marinelli, Simona & Rimini, Bianca & Merchiori, Sebastiano & Larwa, Barbara & Bottarelli, Michele & Montorsi, Monia, 2021. "Phase change material-sand mixtures for distributed latent heat thermal energy storage: Interaction and performance analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1066-1076.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    low-energy retrofit; living lab; public buildings; stakeholder engagement; performance modelling and monitoring;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:4:y:2017:i:3:p:257-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.